Verification of the Calculation Assumptions Applied to Solutions of the Acoustic Measurements Uncertainty

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-202
Author(s):  
Wojciech Batko ◽  
Renata Bal

Abstract The assessment of the uncertainty of measurement results, an essential problem in environmental acoustic investigations, is undertaken in the paper. An attention is drawn to the - usually omitted - problem of the verification of assumptions related to using the classic methods of the confidence intervals estimation, for the controlled measuring quantity. Especially the paper directs attention to the need of the verification of the assumption of the normal distribution of the measuring quantity set, being the base for the existing and binding procedures of the acoustic measurements assessment uncertainty. The essence of the undertaken problem concerns the binding legal and standard acts related to acoustic measurements and recommended in: 'Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement' (GUM) (OIML 1993), developed under the aegis of the International Bureau of Measures (BIPM). The model legitimacy of the hypothesis of the normal distribution of the measuring quantity set in acoustic measurements is discussed and supplemented by testing its likelihood on the environment acoustic results. The Jarque-Bery test based on skewness and flattening (curtosis) distribution measures was used for the analysis of results verifying the assumption. This test allows for the simultaneous analysis of the deviation from the normal distribution caused both by its skewness and flattening. The performed experiments concerned analyses of the distribution of sound levels: LD, LE, LN, LDWN, being the basic noise indicators in assessments of the environment acoustic hazards.

2010 ◽  
Vol 437 ◽  
pp. 217-221
Author(s):  
Jia Chun Lin ◽  
Michael Paul Krystek ◽  
Zhao Yao Shi

According to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), all measurement results must have a stated uncertainty associated to them. But in most cases of roundness measurement either no uncertainty value is given, or the calculation is not based on the model of the respective association criterion for the geometrical feature, because no suitable measurement uncertainty calculation procedure does exist. For the case of roundness measurement in coordinate metrology, this paper will suggest algorithms for the calculation of the measurement uncertainty of the roundness deviation based on the two mainly used association criteria LSC and MZC. The calculation of the sensitivity coefficients for the uncertainty calculation can be done by automatic differentiation, in order to avoid introducing additional errors by the traditional difference quotient approximations. The proposed methods are exact and need as input data only the measured co-ordinates of the data points and their associated uncertainties.


2010 ◽  
Vol 437 ◽  
pp. 212-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Yao Shi ◽  
Jia Chun Lin ◽  
Michael Paul Krystek

The helix is a complex geometrical element. During the process of a dynamical measurement of the helical deviations, many factors, including the machine and the environment, lead to measurement errors. Although ISO as well as national standards stipulate the tolerances and assessment methods for helical deviations, these standards contribute little to the uncertainty calculations concerning such measurements. According to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), all measurement results must have a stated uncertainty associated to them. But in most cases of helical deviation measurements, no uncertainty value is given, simply because no measurement uncertainty calculation procedure exists. For the case of helical deviation measurements on a Computer Numeric Control (CNC) polar coordinate machine, this paper analyses in detail all kinds of factors contributing to the measurement uncertainty, and gives the calculation procedure of the measurement uncertainty of helical deviation. As an example, the calculation of the measurement uncertainty of the helical deviations of a worm is presented.


Metrology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-92
Author(s):  
Simona Salicone ◽  
Harsha Vardhana Jetti

The concept of measurement uncertainty was introduced in the 1990s by the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”, known as GUM. The word uncertainty has a lexical meaning and reflects the lack of exact knowledge or lack of complete knowledge about the value of the measurand. Thanks to the suggestions in the GUM and following the mathematical probabilistic approaches therein proposed, an uncertainty value can be found and be associated to the measured value. In the last decades, however, other methods have been proposed in the literature, which try to encompass the definitions of the GUM, thus overcoming its limitations. Some of these methods are based on the possibility theory, such as the one known as the RFV method. The aim of this paper is to briefly recall the RFV method, starting from the very beginning and the initial motivations, and summarize in a unique paper the most relevant obtained results.


2014 ◽  
Vol 613 ◽  
pp. 354-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Dietrich

Calculations of capability and performance indices are based on measurement results. The uncertainty of the measurement process used to generate capability and performance indices must be estimated before the indices can be meaningful. The actual measurement uncertainty needs to be adequately small.To demonstrate the suitability of measurement processes, were in the industrial production process based on the MSA version 4 (AIAG Measurement System Analysis [) is used.Another procedure is based on the ISO 98-3 ISO; Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) [. But this is not practical in production. Therefore, the ISO 22514-7 [ was published. This document is in the FDIS (Final Draft ISO) status and will be official until mid-2012 as an ISO Standard. The VDA 5; Measurement Process Capability [ is also based on this new standard


Author(s):  
Célia Venchiarutti ◽  
Rožle Jakopič ◽  
Carmel Hennessy ◽  
Kalman Toth

AbstractThis paper presents the preparation, characterisation and validation of two quality control (QC) samples for the measurement of plutonium and uranium contents by isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS). These two QC samples were then used at the JRC-Geel G.2′s laboratory to monitor the performance of IDMS measurement results in line with the ISO 17025 and ISO 17034. The QC samples were prepared from two certified reference materials, namely the NBL-126 (Pu) and CRM 116-A (U). The values for the 235U and 239Pu amount contents of the QC samples were assigned based on the gravimetric preparation of the solutions and verified by independent IDMS measurements. Their use as part of a broader in-house spike inter-calibration campaign, notably during participations in proficiency tests, is also highlighted. Finally, using these two IDMS QC samples, a detailed approach to the IDMS uncertainty evaluation, according to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM, 2008) is presented on various examples.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriaan M. H. van der Veen ◽  
Juris Meija ◽  
Antonio Possolo ◽  
David Brynn Hibbert

Abstract Many calculations for science or trade require the evaluation and propagation of measurement uncertainty. Although relative atomic masses (standard atomic weights) of elements in normal terrestrial materials and chemicals are widely used in science, the uncertainties associated with these values are not well understood. In this technical report, guidelines for the use of standard atomic weights are given. This use involves the derivation of a value and a standard uncertainty from a standard atomic weight, which is explained in accordance with the requirements of the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Both the use of standard atomic weights with the law of propagation of uncertainty and the Monte Carlo method are described. Furthermore, methods are provided for calculating uncertainties of relative molecular masses of substances and their mixtures. Methods are also outlined to compute material-specific atomic weights whose associated uncertainty may be smaller than the uncertainty associated with the standard atomic weights.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 1182-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Farrance ◽  
Robert Frenkel ◽  
Tony Badrick

AbstractThe long-anticipated ISO/TS 20914, Medical laboratories – Practical guidance for the estimation of measurement uncertainty, became publicly available in July 2019. This ISO document is intended as a guide for the practical application of estimating uncertainty in measurement (measurement uncertainty) in a medical laboratory. In some respects, the guide does indeed meet many of its stated objectives with numerous very detailed examples. Even though it is claimed that this ISO guide is based on the Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM), JCGM 100:2008, it is with some concern that we believe several important statements and statistical procedures are incorrect, with others potentially misleading. The aim of this report is to highlight the major concerns which we have identified. In particular, we believe the following items require further comment: (1) The use of coefficient of variation and its potential for misuse requires clarification, (2) pooled variance and measurement uncertainty across changes in measuring conditions has been oversimplified and is potentially misleading, (3) uncertainty in the results of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) do not include all known uncertainties, (4) the international normalized ratio (INR) calculation is incorrect, (5) the treatment of bias uncertainty is considered problematic, (6) the rules for evaluating combined uncertainty in functional relationships are incomplete, and (7) specific concerns with some individual statements.


2006 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 541-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Frenkel ◽  
Robert D. Chiroco ◽  
Vladimir Diky ◽  
Qian Dong ◽  
Kenneth N. Marsh ◽  
...  

ThermoML is an Extensible Markup Language (XML)-based new IUPAC standard for storage and exchange of experimental, predicted, and critically evaluated thermophysical and thermochemical property data. The basic principles, scope, and description of all structural elements of ThermoML are discussed. ThermoML covers essentially all thermodynamic and transport property data (more than 120 properties) for pure compounds, multicomponent mixtures, and chemical reactions (including change-of-state and equilibrium reactions). Representations of all quantities related to the expression of uncertainty in ThermoML conform to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). The ThermoMLEquation schema for representation of fitted equations with ThermoML is also described and provided as supporting information together with specific formulations for several equations commonly used in the representation of thermodynamic and thermophysical properties. The role of ThermoML in global data communication processes is discussed. The text of a variety of data files (use cases) illustrating the ThermoML format for pure compounds, mixtures, and chemical reactions, as well as the complete ThermoML schema text, are provided as supporting information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document