scholarly journals Complementary therapies for cancer patients: assessing information use and needs

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Verhoef ◽  
L. Trojan ◽  
G.D. Armitage ◽  
L. Carlson ◽  
R.J. Hilsden

Many cancer patients seek complementary therapies (CTs) for cancer management; however, relatively little is known about patients’ CT information seeking behaviour. Therefore, we assessed: 1) cancer patients’ use of the types and sources of CT information; 2) their information preferences; and 3) their understanding of the phrase “scientific evidence or proof that a therapy works.” We collected data from 404 patients attending the Tom Baker Cancer Centre (TBCC) in Calgary and 303 patients calling the Cancer Information Service (CIS) helpline. In most cases, patients wanted information on the safety of CTs, how CTs work and their potential side effects. Physicians and conventional cancer centres were the most desired sources of CT information, but relatively few patients obtained information via these sources. Although patients were aware of the meaning of scientific evidence, they often used information based on non‑scientific evidence, such as patient testimonials. The creation of a supportive care environment in conventional cancer treatment centres, by providing CT information, may help address cancer patients’ concerns and alleviate some of the stress that may have been caused by the cancer diagnosis.

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 15-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Squiers ◽  
Lila J. Finney Rutten ◽  
Katherine Treiman ◽  
Mary Anne Bright ◽  
Bradford Hesse

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 109-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Muha ◽  
Kristen Slye Smith ◽  
Susan Baum ◽  
James Ter Maat ◽  
Jo Ann Ward

2011 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Truccolo ◽  
Rosaria Bufalino ◽  
Maria Antonietta Annunziata ◽  
Anita Caruso ◽  
Anna Costantini ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-97
Author(s):  
Robin C. Vanderpool ◽  
Grace C. Huang ◽  
Michelle Mollica ◽  
Adrianna I. Gutierrez ◽  
Candace Deaton Maynard

Author(s):  
Rebecca Durnin ◽  
Paul Shepherd ◽  
Terri Gilleece

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the information needs of radiotherapy patients and their families. To explore influential factors regarding information-seeking behaviours. To identify the preferred formats of information and the optimum time for radiotherapy patients to receive information. To assess the implications for clinical practice in satisfying patient information needs. Method: A Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database search of literature was undertaken and publications screened for retrieval with 36 qualifying for inclusion in the evaluation. Results: There was inconclusive evidence exploring the impact that patient age, diagnosis, family background, and educational status had on the information-seeking behaviours and preferences of cancer patients. There is an agreement that there are positive and negative benefits of using different formats of information: verbal, written, virtual, and so on, and ultimately healthcare providers must utilise a combination of information formats to satisfy the information needs and preferences of individual patients. Inconsistent data were found on the optimum time to deliver cancer information to patients and professionals, and therapeutic radiographers should not assume that their information priorities are the same as those of their patients—every patient has unique and individually specific information needs. Conclusion: The information needs of patients and families are dependent on individual circumstances, and priorities have a tendency to change during the cancer management journey, presenting huge challenges for therapeutic radiographers who are required to regularly reassess and satisfy the varying needs and preferences. More research is needed within the area of information needs and preferences for cancer patients receiving radiotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document