Structure of the Group Environment Scale in a Seminar-Format Educational Setting

1986 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 831-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald M. Meredith ◽  
Earl D. Schmitz
Keyword(s):  
Educational Setting ◽  
Environment Scale ◽  
Group Environment ◽  
Three Components

The Group Environment Scale was administered to 584 students in 63 seminar-format groups. Factoring gave three components and partially supported Moos' hypothesis concerning the structure of the instrument.

Campus Social Climate Correlates of Environmental Type Dimensions

NASPA Journal ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W. Salter ◽  
Reynol Junco ◽  
Summer D. Irvin
Keyword(s):  
Work Environment ◽  
Personal Growth ◽  
Type Theory ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Environment Scale ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Group Environment ◽  
System Maintenance ◽  
Environment Type

To address the ability of the Salter Environment Type Assessment (SETA) to measure different kinds of campus environments, data from three studies of the SETA with the Work Environment Scale, Group Environment Scale, and University Residence Environment Scale were reexamined (n = 534). Relationship dimension scales were very consistent with extraversion and feeling from environmental type theory. System maintenance and systems change scales were associated with judging and perception on the SETA, respectively. Results from the SETA and personal growth dimension scales were mixed. Based on this analysis, the SETA may serve as a general purpose environmental assessment for use with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.

Intervention Group Environment Scale

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Wilson ◽  
Nathan D. Hansen ◽  
Nalini Tarakeshwar ◽  
Sharon Neufeld ◽  
Arlene Kochman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intervention Group ◽  
Environment Scale ◽  
Group Environment

Attributes of Group Atmosphere as Predictors of Students' Satisfaction in Seminar-Format Classes

1987 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald M. Meredith
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Leader Support ◽  
Environment Scale ◽  
Group Environment ◽  
Students Satisfaction

Moos' Group Environment Scale was administered to 450 college students in 63 seminar-format classes. The Leader Support and Cohesion scales were salient predictors of several end-of-semester ratings of effect of the program.

Dimensions of the group environment scale

1986 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn S. Hartsough ◽  
John M. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Environment Scale ◽  
Group Environment

Coach-athlete Interactions and Team Climate

1982 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Craig Fisher ◽  
Victor H. Mancini ◽  
Ronald L. Hirsch ◽  
Thomas J. Proulx ◽  
Ellen J. Staurowsky
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Behavioral Analysis ◽  
Team Climate ◽  
Interaction Patterns ◽  
Environment Scale ◽  
Group Environment ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Basketball Teams

Coaches and athletes from high school basketball teams (N = 50) served as subjects for three research investigations dealing with the relationship between coach-athlete interaction patterns and team climates, and coach-athlete perceptions of team climates. Basketball practices were videotaped and the interaction patterns were coded by Cheffers' Adaptation of Flanders' Interaction Analysis System (CAFIAS). Team climates were assessed by the Group Environment Scale (GES), an inventory designed to characterize and assess the psychosocial qualities of diverse environments. The quantity, quality, and sequence of coach-athlete interactions revealed a clear demarcation between satisfied and less satisfied team climates. Coaches perceived their team climates as more ideal and less in need of change than did athletes. Coach-athlete behavioral analysis and various aspects of teams' psychosocial environments pointed to the directions where changes might be implemented.

The Jovian ring

1984 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 203-209
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Burns
Keyword(s):  
Equatorial Plane ◽  
Charged Particles ◽  
Dynamical Evolution ◽  
Main Band ◽  
Small Grains ◽  
Three Components

ABSTRACTLying in Jupiter's equatorial plane is a diaphanous ring having little substructure within its three components (main band, faint disk, and halo). Micron-sized grains account for much of the visible ring, but particles of centimeter sizes and larger must also be present to absorb charged particles. Since dynamical evolution times and survival life times are quite short (≲102-3yr) for small grains, the Jovian ring is being continually replenished; probably most of the visible ring is generated by micrometeoroids colliding into unseen parent bodies that reside in the main band.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document