Does Sleeve Gastrectomy Worsen Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Obese Patients? A Prospective Study

Background To evaluate the impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and gastric bypass (LGB) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods GERD was evaluated by the Modified Italian Gastroesophageal reflux disease—Health-Related Quality of Life (MI-GERD-HRQL) questionnaire, pH-manometry, endoscopy, and Rx-esophagogram, before and 12 months after surgery. Based on these exams, patients without GERD underwent LSG, and patients with GERD underwent LGB. Results Thirteen and six patients underwent LSG and LGB, respectively. After LSG, the only statistically significant difference observed at pH-manometry was the median DeMeester score, from 5.7 to 22.7 (P = .0026). De novo GERD occurred in 6 patients (46.2%), with erosive esophagitis in one. The median MI-GERD-HRQL score improved from 3 to 0. Overall, nine patients underwent LGB, but three were lost to follow-up. Preoperative pH-manometry changed the surgical indication from LSG to LGB in 7 out of 9 patients (77.8%). Six patients who underwent LGB completed the study, and at pH-manometry, statistically significant differences were observed in the percentage of total acid exposure time, with the number of reflux episodes lasting >5 minutes and DeMeester score (P = .009). The median MI-GERD-HRQL score improved from 6.5 to 0. Statistically significant differences were not observed at endoscopy and Rx-esophagogram findings in both groups. Conclusions LSG has a negative impact on GERD, even in patients without preoperative GERD. LGB confirmed to be the intervention of choice in patients with GERD. Preoperative pH-manometry may identify patients with silent GERD, to candidate them to LGB rather than LSG. pH-manometry should be used more liberally to establish the correct surgical indication on objective grounds.

P-BN40 Fundoplication following lung transplant: A retrospective cohort analysis

Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in patients receiving a lung transplant has been associated with worsened graft function and decreased survival. This analysis aimed to identify whether fundoplication following lung transplant can improve graft function and overall survival. Methods patients undergoing lung transplantation between January 1993 and January 2020 were included. Data on oesophageal pH, manometry testing, post-transplant lung function testing and overall survival were collected. Cox-regression testing was used to analyse associations between oesophageal manometry and pH testing, fundoplication and overall survival. Results Of 345 patients who underwent a lung transplant, 20 patients also received fundoplication. 84 patients received oesopageal pH and manometry testing. Abnormal manometry was recorded in 41 patients. Average Demeester score was 28.45 for patients not receiving fundoplication and 37.28 for those receiving fundoplication. Average pre-operative reflux time was 8.6% for those not receiving fundoplication and 10.3% for those receiving fundoplication. Of 20 fundoplications, 4 were carried out within 1 year of transplant and 12 within 2 years. 1 patient had a post-operative complication following fundoplication. 13 of 20 patients had a positive response to fundoplication, defined as a less than 10% decrease in FEV1 lung function at 2 years. Receiving fundoplication was associated with better overall survival (p = 0.024) as was total reflux time <7% (p = 0.21). Conclusions Fundoplication is a safe operation after lung transplant with good outcomes. Fundoplication was associated with better overall survival on cox-regression analysis.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and salivary pepsin in patients with heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus

Summary Background Heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus (HGMUE) is reported to be related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study investigated the prevalence of GERD and the use of salivary pepsin to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux, especially proximal reflux, in HGMUE patients. Methods One hundred and fifty-three HGMUE patients and 50 healthy volunteers were studied. All subjects took a reflux symptom index questionnaire (RSI); underwent endoscopy, barium esophagogram, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH-metry (MII-pH); and salivary pepsin test. Results Ninety-five (62.1%) HGMUE patients but no control subjects were diagnosed with GERD. The salivary pepsin concentration, RSI score, DeMeester score, acid exposure time (AET), total reflux episodes, proximal acidic reflux episodes, and proximal weakly acidic reflux episodes were significantly higher in the HGMUE group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The salivary pepsin test showed a sensitivity of 85.9% and specificity of 56.9% for diagnosing GERD using the optimal cut-off value of 75 ng/mL. One hundred and seven (69.9%) and 46 (30.1%) HGMUE patients were categorized as pepsin (+) and pepsin (−), respectively when 75 ng/mL was used as a cut-off value. Male sex, RSI, AET, and proximal acid reflux episodes were positive predictive factors for the occurrence of pepsin (+) in HGMUE patients. Conclusions GERD, especially GERD with proximal acid reflux and related symptoms, was common in HGMUE patients. The salivary pepsin test could be an additional useful test for testing reflux in HGMUE patients, but it will not replace the MII-pH.

Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Outcomes in Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Introduction: Outcomes of laparoscopic procedures for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are variable depending on surgical expertise and/or patient-related factors. Some procedures may be inadequate in patients with severe disease. Effectiveness of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has not been extensively tested in patients with severe disease.Methods: A prospectively collected database was analyzed to identify patients who underwent MSA at a single institution. Individuals who had previous esophago-gastric surgery were excluded. Severe GERD was defined as lower esophageal sphincter pressure <5 mmHg, distal esophageal amplitude <30 mmHg, Barrett's metaplasia, stricture or grade C-D esophagitis, and/or DeMeester score >50. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe GERD were compared with those of patients with mild to moderate GERD who served as control group.Results: Over the study period, a total of 336 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 102 (30.4%) had severe GERD. The median follow-up was 24 months (IQR = 75) in severe GERD patients and 32 months (IQR = 84) in those with non-severe GERD. Patients with severe GERD had a higher rate of dysphagia and higher GERD-HRQL scores. After the MSA procedure, symptoms, health-related quality of life scores, and proton-pump inhibitors consumption significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.05). No difference between groups was found in the prevalence of severe post-operative dysphagia, the need for endoscopic dilation or device removal, and the DeMeester score.Conclusion: Laparoscopic MSA is safe and effective in reducing symptoms, PPI use, and esophageal acid exposure also in patients with severe GERD.

Is belching increasing after bariatric bypass surgery in the long term period?

Background and aims: Gastric bypass surgery effectively treats obesity; however, its association with belching, which occurs in other bariatric surgeries, remains unclear. Hence, we aimed to evaluate belching occurrence after gastric bypass surgery. Methods: We enrolled 12 healthy volunteers and 17 patients (12 and 5 underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and mini-gastric bypass surgeries 24 (18–54) months prior, respectively). Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed. Gastroscopy was performed, followed by the 24-hour pH-impedance analysis. Results: Age and sex were not statistically different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Patients had a significantly higher mean DeMeester score than the healthy controls (9.11 ± 19.40 vs. 6.04 ± 5.60, P = 0.048), but the pathologic acid reflux (DeMeester score > 14) rate was similar in both groups (11.8% vs. 8.3%). Regarding the impedance, symptom-association probability was positive in 11.8% of patients. The patients also had higher alkaline reflux rates (6% vs. 0%); additionally, 50% of them experienced belching based on the questionnaire, and 25% had esophagitis based on gastroscopy. Furthermore, patients had a significantly higher number of gas reflux (123.24 ± 80 vs. 37.2 ± 21.5, P = 0.001) and supragastric/ gastric belches (182 ± 64/228 ± 66.69 vs. 25.08 ± 15.20/12.17 ± 17.65, P = 0.001). Supragastric belching was more frequent than gastric belching in the controls, whereas gastric belching was more frequent in the patients. Conclusion: Belching increases after gastric bypass surgery in a long-term period. Gastric belching was more frequent than supragastric belching in these patients.

TP6.2.14 Outcome of POEM (Per-oral endoscopic myotomy) for achalasia

Aims Laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy (LHM) has been the surgical gold standard for treatment of oesophageal achalasia. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been proposed as an alternative technique. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of POEM for achalasia in our unit. Methods We have operated on 202 patients for oesophageal achalasia since 2005: 107 had LHM, 86 had POEM, and 9 had an oesophagectomy. We assessed the clinical outcome of POEM comparing pre- and postoperative endoscopic, radiologic and manometric findings, as well as Eckardt-, GERD- and DsQoL score for achalasia. All follow-up patients were offered endoscopy. Results Data were completed for the first 45 POEM patients. The average age was 45 years. 18 patients (40%) had prior achalasia treatment. The median hospital stay was 2 days (2-5). There was no mortality, but 4 patients (9%) had post-operative complications. The median follow-up was 24 months (12-49). Clinical success (Eckardt score ≤ 3) was achieved in 39 patients (87%). Thirteen patients (29%) were taking PPIs for chest symptoms. Eleven of these underwent pH studies of whom only 1 had a DeMeester score > 14.5. Of the 24 patients who had post-operative endoscopy, 40% was diagnosed with oesophagitis grade A, yet only 5 of them were symptomatic. Conclusions POEM appears to be safe and effective and warrants consideration as first-line therapy in expert achalasia centres. Longer term randomized studies comparing the outcomes of POEM with LHM and pneumatic dilatation will determine its place in the treatment of achalasia.

558 OUTCOMES OF PER ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY IN ACHALASIA IN PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE ESOPHAGUS

Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a favorable alterative to Heller myotomy for achalasia. However data is limited on the effectiveness in palliation of symptoms in patients who have an esophagus with a sigmoid/tortuous configuration, or a mega-esophagus with width more than 5 cm, due to long-standing achalasia. Our objective is to investigate the outcomes after POEM procedure in patients diagnosed with achalasia and considered end-stage. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a large hospital between April 2014 and July 2019. A total of 504 patients were identified with 218 undergoing POEM during the study time period of which 57 patients had a sigmoid or tortuous esophagus, and/or had a barium column width of more than 5 cm on timed barium esophagograms (TBE). Primary outcome was symptom relief during follow-up, defined as a post-operative Eckardt score ≤ 3. We also explored integrated resting pressure (IRP) on manometry, barium column height and width on TBE, complications and procedure related parameters. Statistical analyses were performed using R. Results Significant decrease in median Eckardt scores were observed, 7.5 [6,8.8] pre-operatively to 0 [0,1] at 2 months (p < 0.001). At 2 years, 12 of 14 patients (85%), reported scores of ≤3. Improvements at 2 months were noted in median IRP (25.4 mmHg [15.5, 35.9] vs. 4.0 mmHg [2.2,9.0]), 1 min TBE height (11.5 cm [7.5,15.0] vs. 6.8 cm [4.7,9.0]) and width (5.0 cm [4.1,6.1] vs. 2.8 cm [1.9,3.1]), p < 0.001. At 2 years, they were 9.5 cm [5,12.8] and 3.0 cm [2.4,4.5], respectively. Post-operative pH studies in 35(61%) patients demonstrated a DeMeester score ≥ 14.72 in 17(49%) patients. Almost all patients reported return to activities of daily living within 7 days. Conclusion POEM is an effective and safe modality in achalasia patients with end-stage esophagus. Patients in this cohort historically have had poor outcome to interventions and our data shows excellent short-to-medium term outcome with low morbidity after POEM. Given its efficacy, minimal invasiveness and short return to function, POEM is a reasonable first and gold standard palliative therapy in this difficult cohort and should be attempted before considering esophagectomy.

794 DOES TRACHEOSTOMY PREDISPOSE GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX?

Lung diseases have a strong relationship with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It has been previously demonstrated that conditions such as tracheal stenosis, asthma and even lung transplantation may worsen with reflux and these patients have few symptoms of GERD. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of people who needed mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy increased. Our objective was to demonstrate the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with tracheostomy and describe its characteristics. Methods Esophageal manometry and 24 h pH-metry was performed in 137 consecutive patients with a tracheostomy already in a chronic phase, independent of symptoms. Inquire on respiratory and digestive symptoms was also carried out at the time of the examination. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux was identified in this population and description of the groups with reflux and without it, as well as comparison between them. Results Of the 137 patients, 49 were male, the average age was 40.94 ± 17.3 and the body mass index was 26.3 ± 4.85. The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux was 45.2%. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups with and without reflux. In the reflux group, the mean DeMeester score was 36.5 ± 20.8 and the presence of lower sphincter hypotonia was found in only 31% of the patients and was not correlated with reflux between the groups (p = 0.285). Regarding the symptoms, 48% had heartburn symptoms and only 30% had a combination of typical symptoms (heartburn + regurgitation). Conclusion The presence of tracheostomy is related to an increased prevalence of reflux, even without typical symptoms most of the time. The mechanism for this is still unknown, perhaps the altered respiratory dynamics has a role. These patients should be investigated with functional exams if they develop any condition that may be affected by reflux.

Is transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) an answer to post-peroral endoscopic myotomy gastroesophageal reflux? A multicenter retrospective study

Background: The use of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia has a high incidence of post-procedural gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) may be an ideal endoscopic treatment. We report our experience with the use of post-POEM TIF. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, post-POEM patients with GER who underwent TIF were included. The study end points were: (i) technical success; (ii) safety; (iii) effectiveness (changes in symptoms, scores, proton pump inhibitor [PPI] use, pH studies). Results: 12 patients underwent TIF after POEM, nine of whom had daily symptoms, with 91.7% requiring twice daily (BID) PPIs. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Two adverse events occurred. There were significant decreases in the percentage of patients on BID PPIs (P = 0.03), frequency of daily symptoms (P = 0.03), Reflux Severity Index questionnaire, and GERD Health-related Quality of Life scores (P = 0.03 and P = 0.003; n = 6). pH studies performed in seven of the patients showed a significant reduction in the mean DeMeester score (P = 0.05) and mean percentage acid exposure time (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Our experience suggests that TIF may be effective and safe in treating GER after POEM. Larger prospective trials are needed.