Effectiveness of Problem-Solving Groups: Process and Outcome Criteria

1994 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 1139-1153 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Wanous ◽  
Arnon E. Reichers ◽  
Christine Cooper ◽  
Raghunandan Rao

Multiple measures of both group process and effectiveness of outcome were gathered from 100 problem-solving groups of 526 people. Generally low correlations among the measures of effectiveness of process and those of outcome effectiveness indicate that effectiveness is multidimensional as previously suggested. The relationships between measures of process and effectiveness of outcome supported previous models suggesting general linkages between these two sets of measures. The particular pattern of relationships between process and outcome measures found here was understandable, given the context in which these data were gathered. Thus, the use of multiple measures of both process and effectiveness of outcome in research on small groups is recommended.

1973 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 623-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Jay Gross ◽  
Andrew I. Schwebel

A major issue in evaluating innovative teaching methods has been the selection of outcome criteria. With a goal of developing students' process skills, the authors taught a clinical psychology course to undergraduates. To evaluate the course's effectiveness, Shostrom's Personal Orientation Inventory was utilized. There were significant changes in students' scores on 6 of the 12 scales. The implication of utilizing outcome measures consonant with the goals of a particular course was examined.


1976 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Ryle ◽  
Susan Lipshitz

SummaryA therapeutic group with eight members was studied, using psychometric tests, improvement ratings based on pre-treatment statements of patients' hopes, and of therapists' aims rated for achievement on the basis of post-treatment interviews, and two forms of repertory grid testing. The In-Group Grid yielded a number of measures relating to outcome and to aspects of the group process. Most patients improved by some criteria, and most measures of improvement intercorrelated positively but not, in most cases, highly. Few clear relations between process and outcome measures were demonstrated.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 843-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arti D. Desai ◽  
Tamara D. Simon ◽  
JoAnna K. Leyenaar ◽  
Maria T. Britto ◽  
Rita Mangione-Smith

1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Li-Ping Tang ◽  
Peggy Smith Tollison ◽  
Harold D. Whiteside

Based on the archival data of a quality circle (QC) program in a three-year period, the differences between active QCs (n = 32) and inactive QCs (n = 12) on QC members' participation and QCs' performance were examined using a discriminant analysis. The results showed that active QCs had lower rate of problem-solving failure, higher attendance rate at QC meetings, and higher net savings of QC projects than inactive QCs. The results were discussed in terms of the problem-solving process of small groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document