scholarly journals Child Sexual Abuse and the Law in India

Author(s):  
Prof. Prabir Kumar Pattnaik et al., Prof. Prabir Kumar Pattnaik et al., ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliette D. G. Goldman ◽  
Usha K. Padayachi

All school counsellors employed by the State Department of Education in Queensland, Australia, were sent a questionnaire asking about their understanding of child sexual abuse, and their familiarity with procedures and current laws. Results from the 122 respondents (52 males and 70 females), show that they have diverse knowledge of child sexual abuse. There was uncertainty among them as to whether their school had a formal procedure for reporting cases. Most school counsellors have a general knowledge of the laws in Queensland on reporting suspected cases of abuse, but only a minority of them know what the laws require them to do. When asked to describe the laws in Queensland, counsellors who indicated they knew about the law, then described four differing laws. In terms of knowledge of child sexual abuse, females made more accurate statements about sexual abuse than males. Training does contribute to improving counsellors' knowledge of child sexual abuse.


1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Woodcraft

1988 ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Woodcraft

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Campbell

Relationship evidence or evidence that reveals an individual’s propensity to engage in certain offences has been the subject of much discussion in the context of domestic violence. Our understanding and awareness of domestic violence has developed immensely over the past decade and we now understand that domestic violence encapsulates much more than just physical violence against women. We now acknowledge it extends to sexual assault and child sexual abuse. This article examines the current protections provided by the law to restrict the admission of relationship or context evidence in order to ensure an accused person receives a fair trial. It does so by considering the development of the law surrounding relationship evidence, particularly the introduction of s 132 of the Queensland Evidence Act 1977 in 1998. This article explores the application of s 132B and questions whether its aim to simplify the process for admitting relationship evidence has actually been realised.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document