scholarly journals Performances of Diagnostic Methods in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50
Author(s):  
Elena-Roxana Săraru ◽  
Răzvan Peagu ◽  
Ana-Maria Călin-Necula ◽  
Alexandru Moldoveanu ◽  
Carmen Fierbinţeanu-Braticevici

AbstractGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common chronic gastrointestinal ailments worldwide, with a high prevalence and extremely costly diagnostic and therapeutic management. A hygienic-dietary regimen, accompanied by weight loss, are important factors for improving the symptoms of reflux disease. Various ways of correct diagnosis and for therapeutic management have been attempted over the years, of which themost widely used diagnostic method is empirical therapy with proton pump inhibitors. Also, questionnaires, upper digestive endoscopy with biopsies, barium radiography, ambulatory monitoring of esophageal pH, pH-impedance and esophageal manometry are widely used. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has a good specificity, but a low sensitivity for GERD. Also, the GERQ questionnaire has a good sensitivity and specificity in the accuracy of GERD diagnostic. Barium swallow use belongs to the past, and is recommended mostly for the detection of anatomical anomalies and not for the diagnosis of reflux disease. 24-hour ambulatory monitoring of esophageal pH is the study of choice to confirm the diagnosis of reflux disease in patients without endoscopic modifications suggestive of GERD. The association of impedance to esophageal pH monitoring is the gold standard for diagnosing GERD, making it possible to differentiate between acid reflux, weakly acid and non-acid episodes, and is also useful for diagnosing other conditions that mimic the GERD's clinical symptoms.

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena-Roxana Săraru ◽  
Vlad Enciu ◽  
Razvan Peagu ◽  
Carmen Fierbinţeanu-Braticevici

AbstractGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is considered one of the most frequent chronic gastrointestinal diseases globally with high costs due to treatment and investigations.First line therapy is with proton pump inhibitors, those who do not respond to initial treatment usually require further investigations such as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or ambulatory 24-hours esophageal pH monitoring. The total time of exposure to acid and the DeMeester score represent the most useful parameters associated with conventional pH-metry, because they can identify gastroesophageal reflux disease.Although pH-metry is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease, new impedance-based parameters have been introduced in recent years with the role of increasing the accuracy of diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease and characterizing the type of reflux. The development of multichannel intraluminal pH-impedance has improved the ability to detect and quantify gastroesophageal reflux. New parameters such as post-reflux swallowing peristaltic wave (PSPW) index and the mean nocturnal basal impedance (MNBI) have recently been introduced to assess GERD phenotypes more accurately. This review evaluates current GERD diagnotic tools while also taking a brief look at newer diagnostic parameters like PSPW and MNBI.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-71
Author(s):  
Oleksandra Slobodianiuk

Slobodianiuk O.L.In recent years much attention has been paid to the upper digestive tract diseases in children, particularly GERD, as a reason t,hat has an impact on quality of life even in children of school age and thereafter in young adults. Scientists came to a consensus that all examinations which are used in pediatric practice must be maximally available, simple and non-invasive to the extent practical for child’s condition.The question about practicability of performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy for all patients with complaints of heartburn and with other symptoms of GERD, the question relative to performing ultrasonography of the esophagus for children as an additional method of examination, usage of questionnaire in pediatric practice, formation of disease course prediction algorithm, and identification of preventive measures specific to every patient remain open.Therefore the goal of this research is to provide an overview of modern literature with reference to problematic issues of clinical evidence, risk factors, diagnostics, prediction of gastroesophageal reflux disease course in children of different age (regarding main causative and pathogenic factors, clinical evidence (esophageal and extra-esophageal), diagnostic methods and modern approaches to gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment).Key words: gastroesophageal reflux disease, non-invasive diagnostics, risk factors, prediction of disease course. СУЧАСНІ ПОГЛЯДИ НА ГЕРХ У ДІТЕЙ: ПРОБЛЕМИ ТА ПЕРСПЕКТИВИСлободянюк О.Л.Останнім часом багато уваги приділяється захворюванням верхніх відділів травного тракту у дітей, зокрема й ГЕРХ,  як причині, що призводить до порушення якості життя вже у дітей шкільного віку, а в подальшому і у людей молодого віку. Вчені дійшли консенсусу, що всі обстеження, які використовуються в педіатричній практиці повинні бути максимально доступними, простими та неінвазивними, наскільки це дозволяє стан дитини.Залишається відкритим питання про доцільність проведення ФЕГДС всім пацієнтам зі скаргами на печію та іншими симптомами ГЕРХ , питання щодо застосування УЗД стравоходу у дітей як додаткового методу обстеження, використання опитувальників в педіатричній практиці, формування алгоритмів прогнозування перебігу захворювання та визначення профілактичних заходів  індивідуально для кожного пацієнта.Отже, метою цієї роботи було виконати огляд сучасної літератури з проблемних питань клінічних проявів, факторів ризику, діагностики, прогнозування перебігу гастроезофагеальної рефлексної хвороби у дітей різного віку (з питань основних етіологічних та патогенетичних факторів, клінічних проявів (стравохідних та позастравохідних), методів діагностики та сучасних підходів до лікування гастроезофагеальної рефлексної хвороби).Ключові слова: гастроезофагеальна рефелюксна хвороба, неінвазивна діагностика, фактори ризику, прогнозування перебігу.  СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ВЗГЛЯДЫ НА ГЕРБ У ДЕТЕЙ: ПРОБЛЕМЫ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫСлободянюк А.Л.В последнее время больше внимания уделяется заболеванием верхних отделов пищеварительного тракта у детей, в том числе и ГЭРБ, как причине, которая приводит к нарушению качества жизни уже у детей школьного возраста, а в дальнейшем и у людей молодого возраста. Ученые пришли к консенсусу, что все обследования, которые используются в педиатрической практике должны быть максимально доступными, простыми и неинвазивными, насколько это позволяет состояние ребенка. Остается открытым вопрос о целесообразности проведения ФЭГДС всем пациентам с жалобами на изжогу и другими симптомами ГЭРБ, вопросы применения УЗИ пищевода у детей в качестве дополнительного метода обследования, использование опросников в педиатрической практике, формирование алгоритмов прогнозирования течения заболевания и определения профилактических мероприятий индивидуально для каждого пациента.Итак, целью этой работы было выполнить обзор современной литературы по проблемным вопросам клинических проявлений, факторов риска, диагностики, прогнозирования течения гастроэзофагеальной рефлексной болезни у детей разного возраста (по вопросам основных этиологических и патогенетических факторов, клинических проявлений (пищеводных и внепищеводных), методов диагностики и современных подходов к лечению гастроэзофагеальной рефлексной болезни).Ключевые слова: гастроэзофагеальная рефелюксная болезнь, неинвазивная диагностика, факторы риска, прогнозирование течения.


2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. 66-72
Author(s):  
V. S. Kropochev ◽  
S. V. Morozov ◽  
M. A. Lantseva ◽  
A. N. Sasunova ◽  
V. I. Pilipenko ◽  
...  

Aim. To evaluate nutritional patterns in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) compared to the control group without GERD. Materials and methods. The data of complex examination of patients referred to perform esophageal pH-impedance recording and who gave written informed consent to participate in the study served as a source data. All the participants underwent complex examination, including clinical data (presence of heartburn and acid regurgitation), symptom evaluation (GERD-Q questionnaire), esophagogastroscopy, esophageal pH-impedance recordings and food frequency questionnaire. Diagnosis of GERD was based on GERD-Q score 8, acid exposure time 6%, number of gastroesophageal refluxes 80/day by 24-hrs esophageal pH-impedance recordings. Nutritional patterns were assessed with the use of healthy eating pyramid principles. Results. Overall 165 patients were enrolled and the data of 150 of them (34 with confirmed GERD and 116 of the control group) were available for the final analysis. The patients of the both groups consumed lower compared to the recommended amounts of dairy and higher amounts of meat. Those with GERD consumed larger amounts of fruits (0.910.68 compared to the values of healthy eating pyramid vs 0.520.57 in the control group, p=0.001), and fats (0.690.55 vs 0.490.55, p=0.001). Compared to the controls, patients with GERD consumed lower amounts of vegetables (0.860.46 of the healthy eating pyramid vs 0.940.63 in the control group, р=0.004) and sugars confectionaries (0.380.39 vs 1.930.98, p=0.0001). Conclusion. Nutritional patterns of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease significantly differ compared to the control group. The obtained data may be used for diet modification in patients with arterial hypertension.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 2668-2670
Author(s):  
Alina Mihaela Elisei ◽  
Dana Tutunaru ◽  
Camelia Ana Grigore ◽  
Ciprian Adrian Dinu ◽  
Laura Florescu ◽  
...  

Analysis of esophageal pH is useful and recommended by specialists when the gastroesophageal reflux disease does not show specific symptoms such as chest pain or burnings, but a form of asthma and chronic cough. The investigation is performed after a mild anesthesia, inserting a thin and flexible catheter in the patient�s nostril; it reaches the esophagus, particularly the esophageal sphincter that connects the stomach to the esophagus. The catheter has a sensor that monitors the acidity level, the number of reflux episodes, their duration and the part of the esophagus reached by the acid in the stomach. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is frequently met in pediatric practice, rooting in the intrauterine life, a physiologic phenomenon in infants during the first semester of life.


2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (11) ◽  
pp. E1468-E1473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruhiro Inoue ◽  
Yusuke Fujiyoshi ◽  
Mary Raina Angeli Abad ◽  
Enrique Rodriguez de Santiago ◽  
Kazuya Sumi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aim Hiatal hernia and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) dysfunction play major roles in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) pathogenesis. We developed a novel endoscopic assessment to evaluate the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of this method for the diagnostic prediction of GERD. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with GERD symptoms who underwent gastroscopy and esophageal pH-impedance monitoring was conducted. The novel assessment evaluated the following in retroflex view: 1) Cardiac Opening (CO): diameter of the opening of the cardia, 2) Sliding Hernia (SH): length from the diaphragmatic crus to the squamocolumnar junction, 3) Scope Holding Time% (SHT%): the percentage of time that the Scope Holding Sign (SHS) was observed out of 30 seconds. The SHS is defined as the lower esophagus holding the endoscope under excessive insufflation. The results of this assessment and that of pH-impedance monitoring were compared. Results In total, 61 patients (mean age ± SD, 54.1 ± 16.4 years, 32 males) were enrolled. CO and SH were significantly correlated with acid exposure time (AET) (ρ = 0.36, P = 0.005, and ρ = 0.36, P = 0.004). The optimal cutoff of CO for AET > 6 % was 3 cm (Sensitivity = 72.4 %, Specificity = 46.9 %, AUC = 0.64) and that of SH was 2 cm (Sensitivity = 55.2 %, Specificity = 75.0 %, AUC = 0.70). When the population was stratified according to this cutoff, patients with CO > 3 cm and those with SH > 2 cm presented higher AET (15.1 vs 4.1 %, P = 0.037, and 23.0 vs 3.6 %, P = 0.026). Optimal cutoff of SHT% for the number of all reflux episodes > 80 was 75 % (Sensitivity = 81.8 %, Specificity = 54.6%, AUC = 0.67). Patients with SHT% < 75 % presented a higher number of all reflux episodes (88 vs 65, P = 0.014). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SHT% < 75 % for all reflux episodes > 80 were 81.8 % (95 %CI: 67.7 – 91.8), 54.5% (95 %CI: 40.4 – 64.5), and 68.2 % (95 %CI: 54.0 – 78.1). Conclusion This novel endoscopic assessment of GEJ significantly predicted the presence of GERD and merits further testing in future studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document