Responses by Graduates to Memory of Their Internship in Clinical Psychology

1977 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 863-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna L. Stout ◽  
George R. Holmes ◽  
William Rothstein

This study is a two-part investigation of clinical psychology internship training at the William S. Hall Psychiatric Institute. The first part surveyed 25 intern graduates to identify the relationship between experiences as an intern and current professional activities. Results are related to findings from other research in training clinical psychologists. The second part pertains to suggestions of intern graduates for specific additions and revisions of internship training at the Institute.

2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 914-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra R. Stader ◽  
Derosset Myers ◽  
Angela Q. Forand ◽  
Linda Frey ◽  
George F. McNulty ◽  
...  

This study extends three earlier investigations involving participants who completed their predoctoral clinical psychology internship at the William S. Hall Psychiatric Institute. Intern graduates ( N = 37) evaluated how effectively their internship training prepared them for seven aspects of their current work as practicing psychologists. Participants also rated the relevancy of 24 different internship training experiences to their current work and how much these experiences contributed to their development as clinical psychologists. The present study, in conjunction with the three previous studies, covers most of the 40-year period since the inception of the internship program. Analysis of the current data indicates the internship has improved over time and was deemed an exceptional training experience by its graduates. Findings may be of particular interest to internship directors and faculty interested in improving their training program and those who plan to conduct a self-study to maintain their accreditation for clinical psychology internship.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Tackett ◽  
Josh Miller

As psychological research comes under increasing fire for the crisis of replicability, attention has turned to methods and practices that facilitate (or hinder) a more replicable and veridical body of empirical evidence. These trends have focused on “open science” initiatives, including an emphasis on replication, transparency, and data sharing. Despite this broader movement in psychology, clinical psychologists and psychiatrists have been largely absent from the broader conversation on documenting the extent of existing problems as well as generating solutions to problematic methods and practices in our area (Tackett et al., 2017). The goal of the current special section was to bring together psychopathology researchers to explore these and related areas as they pertain to the types of research conducted in clinical psychology and allied disciplines.


2021 ◽  
pp. 103985622199264
Author(s):  
Henry Jackson ◽  
Caroline Hunt ◽  
Carol Hulbert

Objective: Clinical psychologists are practitioners with expertise in mental health, who apply advanced psychological theory and knowledge to their practice in order to assess and treat complex psychological disorders. Given their robust specialised mental health training, clinical psychology is an integral component of the Australian mental health workforce, but is under-utilised. Recent reviews have identified significant problems with Australia’s mental health system, including unequal access to clinical psychology services and fragmentation of service delivery, including convoluted pathways to care. Conclusions: Clinical psychology is well placed to contribute meaningfully to public mental health services (PMHS). We describe what clinical psychologists currently contribute to team-based care in PMHS, how we could further contribute and the barriers to making more extensive contributions. We identify significant historical and organisational factors that have limited the contribution made by clinical psychologists and provide suggestions for cultural change to PMHS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document