Eye Movements during Embedded Figure Tasks

1969 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 271-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic J. Boersma ◽  
Walter Muir ◽  
Keri Wilton ◽  
Richard Barham

Corneally reflected EMs of 16 field-independent and 16 field-dependent Ss were examined concomitantly with individually administered hidden figure items. The data suggested that field-independent Ss make more shifts between target and alternatives than do field-dependent Ss and that males are more deliberate in their visual search than females. The results were discussed in terms of two factors reflecting analytical perception, number of shifts, and mean length of time on target.

1969 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic J. Boersma ◽  
Walter Muir ◽  
Keri Wilton ◽  
Richard Barham

5-letter anagram problems were presented to field-independent and field-dependent Ss and their corneally reflected EMs were examined concomitantly. The data suggest that field-independent Ss are apt to spend less initial time examining specific letters than field-dependent Ss and that males are more deliberate in their visual search than females. The results are discussed in terms of two factors reflecting analytical perception, number of shifts between letters and mean latency to first 5 looks.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray Griffin ◽  
Godfrey Franklin

One hundred and forty-three subjects were identified as Field Independent or Field Dependent based on their performance on the Group Embedded Figures Test, a measure of cognitive style. Results indicated that Field Independent students performed significantly better on course tests and had higher academic potential as measured by the ACT, than Field Dependent students. A regression analysis was conducted to determine which measures would contribute variance to a course test (number correct) criterion. Although both the GEFT and the ACT were significantly related to course test performance, only the ACT contributed significant variance to the regression, F(1,141) = 12.99, r=.29, p <.01. A Principal Components Factor Analysis applied to the GEFT, ACT, and course test data identified two factors. The course tests were associated with factor 1 while the GEFT and ACT were more closely associated with factor 2. The regression and factor analysis results suggest that the ACT and GEFT tests are measuring similar or related constructs for this sample of subjects.


1973 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 956-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Haley

Corneally-reflected horizontal eye movements of 8 field-dependent and 8 field-independent Ss were examined during 6 trials on the rod-and-frame task, each trial being divided into viewing and decision (rod adjustment) periods. Neither average point of looking nor variability of looking (as a measure of perceptual scanning) was related to task error. The results were seen as supporting a distinction between field articulation and perceptual scanning as discrete attention styles.


EDUPEDIA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Sayyidah Umma Rahmawati ◽  
Senja Putri Merona

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan berpikir reflektif siswa ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field independent dan field dependent. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Adapun istrumen yang digunakan adalah Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT), tes soal berpikir reflektif dan wawancara. Sedangkan analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis data Miles dan Huberman yang tediri dari reduksi data, penyajian data dan kesimpulan atau verifikasi.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pada indikator berpikir reflektif reacting terdapat kesamaan berpikir reflektif antara siswa field independent dan field dependent. Pada indikator berpikir reflektif comparing terdapat perbedaan dalam hal menghubungkan pengetahuan yang diberikan dengan pengetahuan yang dimiliki. Pada indikator berpikir reflektif contemplating terdapat perbedaan pada kemampuan mendeteksi kesalahan. Temuan lain dalam penelitian ini adalah bahwa siswa field independent menjelaskan jawabannya dengan detail dan rinci, cenderung menggunakan cara menghafal dan memiliki kepercayaan diri yang tinggi. Sedangkan siswa field dependent menjelaskan jawabannya secara umum, memiliki analisis yang baik dan menyukai cara yang telah ditetapkan


1981 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine R. Parkes

SummaryThe extent to which anxiety, irritability and depression were differentiated as separate entities associated with characteristic patterns of somatic and cognitive symptoms by field dependent (FD) and field independent (Fl) normal female subjects was studied with the Hidden Figures Test and Unpleasant Emotions Questionnaire. In the Fl group the correlations between the three emotions were low and non-significant, reflecting a clear-cut differentiation in symptom configuration, as shown by psychiatrists. In the FD group the inter-correlations were significant and positive, corresponding to relatively poor symptom differentiation, comparable to that of a psychiatric patient group. This suggests that the cognitive style variable of field dependence may underly differences in symptom differentiation associated with psychiatrist/patient differences and, more generally, with social class and sex differences.


1973 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin F. Sousa-Poza ◽  
Robert Rohrberg ◽  
Ernest Shulman

Some characteristics of the social behavior of field-dependents as well as their superior recognition of ambiguous social stimuli led to the hypothesis that they would show greater self-disclosure than field-independents. This hypothesis was tested by administering the 60-item Jourard Self-disclosure Questionnaire (JSDQ) to 13 field-dependent and 13 field-independent Ss. In terms of total self-disclosure scores, field-dependents showed significantly (.025) higher levels than field-independents. Results are discussed in light of personality theories which emphasize the role of self-conceptual transactions in the development of the self.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document