scholarly journals Quality of life patients treated with rituximab intravenous versus subcutaneous in B-cell lymphomas: results from outpatient Hematooncology Clinic in Lodz

Oncoreview ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Witkowska ◽  
Sonia Witkowska ◽  
Marika Klimczak ◽  
Anna Frydecka ◽  
Michał Witkowski ◽  
...  

Introduction: Nowadays, rituximab is available both as intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) formulations. The aim of this study is to compare quality of life (QOL) of patients treated in Hematooncology Clinic in Lodz with B-cell nonHodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) treated with rituximab IV and SC.   Material and Methods: In 50 adult patients with B-NHL diagnosis we assessed QOL by three different questionnaries (EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT/ GOG-NTx and EQ-5D). We compared it between patients treated with rituximab IV and SC.   Results: In comparison of general condition in EQ-5D-3L and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire patients treated with rituximab SC felt statistically better than with IV administration (p<0.01). In SC group general health was evaluated for 72 while in IV for only 58,1. According to FACT/GOG-NTx questionnaire SC group had significantly better physical well-being. In SC group we observed statistically more complete responses (CR) 21 (88%) versus 17 (65%) in IV group. Moreover, trend was observed in emotional well-being in favor of SC treatment.   Discussion: In our study we observed for the first time in the literature statistical difference in frequency of vomiting, nausea, and lack of appetite mentioned from our patients in questionnarie. It is very important that this findings were not published in any other study comparing SC and IV route od administration. Also looking at economic side of SC administration, this type of dosing. As a result it should be preferred form for B-cell lymphoma patients.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
GanBin Li ◽  
Tao Yu ◽  
Hao-Yu Zhang ◽  
Zhen-Jun Wang ◽  
Guang-Hui Wei ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Emergence surgery (ES) and self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are traditional approaches for complete obstructing left-sided colon cancer. A strategy of “stents-chemotherapy-surgery” was applied in our center recently. Studies assessing the anal function and quality of life of patients with complete obstructing left-sided colon cancer are still lacking.Methods: Patients with complete obstructing left-sided colon cancer were included, and three treatment strategies were used, including ES, SEMS, and SEMS followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with complete obstructing left-sided colon cancer. The Wexner, Vaizey, and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores were used to assess anal function and the EORTC QLQ C30 score was used to assess quality of life. Logistic regression analysis was used to detect risk factors affecting short-term anal function of patients.RESULTS: The Wexner scores were similar among the groups during the follow-up period. The Vaizey (H=18.415, P=0.001) and LARS scores (H=3.660, P=0.04) both revealed that anal function among patients receiving SEMS and NACwas significantly better than patients who underwent ES at the 1-month post-operative follow-up evaluation; no significant difference existed at the 6- and 12-month follow-up evaluations. The EORTC QLQ C30 score revealed that social function of patients receiving SEMS and NAC was also significantly better than patients undergoing ES (H=7.035, P=0.03). Logistic regression analysis suggested that a one-stage stoma in an emergent setting is an independent risk factor for short-term reduction of anal function among patients with complete obstructing left-sided colon cancer (OR=5.238, 95% CI: 1.569~17.484, P=0.007).Conclusion: Compared to ES, SEMS might be able to improve the quality of life and short-term anal function in patients with complete obstructing left-sided colon cancer.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4703-4703
Author(s):  
Jyotsna Mehta ◽  
Florence Joulain ◽  
Peter C Trask ◽  
Bonnie Teschendorf

Abstract Abstract 4703 Aims: Patients with NHL present with a classic array of symptoms reflecting the origin of the cancer itself. Symptoms include painless swelling of lymph nodes, increased sensitivity to alcohol, weight loss which can be substantial, persistent fever, soaking night sweats, itchy skin, coughing, difficulty breathing, chest or upper back pain and persistent weakness and tiredness. The severity of symptoms alters the patient's perception of quality of life, their capacity to perform usual activities, and results in seeking medical attention. Due to profound symptoms, it is critical to use excellent measurement tools to record change and demonstrate clinical benefit in trials. The objective of the study was to describe and assess the PRO instruments used in lymphoma, summarize PROs used in ongoing clinical trials, identify gaps in existing PRO measures and evaluate the potential for labeling when using these measures for patient self-report in advanced NHL, particularly as it relates to selecting and implementing PROs. Methods: An in depth literature review was conducted. Elsevier and Medline databases were consulted using Embase platform. Studies were included if they were: published from 01/01–12/11, in English, and included terms related to lymphoma disease and PROs. A thorough review of abstracts was performed. Studies where PRO instruments were used and/or psychometric validation was performed were included. References for selected articles were used to identify other relevant sources. Clinical trials.gov was also used to search for lymphoma trials from 2001–2011. Results: Of 1278 hits, 17 articles met the search criteria. 7 PRO instruments were reported or used in NHL: 2 lymphoma specific questionnaires FACT-Lym (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma module), FACT FLymSI-18 (FACT-Lymphoma Symptom Index), 5 cancer-specific instruments (EORTC-QLQ-C30, FACT-G, CARES (Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System), CARES-SF, QOL-CS (Quality of Life-Cancer Survivors), IOC (Impact Of Cancer scale). The 2 most widely used PROs were FACT-Lym and the EORTC QLQ C30. PRO instruments have been included in ongoing phase 2 and 3 clinical trials (Table 1) as secondary endpoints, including 2 in Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 4 in Follicular lymphoma (FL), and 1 each in indolent NHL or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). EORTC QLQ C30 was the most common instrument followed by FACT-Lym. No specific labeling claims were found in labels made to date for NHL related compounds to FDA or EMA. Conclusions: While there are some lymphoma specific measures, most ongoing trials are using only cancer specific instruments such as EORTC QLQ C30. Several instruments contain only general cancer related symptoms, but not NHL specific symptoms. To more completely understand the burden of disease and treatment effects with NHL through the eyes of patients, evaluation of existing instruments as well as potential instrument development/modification may be warranted. NHL symptom-specific measures could demonstrate therapeutic effectiveness, enhance our understanding of the impact of NHL and provide more evidence of clinical benefit for developing treatments. Disclosures: Mehta: Sanofi: Employment. Joulain:Sanofi: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trask:Sanofi: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5584-5584
Author(s):  
Debora Capelli ◽  
Liviana Giostra ◽  
Denise Maravalle ◽  
Pietro Leoni ◽  
Attilio Olivieri

Abstract Late effects and quality of life (QoL) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) long term adult survivors represent an unexplored field of interest. We prospectively evaluated late effects and dynamic QoL in 44 and 29 cured AML patients (17 <60 years, and 12 >60 years), treated at our department between 1997 and 2010 (7 Allogeneic, 16 Autologous Transplant, 21 chemotherapy alone). We administered EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-AN questionnaires at two different time points with a median interval of 29 months (range: 12-34 months). We stratifyed QoL scores by age at diagnosis, performance status (PS), Sorror Index, kind of leukemia treatment, comorbidity at diagnosis. We observed a worsening of emotional (-9.03; p= 0.04) and cognitive (-6.94; p= 0.05) EORTC scale scores, while FACTG (+2.9; p=0.03), emotional (+1.1; p= 0.04) and Functional (+2.25; p=0.001) well being FACT scores increased. Multivariate analysis showed that older patients had worse EORTC QLQ-C30 physical and emotional scale scores and higher values of pain symptoms in comparison to younger counterpart, with RR of 20.1 (p = 0.001), 22.7 ( p <0.04) and 18.4 (p=0.03) respectively. Elderly patients also had lower Total Outcome Index and FACT-An subscale scores (RR: 11.9, p= 0.02; and 8.77, p= 0.04 respectively). Sorror index > 2 was related to lower EORTC QLQ-C30 social scale and dyspnea scores (RR: 32.5; p=0.001 and 21.7; p=0.001 respectively) and FACT-An functional well being values (RR=3.9; p=0.001). We evaluated late effects occurring in 44 patients, since the third month after the end of treatment, with a median follow-up of 70 months (range: 12-166 months). The most frequent grade II-IV late toxicity was cardiac (3 arythmia, 9 cardiomyopathy) with 89% incidence in patients with Sorror HCT-CI score>2 at diagnosis vs 8.8% in the remaining patients and 0%, 20% and 55.5% in patients receiving respectively Daunorubicin, Idarubicin and at least two different anthracyclines. Sorror Index>2 was the only factor significantly predicting cardiotoxicity at the multivariate analysis with a RR of 82.7 (p=0.001). Twelve patients developped a transient hemochromatosis secondary to transfusions, treated with phlebotomy in 3 cases. Three patients (2 males and 1 female) had been fertile; all female patients developped menopause after Transplant. Four patients had secondary neoplasia consisting of Multiple Myeloma, breast cancer, myelodisplasia and axillary sarcoma. Our study underlines the role of Sorror Index at diagnosis in defining patients eligibility to cardio-prophylactic therapy. The analysis of larger series of cured AML patients are strongly needed in order to define guidelines for reducing long term treatment AML toxicity. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Kyranou ◽  
Marianna Nicolaou

Abstract Background: Spiritual well-being is increasingly investigated in relation to patients’ perceived quality of life and is generally thought as having the potential to support patients with cancer who receive palliative care. Until recently, questionnaires used to assess spiritual well-being were developed mainly in the US. The purpose of this study was to translate and use the EORTC- SWB32, a newly developed tool, validated recently in 4 continents, 14 countries, and in 10 languages, to explore relationships of spiritual well-being with quality of life in patients with cancer.Methods: One hundred four patients participated in this study with an average age of 59 years. Of those, 79% were dealing with metastatic cancer. Data collection took place in three oncology centers from two large cities in Cyprus. The acceptability of the translated items was tested. Two questionnaires were employed for the assessment of quality of life and spiritual well-being, developed by the same organization: the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-SWB32. The scores for each tool were analyzed separately and correlations between the two measures were explored. Results: Patients found the items of the SWB32 tool easy to understand and answer. They attested that filling the questionnaire prompted thoughts about their own spirituality. The mean score for Global Spiritual Well-Being was 60.4 (SD=23.7) and it was associated with the mean scores in the scales “Emotional functioning” and “Cognitive functioning” of the EORTC-QOL-C30 (0.42 and 0.40 respectively, p<0.01). The mean score for the “Relationship with God” scale (74.9, SD=29.7) reported by the Cypriot patients is high and compatible with the homogenous spiritual orientation of the island’s population.Conclusions: All subscales of the SWB32 tool demonstrated good internal consistency in this study. Significant associations were observed between dimensions of quality of life and spiritual well-being. Additionally, the participants found the items easy to answer consistent with the tool’s suggested clinical utility which lays the ground for the application of targeted interventions to enhance spiritual well-being.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 223-223
Author(s):  
Mok-Chung Jennifer Cheng ◽  
B. Douglas Smith ◽  
Christopher Simon Hourigan ◽  
Ivana Gojo ◽  
Keith William Pratz ◽  
...  

223 Background: To better understand adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) survivorship and health related quality of life, we piloted a survey exploring patient reported outcomes for patients in first complete remission (CR) to determine if patients feel the survey is relevant to their overall well-being. Methods: A cross-sectional survey measuring: quality of life, physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 v 3.0); physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being (Quality of Life-Cancer Survivor (QOL- CS) scale); fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue)); anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)); sociodemographic and 5 open-ended questions. Results: 18 participants completed the survey; mean age was 57.2 years. Nine patients were in CR for <2 years, and 9 were in CR for ≥2 years. Participants scored well on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and reported symptoms ranging from 11% (constipation) to 83% (fatigue). The FACIT-Fatigue (worst 0-best 52) mean score was 28.7 and median score was 33.5 (normal ≥30). On the HADS anxiety scale, 2 participants scored in the abnormal range. One scored in the abnormal range on the depression scale. On the QOL-CS, participants scored above 6 out of 10 in all domains, with exceptions of the psychological subscales of distress and fear (Table 1). Most participants felt the survey was completely or mostly relevant (88.8%) in understanding their quality of life. Most felt the length was optimal (77.8%). Conclusions: Most survivors scored well on quality of life and well-being, but with ongoing fatigue, distress, and fear of future tests and recurrence. Few consistently scored worse on the scales. There may be a population coping less well and it would be informative for survivorship programs to prospectively characterize their medical and psychosocial-spiritual needs. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 2245-2255
Author(s):  
Donald L. Patrick ◽  
Annette Powers ◽  
Monika Parisi Jun ◽  
Yeonhee Kim ◽  
Jacob Garcia ◽  
...  

Abstract CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown efficacy as a third-line or later treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, we evaluated the impact of CAR T-cell treatment with lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptoms in patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL in the ongoing, open-label, nonrandomized TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial. Clinically meaningful improvement was observed in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores for global health status/QoL, based on a minimally important difference of 10 points at 2 to 18 months after liso-cel infusion. There were no clinically meaningful changes in physical functioning and pain, whereas clinically meaningful improvements were observed in fatigue at 2, 12, and 18 months. The proportion of patients with clinically meaningful improvement in global health status/QoL was generally higher for treatment responders than for nonresponders. A trend toward decreased mean EQ-5D-5L index scores was observed at 1 month after liso-cel infusion, followed by subsequent increases through 18 months. Mean EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale scores increased from 2 through 18 months. In summary, patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL treated with liso-cel had early, sustained, and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL and symptoms that correlated with antitumor activity. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02631044.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Kyranou ◽  
Marianna Nicolaou

Abstract Background Spiritual well-being is increasingly investigated in relation to patients’ perceived quality of life and is generally thought as having the potential to support patients with cancer who receive palliative care. Until recently, questionnaires used to assess spiritual well-being were developed mainly in the US. The purpose of this study was to translate and use the EORTC- SWB32, a newly developed tool, validated recently in 4 continents, 14 countries, and in 10 languages, to explore relationships of spiritual well-being with quality of life in patients with cancer. Methods One hundred four patients participated in this study with an average age of 59 years. Of those, 79% were dealing with metastatic cancer. Data collection took place in three oncology centers from two large cities in Cyprus. The acceptability of the translated items was tested. Two questionnaires were employed for the assessment of quality of life and spiritual well-being, developed by the same organization: the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-SWB32. The scores for each tool were analyzed separately and correlations between the two measures were explored. Results Patients found the items of the SWB32 tool easy to understand and answer. They attested that filling the questionnaire prompted thoughts about their own spirituality. The mean score for Global Spiritual Well-Being was 60.4 (SD = 23.7) and it was associated with the mean scores in the scales “Emotional functioning” and “Cognitive functioning” of the EORTC-QOL-C30 (0.42 and 0.40 respectively, p < 0.01). The mean score for the “Relationship with God” scale (74.9, SD = 29.7) reported by the Cypriot patients is high and compatible with the homogenous spiritual orientation of the island’s population. Conclusions All subscales of the SWB32 tool demonstrated good internal consistency in this study. Significant associations were observed between dimensions of quality of life and spiritual well-being. Additionally, the participants found the items easy to answer consistent with the tool’s suggested clinical utility which lays the ground for the application of targeted interventions to enhance spiritual well-being.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20070-e20070
Author(s):  
Vincent Lin ◽  
Bhagyashree Oak ◽  
Julia Snider ◽  
Josh Epstein

e20070 Background: CAR T therapy is being investigated as 2nd line therapy in RR-DLBCL. To evaluate its impact on patients’ HRQOL, it is essential to understand the HRQOL of patients receiving current standard of care (SOC) therapy for DLBCL and NHL patients. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) of studies reporting HRQOL in RR-DLBCL patients was conducted in March 2019 (updated to include RR-NHL in May 2019) using EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane (all from 2007), Northern Light and International Society for Quality of Life Research abstracts (both from 2017). A targeted literature review (TLR) for untreated or 1st line patients was conducted in July 2019 using PubMed. Search terms included diseases, lines of therapy and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Abstracts and publications were screened for eligibility and data were extracted. Results: Of the 977 publications screened for the SLR, 26 met the inclusion criteria. Another 18 studies were included from the TLR. The most commonly used PRO measures were the SF-36 (10 studies), EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-Lym (8 studies each). The EORTC QLQ-C30 showed statistically significant or clinically meaningful changes in a greater number of domains (86%) than the FACT-Lym (75%) and SF-36 (62%). Additional results in table. Conclusions: While research is limited, RR-DLBCL patients receiving current SOC therapy report decreases in HRQOL and health utility. Further research is needed on how existing and future therapies may affect HRQOL among RR-DLBCL patients. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5540-5540
Author(s):  
Francesca Sampogna ◽  
Marina Frontani ◽  
Giannandrea Baliva ◽  
Giuseppe Lombardo ◽  
Cristina Di Pietro D Stat ◽  
...  

Abstract Cutaneous lymphoma is a visible cutaneous malignancy, which especially in the more severe forms may have a profound effect on patients lives. The aim of this study was to evaluate quality of life (QoL), psychological distress, and alexithymia in patients with cutaneous lymphoma referring to a dermatological hospital, and to correlate these results with clinical parameters. QoL was evaluated with the Skindex-29, that measures QoL in skin conditions on three scale (symptoms, emotions, and functioning), and the EORTC QLQ-C30, that assesses the QoL of cancer patients. Presence of minor non-psychotic psychiatric disorders was assessed using the GHQ-12, defining as case patients scoring 4 or more; alexithymia was evaluated using the TAS-20 questionnaire. In our ongoing study, we analysed data from the first 66 patients. Of them, 67% were men, the mean age was 58 years (range: 26–85y), and there were 15 patients (23%) with cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (CTBL), and 51 with T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), 6 of them with Sézary Syndrome. In our population, 31.3% of patients were GHQ-cases, 18.6% had alexithymia, and another 22% possible alexithymia. Dermatology-specific QoL was particularly impaired in the symptoms and the emotions scales. QoL was always significantly more impaired in patients with CTCL than in those with CBCL. Also, the prevalence of GHQ-cases was higher (35% in CTCL vs 13% in CBCL), as well as the prevalence of people with alexithymia (48% vs 20%). Skindex-29 and TAS-20 scores significantly correlated with the T stage of lymphoma (i.e., the higher the stage, the lower the QoL and the higher the prevalence of alexithymia). The evaluation of quality of life and psychological problems in patients with cutaneous lymphomas may help clinicians to better manage the disease and its burden on patients life. Also, the relation between quality of life impairment and clinical variables may give important information on the course of the disease as well as the possible effect of treatment.


1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 2932-2932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Kemmler ◽  
Bernhard Holzner ◽  
Martin Kopp ◽  
Martina Dünser ◽  
Raimund Margreiter ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To compare two quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires for cancer patients, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (Fact-G), on the basis of empirical data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-four patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer or Hodgkin's disease completed both the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the FACT-G (German language version) during the same session. Questionnaire data were analyzed on a subscale basis using correlation analysis, canonical correlation, and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Correlations between corresponding subscales of the FACT-G and the EORTC QLQ-C30 ranged from r = .14 for the social domain (very poor agreement) to r = .66 for the physical domain (good agreement), with r values for the other domains lying between these extremes. Canonical correlation analysis for the two sets of subscales revealed that overall agreement between the two instruments was only moderate (first canonical correlation coefficient r = .85, but overall redundancy less than 40%). Of the five FACT-G subscales, only one, physical well-being, was well represented by the EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales (multiple linear regression, R2 = .67). Only three of eight EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales (physical functioning, global QOL, general symptoms) were represented fairly well by FACT-G subscales (R2 = .43 to .60). The lowest R2 values (< .15; ie, virtually no representation by the other instrument) were found for the FACT-G social well-being and relation with doctors and EORTC QLQ-C30 cognitive functioning subscales. CONCLUSION: For the sample investigated, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the FACT-G were found to measure markedly different aspects of QOL, despite considerable overlap. Replicability provided, this implies that neither of the two QOL instruments can be replaced by the other and that a direct comparison of results obtained with the two instruments is not possible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document