scholarly journals Considerations Regarding Age at Surgery and Fistula Incidence Using One- and Two-stage Closure for Cleft Palate

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 302-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stoicescu Simona ◽  
Enescu Dm
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Fistula Formation ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair

Abstract Introduction: Although cleft lip and palate (CLP) is one of the most common congenital malformations, occurring in 1 in 700 live births, there is still no generally accepted treatment protocol. Numerous surgical techniques have been described for cleft palate repair; these techniques can be divided into one-stage (one operation) cleft palate repair and two-stage cleft palate closure. The aim of this study is to present our cleft palate team experience in using the two-stage cleft palate closure and the clinical outcomes in terms of oronasal fistula rate. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on medical records of 80 patients who underwent palate repair over a five-year period, from 2008 to 2012. All cleft palate patients were incorporated. Information on patient’s gender, cleft type, age at repair, one- or two-stage cleft palate repair were collected and analyzed. Results: Fifty-three (66%) and twenty-seven (34%) patients underwent two-stage and one-stage repair, respectively. According to Veau classification, more than 60% of them were Veau III and IV, associating cleft lip to cleft palate. Fistula occurred in 34% of the two-stage repairs versus 7% of one-stage repairs, with an overall incidence of 24%. Conclusions: Our study has shown that a two-stage cleft palate closure has a higher rate of fistula formation when compared with the one-stage repair. Two-stage repair is the protocol of choice in wide complete cleft lip and palate cases, while one-stage procedure is a good option for cleft palate alone, or some specific cleft lip and palate cases (narrow cleft palate, older age at surgery)

scholarly journals Incidence of Palatal Fistula after One-Stage Palatoplasty and Factors Influencing the Fistula Occurrence

1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurardhilah Vityadewi ◽  
Kristaninta Bangun
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Fistula Formation ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Hypernasal Speech ◽  
Palate Repair

Background: Cleft palate repair may be compromised by a number of complications, most commonly the development of a fistula. Fistulas are related to an increased rate of hypernasal speech, articulation problems, and food or liquid regurgitation from the nose. Fistulas also tend to recur after a secondary repair to address the fistulas. This study reviews the rate of fistula in our craniofacial center after a onestage cleft palate repair; and to determine whether, cleft type, age at repair, type of cleft repair, hemoglobin level presurgery, and patients nutritional state influence the risk of fistula occurence. Patient and Method: A retrospective analysis was performed on medical records of 93 patients who underwent palate repair between January 2012 to October 2013. All consecutive cleft (lip and) palate patients are included. Bivariate analysis was performed to identify the predictors of fistula formation. Result: Ninety-three patients (50 male and 43 female) underwent one-stage palatoplasty. Cleft palate fistulas occured in 19 of 93 patients (20,4%). The age of the patients at the time of repair ranged from 9 to 144 months (mode 18 months). All palate repairs were done in one stage, using either the two flap (N=66), Wardill-Kilner (N=24), Furlow (N=2), and Langenback (N=1) techniques. No significant influence was found related between age at the time of repair (p 0.789), body weight (p 0.725), Hemoglobin value (p 0.295), and type of cleft (p 0.249) to the rate of fistula occurrence. Summary: This study found no association between , body weight, preoperative hemoglobin value, and the type of cleft to the rate of fistula following cleft palate surgery.

Impact of cleft palate repair on speech and development of dentoalveolar deformities

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
Yu.V. Stebeleva ◽  
◽  
Ad.A. Mamedov ◽  
Yu.O. Volkov ◽  
A.B. McLennan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Normal Functioning ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Congenital Cleft ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Late Postoperative Period

Surgical repair of cleft palate is quite difficult because it aims not only to eliminate the anatomical defect of the palate, but also to ensure normal functioning, including speech. Moreover, successful surgery implies no or minimal deformation of the middle face that can be corrected in the late postoperative period. No doubt that primary surgery (both in terms of technique and time) is crucial for further growth and development of the maxilla. However, surgical techniques and the age of primary cleft palate repair vary between different clinics, which makes this literature review highly relevant. Key words: cleft palate repair, cleft palate, congenital cleft lip and palate

scholarly journals Corelation Of Parents’ Profiles Of Children With Late Cleft Repair In Surabaya Cleft Lip And Palate Centre (January 2015 – December 2017)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Laras Puspita Ningrum ◽  
Iswinarno Doso Saputro ◽  
Lobredia Zarasade
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Speech Disorders ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair

Background : Optimal time of  Cleft palate repair is during the 10 to 12  month of age. In this time produce far natural results in terms of speech because it enabled the maturation of scar tissue postoperatively. The soft palate must function properly before the patient starts learning to talk, otherwise speech disorders such as persistent rhinolalia aperta might arise. In pediatric patients, the role of parents is very important on adherence to therapy.Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The first study group was parents of patients who had surgical repair before two years old and the second group was the parents of patients who had repair after two years old. We compared age, monthly income, education level, number of children, and residential distance from Surabaya of the two groups.Results : The data of this study were obtained from the medical records of patients with cleft lip surgery at CLP Center Surabaya in 2015th – 2017th with total of 358 patients, 172 were female and 186 were male. 52 patients with delayed cleft palate surgery. Patients’ parents in both groups were mostly 31-40 years old, were high school graduated, has one child, earned less than 1.5 million rupiah a month, and lived less than 100 kms from Surabaya. From the statistical results, parent’s income has the strongest correlation with the patient’s age in cleft palate surgery (-2.7). A negative coefficient means that the less parent’s income, the more patient likely had delayed cleft palate surgery. While other factors found weak and very weak correlations.Conclusions: The results form patient's parents' interview, concluded that besides economic factors, the lack of information cleft palate treatment is the key factors that contributed to the delay of cleft palate repair. The education level does not affect the delay in cleft palate surgery, because even in high educated parents, sometimes they don’t understand the stages of cleft lip and palate treatment. This study emphasized the necessity to educate about the stages of surgery by primary care physicians, to minimize delays.

Improved Early Cleft Lip and Palate Complications at a Surgery Specialty Center in the Developing World

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 1145-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene Park ◽  
Gaurav Deshpande ◽  
Bjorn Schonmeyr ◽  
Carolina Restrepo ◽  
Alex Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Developing World ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Surgical Mission ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Cleft Lip Repair ◽  
Palate Repair

Objective: To evaluate complication rates following cleft lip and cleft palate repairs during the transition from mission-based care to center-based care in a developing region. Patients and Design: We performed a retrospective review of 3419 patients who underwent cleft lip repair and 1728 patients who underwent cleft palate repair in Guwahati, India between December 2010 and February 2014. Of those who underwent cleft lip repair, 654 were treated during a surgical mission and 2765 were treated at a permanent center. Of those who underwent cleft palate repair, 236 were treated during a surgical mission and 1491 were treated at a permanent center. Setting: Two large surgical missions to Guwahati, India, and the Guwahati Comprehensive Cleft Care Center (GCCCC) in Assam, India. Main Outcome Measure: Overall complication rates following cleft lip and cleft palate repair. Results: Overall complication rates following cleft lip repair were 13.2% for the first mission, 6.7% for the second mission, and 4.0% at GCCCC. Overall complication rates following cleft palate repair were 28.0% for the first mission, 30.0% for the second mission, and 15.8% at GCCCC. Complication rates following cleft palate repair by the subset of surgeons permanently based at GCCCC (7.2%) were lower than visiting surgeons ( P < .05). Conclusions: Our findings support the notion that transitioning from a mission-based model to a permanent facility-based model of cleft care delivery in the developing world can lead to decreased complication rates.

Association Between Palatal Index and Cleft Palate Repair Outcomes in Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Percy Rossell-Perry ◽  
Evelyn Caceres Nano ◽  
Arquímedes M. Gavino-Gutierrez
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair

Dentoalveolar Arch Dimensions in UCLP Boys After Neonatal Cheiloplasty or After Lip Surgery at the Age of 3 or 6 Months

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1020-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Kotova ◽  
Wanda Urbanova ◽  
Andrej Sukop ◽  
Renata Peterkova ◽  
Miroslav Peterka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Arch Width ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Deciduous Molars ◽  
Plaster Casts

Objective: To compare the influence of 3 different time protocols of cleft lip and palate operations on the growth of the dentoalveolar arch in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Materials and Methods: We evaluated 64 plaster casts of 8-year-old boys with UCLP operated on according to 3 different time protocols: lip repair at the age of 6 months and palate repair at 4 years, lip repair at 3 months and palate repair at 9 months, and neonatal lip repair and palate repair at 9 months. The control group contained 13 plaster casts of 8-year-old boys. The dentoalveolar arch width was measured between deciduous canines and between the second deciduous molars; the length was measured between incisive papilla and the line connecting both tuber maxillae. Results: All measured distances were statistically significantly smaller in boys with UCLP than in the control group. Intercanine width was not statistically significantly different between the patients operated on according to the different time protocols. In comparison to the lip repair at 6 months and palate repair at 4 years, the intermolar width was statistically significantly smaller in the group with neonatal lip repair; the alveolar arch length was statistically significantly shorter in both groups with lip repair performed neonatally or at 3 months. Conclusions: The length of the dentoalveolar arch is shorter after surgical repair of cleft lip neonatally or at the age of 3 months. Cleft palate repair at 9 months can contribute to a reduction in the width of the dentoalveolar arch.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document