The Future of Financial Planning in the Digital Age

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Kitces
2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Shawn Mauldin ◽  
Mark Wilder ◽  
Morris H. Stocks

The AICPA has taken the position that accreditation of CPAs in specific areas of practice is an important aspect of repositioning the CPA profession for the future. The AICPA currently offers two designations exclusively to CPAs, one of which is the Personal Financial Specialist (PFS) designation. However, the issue of accrediting CPAs by granting official AICPA designations is a complex and highly debated issue with opposing sides having compelling arguments supporting their positions. CPAs and other professionals specializing in personal financial planning have opportunities to obtain designations other than the PFS. This paper examines the relative value of these alternative options for financial planners. Specifically, the research was designed to examine the differential effects of alternative financial-planning accreditations on users' perceptions. These perceptions relate to various professional attributes of a financial planner such as their knowledge and expertise, objectivity, and level of trust and ethics possessed. In addition, these perceptions relate to fees charged and the influence that the designation has on the public's choice of a financial planner. Our results indicate that the CPA designation used in conjunction with the PFS designation is generally perceived to signal a higher level of professional attributes than the other designations examined in the study. In addition, a CPA with a PFS designation has a significantly greater influence on the public's choice of a financial planner than do the other designations. These results suggest that important benefits may accrue to CPAs from holding the PFS specialty accreditation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. P579-P579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arielle Burstein ◽  
Olivia DaDalt ◽  
Birgit Kramer ◽  
Lisa D'Ambrosio ◽  
Joseph Coughlin

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 64-65
Author(s):  
Maria Ferguson

The growth of online content has raised questions about how digital reading affects the brain and what kinds of reading instruction students need to be prepared for the future. Some researchers have noted that the need to process large amounts of information may be causing readers’ brains to become more suited to skimming than to deep reading. Maria Ferguson observes that this raises a dilemma for educators who prize the critical thinking and analytical skills that come from deep reading while recognizing that the ability to sift large amounts of material is a valued skill in today’s workplaces.


2014 ◽  
Vol 102 (12) ◽  
pp. 1873-1877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica C. Flack ◽  
Raissa M. D'Souza

2019 ◽  

The future of work is an issue everyone is talking about. However, the changes to work caused by the digital age arrived in the present long ago. In this study, the authors examine the challenges posed by this fact as concretely as possible and classify them in terms of social ethics because the values and convictions that have characterised the German job market for decades are still valid today. Even if jobs have changed, the social and personal significance of work remains the same. We should therefore change our perspective of employment from Work 4.0 to Work 1.0. With contributions by Eva M. Welskop-Deffaa, Emma Sommerfeld, Gisela Schurath, Karl Schiewerling, Eva Rindfleisch, Annette Niederfranke, Justus Lenz, Dagmar König, Martin Kamp, Regina Görner, Nils Goldschmidt, Carlos Frischmuth, Ralf Brauksiepe, Egbert Biermann, Karlies Abmeier und Patricia Ehret.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document