scholarly journals Evaluation of Transition to Updated Regional Q-Geoid Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 65-75
Author(s):  
J. Kaminskis ◽  
A. Vallis ◽  
I. Stamure ◽  
M. Reiniks ◽  
I. Geipele ◽  
...  

Abstract During the last years, the European and the Nordic quasi-geoid models and existing national q-geoid models covered the territory of Latvia. There are many ways for comparison and tests of results achieved. Scientists and professionals can compare models directly at some special geodetic co-location stations or use GNSS/levelling sites. The results of this research can be used by scientists and specialists in the fundamental geodetic observations for independent monitoring of existing q-geoid models and evaluation of accuracy. The research aims at evaluating the transition to the best updated regional q-geoid model. The research objectives are the following: 1) to investigate and analyse the development of q-geoid model LV14; 2) to conduct precision research; 3) to assess the challenges of the European Vertical Reference System; 4) to draw conclusions that allow for further research in this area for development and improvement. Within the framework of the research, the authors have used a variety of research methods. Historical and logical approaches, comparative analysis and synthesis methods, as well as inductive – deductive data analysis methods have been selected for the research. A conclusion for such kind of studies is to implement the most appropriate q-geoid solution and to develop new astrogeodetic methods for unification, monitoring and for reliability of a geodetic reference network.

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (33) ◽  
pp. 4783-4789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Mabbott ◽  
Yun Xu ◽  
Royston Goodacre

Reproducibility of SERS signal acquired from thin films developed in-house and commercially has been assessed using seven data analysis methods.


2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. e22-e23
Author(s):  
Karen A. Monsen ◽  
Karen S. Martin ◽  
Bonnie L Westra

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip E. Higuera ◽  
Daniel G. Gavin ◽  
Patrick J. Bartlein ◽  
Douglas J. Hallett

Over the past several decades, high-resolution sediment–charcoal records have been increasingly used to reconstruct local fire history. Data analysis methods usually involve a decomposition that detrends a charcoal series and then applies a threshold value to isolate individual peaks, which are interpreted as fire episodes. Despite the proliferation of these studies, methods have evolved largely in the absence of a thorough statistical framework. We describe eight alternative decomposition models (four detrending methods used with two threshold-determination methods) and evaluate their sensitivity to a set of known parameters integrated into simulated charcoal records. Results indicate that the combination of a globally defined threshold with specific detrending methods can produce strongly biased results, depending on whether or not variance in a charcoal record is stationary through time. These biases are largely eliminated by using a locally defined threshold, which adapts to changes in variability throughout a charcoal record. Applying the alternative decomposition methods on three previously published charcoal records largely supports our conclusions from simulated records. We also present a minimum-count test for empirical records, which reduces the likelihood of false positives when charcoal counts are low. We conclude by discussing how to evaluate when peak detection methods are warranted with a given sediment–charcoal record.


2014 ◽  
Vol 439 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja von der Linden ◽  
Mark T. Allen ◽  
Douglas E. Applegate ◽  
Patrick L. Kelly ◽  
Steven W. Allen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anahid Ehtemami ◽  
Rollin Scott ◽  
Shonda Bernadin

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 014005 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Peters ◽  
J Griffié ◽  
D J Williamson ◽  
J Aaron ◽  
S Khuon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document