Application of the Single Access Technique in Laparoscopic Surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Strzałka ◽  
Maciej Matyja ◽  
Maciej Matłok ◽  
Marcin Migaczewski ◽  
Piotr Budzyński ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aziz M. Merchant ◽  
Michael W. Cook ◽  
Brent C. White ◽  
S. Scott Davis ◽  
John F. Sweeney ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 401 (6) ◽  
pp. 909-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selman Uranues ◽  
Orhan Veli Ozkan ◽  
Gordana Tomasch

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siripong Sirikurnpiboon ◽  
Paiboon Jivapaisarnpong

Introduction. Single-access laparoscopic surgery (SALS) has been successfully introduced for colectomy surgery; however, for mid to low rectum procedures such as total mesorectal excision, it can be technically complicated. In this study, we introduced a single-access technique for rectum cancer operations without the use of other instruments.Aims. To show the short-term results of single-access laparoscopic rectal surgery in terms of pathologic results and immediate complications.Settings and Design. Prospective study.Materials and Methods. We selected middle rectum to anal canal cancer patients to undergo single-access laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer. All patients had total mesorectal excisions. An umbilical incision was made for the insertion of a single multichannel port, and a mesocolic window was created to identify the inferior mesenteric artery and vein. Total mesorectal excision was performed. There were no perioperative complications. The mean operative time was 269 minutes; the median hospital stay was 7 days; the mean wound size was 5.5 cm; the median number of harvested lymph nodes was 15; and all patients had intact mesorectal capsules.Statistical Analysis Used. Mean, minimum–maximum.Conclusion. Single-access laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is feasible while oncologic principles and patient safety are maintained.


Author(s):  
Atmajit Singh Dhillon

Background: Open access technique for laparoscopic surgery is used by the surgeons routinely, for gaining intraabdominal access safely, but is somehow underutilised by gynaecologists. The most important and dangerous part of laparoscopic surgery is while gaining access to the abdominal cavity, especially in the obese, thin and in patients with previous abdominal scars. Various access techniques have been described including Hasson and Fielding technique, transvaginal or transuterine insufflation, alternative sites for introducing Veress needle abdominally and insufflations with an optical trocar. Open access technique can minimize visceral and vascular injuries and ensures quick and easy intra-abdominal access.Methods: 250 patients were taken up for laparoscopic surgery at tertiary care service hospitals for open access technique for laparoscopic surgery for a variety of indications. The spectrum of patients ranged from thin, obese, single and multiple transverse scarsResults: A total of 250 patients, were taken up for laparoscopic surgery with the open access method successfully. The median age of the patients was 32 years, there were 77 patients (31%), with previous transverse laparotomy incisions. Median time for access was 100 seconds, and in 102 patients, there was prolonged access time ranging from 150-300 seconds, 37 (36%) of these patients were those with previous multiple transverse laparotomies and 65 (64%), patients were obese. There were no intra-abdominal organ or vascular injuries. Skin incisions healed well.Conclusions: This study describes the open access technique in patients, with transverse laparotomy scars and especially useful in thin and obese women, and where the chances of vascular and visceral injuries can be high while gaining intra - abdominal access. It is safe, effective, easy to learn and requires minimal instrumentation and can be used in the vast majority of the gynaecological cases.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Siripong Sirikurnpiboon

Introduction. Innovative laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer can be classified into 2 types: firstly, new instruments such as robotic surgery and secondly, new technique such as single-access laparoscopic surgery (SALS) and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Most reports of SALS for rectal cancer have shown pathologic outcomes comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS); however, SALS is considered to be superior to CLS in terms of lower levels of discomfort and faster recovery rates. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes of the two approaches. Methods. From 2011 to 2014, 84 cases of adenocarcinoma of the rectum and anal canal were enrolled. The operations were anterior, low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resections. Data collected included postoperative outcomes. The oncological outcomes recorded included 3-year and 5-year survival, local recurrence, and metastasis. Results. SALS was performed on 41 patients, and CLS was utilized in 43 cases. The demographic data of the two groups were similar. Intraoperative volumes of blood loss and conversion rates were similar, but operative time was longer in the SALS group. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications or pathological outcomes. The oncologic results were similar in terms of 3-year survival (100% and 97.7%; p  = 1.00), 5-year survival (78.0% and 86.0%; p  = 0.401), local recurrence rates (19.5% vs 11.6%, p  = 0.376), and metastasis rates (19.5% vs 11.6%; p  = 0.376) for SALS and CLS, respectively. Conclusion. SALS and CLS for rectal and anal cancer had comparable pathological and survival results, but SALS showed some superior benefits in the early postoperative period.


Videoscopy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Selman Uranues ◽  
Orhan Veli Ozkan ◽  
Gordana Tomasch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document