scholarly journals Form of Abuse of The Position of Notary in Participations for Making a Sales Buying Agreement Which Causes Loss

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-261
Author(s):  
M.Haris Aulia Riski ◽  
Hasim Purba ◽  
Suprayitno Suprayitno ◽  
T.Keizerina Devi A
Keyword(s):  

As a public official, a notary has to implement the provisions in article 16 paragraph (1) letter of the Notarial Act in performing his position to prepare autenthic deeds; a notary is also obliged to act honestly, be independent, be impartial and secure interest of the parties concerned in the authentic deeds prepared by the notary; which is watched and witnessed by all parties so that their aims are set forth in the deeds.

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 421
Author(s):  
Amalia Putri Prima Erdian ◽  
Arief Cholil

Law of inheritance only happens because the person died. In BW there are two ways to get wealth, that is: as heirs according to the provisions of law and as a person appointed in the will. What is meant by the will itself according to Article 875 BW is an agreement that make statements about what he wished someone would happen after he died, and that by her to pull back. In general, people make a will before a Public Notary. According to article 1 paragraph 1 of Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning On Notary (now referred to UUJN). Notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic agreements and other authorities referred to in the Act, where each testament must be shaped agreement in order to obtain certainty law as an authentic agreement binding. With the creation of the will meant that the parties can understand and be able to know the basic result of the offense can be arranged so that the interests of the concerned receive proper protection as known by the Notary.Keywords: Inheritance; Heir; Testament; Authentic Agreement


1981 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varda Eker

Corruption is a wide-spread phenomenon in the developing world. The term is usually reserved for ‘the practice of using the power of office for making private gain in breach of laws and regulations nominally in force’, or as more flamboyantly defined by M. McMullan, ‘a public official is corrupt if he accepts money…for doing something that he is under duty to do anyway, that he is under duty not to do, or to exercise a legitimate discretion for improper reasons’.1 Corruption is thus a description of activites emanating from and related to officialdom. Irregular activities among private individuals are a matter of private enterprise. They are not usually classified as corruption, but as straightforward theft, fraud, embezzlement, and the like.


Author(s):  
Bustomi Bustomi

Every nation has different cultural character that initially influences different daily conversation. The culture which means a characteristic and knowledge of a particular group of people encompassing language, religion, and social habit is often used by almost society. It is very much related to the language. Due to natural phenomenon in daily life, something appears in a culture can be reviewed in language. This article is aimed at finding out phenomena of using the Indonesian language which considerably reflects culture of Indonesian societies in thinking and doing something.This study is a qualitative research in nature of which collecting data used is sociolinguistics approach. The data is collected by conducting deep interview and recording spoken and written utterance in natural situation. The result of this study shows that the culture adhering in daily activity of this nation can be detected in daily communication  culture. There are many negative cultural utterances reflect negative culture of our nation, namely low self-esteem, irresponsiblity, hidding self-identity, and being a follower of whatever is going on. Seeing the data, it needs cultural improvisation of possitive communication among social interaction.  Hence, The role of goverment, educator, mass-media, public official, and public figure are absolutely needed .


Author(s):  
Rahmayanti Rahmayanti

Corruption is a serious problem because it can endanger the stability and security of society, destroy democratic values and morality, and endanger economic, socio-political development, and create massive poverty so that it needs attention from the government and society and social institutions. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the sanctions arrangements for corruption in the abuse of office and the return of assets resulting from corruption against criminal acts of abuse of office based on Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Eradication. The research that was conducted was juridical normative, the data source used to support this research was secondary data sources. The return of assets from corruption has occupied an important position in eradicating corruption. a criminal act of corruption is an act directly related to the authority (bevoegheid), the right to rule or act as the power of a public official to comply with the rule of law in the scope of carrying out public obligations. The return of assets is based on the principles of social justice which gives the ability, duty and responsibility to state institutions and legal institutions to provide protection and opportunities for individuals in society to achieve prosperity, so that this is in line with the objectives of the State as specified in UUD 1945. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document