public official
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

377
(FIVE YEARS 152)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Khairunnisa Noor Asufie ◽  
Ali Impron

<span>Notary has two sides were attached, namely as an individual Indonesian citizens and public officials appointed by the competent authority. As a Notary as a holder of the office of Notary who performs duties as a public official appointed by an authorized official. Notary as an individual has a position as an Indonesian Citizen based on his personal identity as an Indonesian Citizen. The legal protection provided to the Notary is based on the position of the Notary as a public official appointed by an authorized public official, not legal protection as an individual Indonesian Citizen. Although the two are attached together but related to legal protection, there is a separation of the two positions. Legal protection of Notaries as individual Indonesian Citizens has been regulated by regulations already in Indonesia and related to the human rights of individual Indonesian Citizens while legal protection of Notaries as public officials is a topic of discussion that will be discussed further. Discuss the legal protection for Notaries in the performance of their duties by reviewing based on the principle of proportionality. Legal protection for Notaries in the performance of their office is now something important because many Notaries are criminalized in the performance of their office. The research method used for this research is normative research. This research is a <em>prescriptive analysis. </em>In this research, using the approach, the approach of legislation <em>(Statue Approach)</em> and conceptual approach (<em>Conceptual Approach</em>).</span>


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-130
Author(s):  
Lidia Sinaga ◽  
Madiasa Ablizar ◽  
Mahmul Siregar

Notary is a Public Official who has the authority to make authentic deed, and is required to keep everything related to the deed they make confidential. In carrying out duties and positions, a Notary is generally assisted by a notary employee in preparing everything that is needed by a Notary in making a deed. The responsibility for the authentic deed remains the responsibility of the notary,if the notary employees leaks the deed made by the notary. Notary office employees who do not maintain the confidentiality of the deed by leaking the deed may be subject to witness Article 1365 of the Civil Code.Notaries can be held civilly responsible due to negligence in maintaining the confidentiality of deeds carried out by their employees, although in this case the notary does do direct faults.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-38
Author(s):  
Marchelina Rante ◽  
Hernita Matana

A notary is an authorized public official whose main obligation is to make authentic deeds based on a professional code of ethics, related to the widespread indications of forgery of the authentic deeds, of course this needs to be accounted for by the notary himself. This study aims to identify and explain the criminal liability of a Notary against an authentic deed made and indicated forgery and to find out the legal status of a deed made by a Notary that caused a dispute. The data collection carried out in this research is by interview and literature study as well as the applicable legislation. Data were analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that if the notary is proven to have falsified or falsified the authentic deed he made and caused harm to interested parties, the notary can be sentenced to criminal, civil, and administrative sanctions. The legal status of the deed that is proven to be falsified by the Notary who made it, which can be canceled, null and void, has the power of proof as an underhand deed, canceled by the parties themselves and canceled by a court decision that has permanent legal force. However, the status or position of the Notary deed can’t be carried out jointly, but only applies to one, in accordance with a permanent court decision.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Sarah Burgess

<p>Across the years 1887 to 1926, at a time when the British Empire was at its height, nine governors and their wives took up vice-regal office in New Zealand. This study is concerned with the public enactment of the position of vice-regal wives’ in New Zealand in these years. It explores what it meant for a woman to be a public figure with a prominent profile and at the same time a wife within a marriage during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In doing so, the thesis looks at three distinct aspects of vice-regal life, as played out in public: official vice-regal ceremony and social life; involvement in voluntary welfare and women’s imperialist organisations; and the display of vice-regal life through governors’ wives’ appearance and the furnishing of Government House. Of key concern is the way in which these aspects of vice-regal life are conveyed to the public through newspapers, and so Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity is considered as a way to think about the position occupied by governors’ wives.  As women married to men in public office, governors’ wives occupied a particular position and space within the British Empire in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The position was defined and created through marriage and through the enactment of the duties of vice-regal office. Governors' wives were present at vice-regal ceremonies and social events as both witnesses and wives; they involved themselves with voluntary welfare and imperialist organisations with a particular focus on women as mothers and contributors to Empire; and through their dress and the decoration of Government House governors’ wives presented a display of their suitability for holding vice-regal office. The enactment of these duties over the period from 1887 to 1926 was remarkably consistent. Alongside this a degree of change occurred in the recognition afforded to governors’ wives in the fulfilment of vice-regal office.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Sarah Burgess

<p>Across the years 1887 to 1926, at a time when the British Empire was at its height, nine governors and their wives took up vice-regal office in New Zealand. This study is concerned with the public enactment of the position of vice-regal wives’ in New Zealand in these years. It explores what it meant for a woman to be a public figure with a prominent profile and at the same time a wife within a marriage during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In doing so, the thesis looks at three distinct aspects of vice-regal life, as played out in public: official vice-regal ceremony and social life; involvement in voluntary welfare and women’s imperialist organisations; and the display of vice-regal life through governors’ wives’ appearance and the furnishing of Government House. Of key concern is the way in which these aspects of vice-regal life are conveyed to the public through newspapers, and so Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity is considered as a way to think about the position occupied by governors’ wives.  As women married to men in public office, governors’ wives occupied a particular position and space within the British Empire in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The position was defined and created through marriage and through the enactment of the duties of vice-regal office. Governors' wives were present at vice-regal ceremonies and social events as both witnesses and wives; they involved themselves with voluntary welfare and imperialist organisations with a particular focus on women as mothers and contributors to Empire; and through their dress and the decoration of Government House governors’ wives presented a display of their suitability for holding vice-regal office. The enactment of these duties over the period from 1887 to 1926 was remarkably consistent. Alongside this a degree of change occurred in the recognition afforded to governors’ wives in the fulfilment of vice-regal office.</p>


Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 47-58
Author(s):  
V. N. Borkov ◽  
E. A. Glukhov

The purpose of the study is to identify contradictions between the competence of a public official of a government body based on the post he takes, on the one hand, and the need for this official to make managerial decisions beyond his competence. On the basis of this contradiction, the authors show the negative consequences of the implementation of management activities by a public official and suggest some measures to prevent and eliminate them.The paper analyzes the cases when the heads of public authorities were supposed to accept construction and repair work performed by counterparties under civil contracts, but due to their incompetence in this matter, they signed acts of acceptance of the work performed without indicating any shortcomings, for which they were brought to criminal and financial liability. The authors describe the reasons for these negative phenomena, analyze the possibility and legitimacy of the delegation by the heads of public authorities of powers to accept the work performed and determine the subject matter of the offense.By analyzing the judicial practice, the authors determine the subjects of crimes in the field of poor-quality reception of work performed by contractors; attention is focused on the fact that in order to qualify such acts as criminal, it is not necessary to establish the intent. Officials’ references to their incompetence in this matter, as a rule, are ignored by the courts. By comparing the activities of leaders in the commercial and public spheres, the authors point to the possibility of criminal prosecution of a public official without claiming damage caused to any person and before considering a legal dispute for compensation for damage between the public authority and the counterparty. In conclusion, the authors make proposals on the need to involve third-party organizations in the acceptance of the work performed on the basis of outsourcing, which will increase the quality of activities of public authorities and reduce the level of malfeasance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-96
Author(s):  
Leonard Parulian

ABSTRACTOne form of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 that we can recognize in everyday life is electronic commerce, namely the use of communication networks and computers to carry out business processes that are agreed upon and carried out by the parties and set forth in electronic agreements/contracts. The electronic agreement/contract is carried out on the basis of trust obtained by providing legal recognition of electronic written form in the form of an electronic signature. If there is a broken promise/default by one of the parties entering into an electronic agreement/contract with electronic document evidence signed with electronic signature as evidence, then it must be known carefully the strength of the evidence of electronic agreement on the electronic document and the method of settling the civil dispute.This study aimed to examine and analyze the strength of the evidence of electronic agreements on authentic deeds and patterns of settlement of civil case disputes submitted by the parties with evidence in the form of electronic agreements. The study used a normative juridical method with legal and conceptual approaches and primary and secondary sources of legal material.From the results of the study it can be concluded that the strength of proof of electronic documents signed with electronic signatures is contrary to the strength of proof of authentic deeds made by or in front of public officials in charge where the deed was made or by the authorized public official. In addition, related to the recognition of electronic documents in the judicial system, there is a void in procedural law because it does not regulate electronic documents as evidence but rather electronic documents in the form of decisions or indictments as appeals for cassation requests and reconsideration.Keywords: Electronic Agreement, Electronic Signature, Authentic Deed, Evidence


2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 1415-1419
Author(s):  
Ungsoo Samuel Kim

Purpose: To investigate physical ophthalmological parameters relevant to job choice.Methods: I analyzed the ophthalmological demands imposed on those engaged in military service and on applicants for army officer, air force officer, naval officer, railroad officer, firefighting officer, police officer, state public officer, and pilot positions; the visual requirements for a driver’s license were also examined. Visual dysfunction was classified into loss of visual acuity, visual field defects, refractive errors, color vision disorders, strabismus, and other disorders. Additional restrictions imposed by each occupation were investigated.Results: Various standards were imposed on the occupational groups. Applicants to the Air Force Academy required 1.0 visual acuity; the visual acuity for applicants to the military and naval academies were ≥0.6, and those for fire and police personnel ≥0.8. The general public official regulations do not mention visual acuity. In terms of visual field defects, such defects must be <33% for firefighters and railroad drivers; no clear standard was set for other occupations. The importance of color vision differed by job type; pilots and railroad drivers must have full color vision. In terms of refractive error and strabismus, the standards differed among occupations.Conclusions: As the ophthalmological standards vary extensively by occupation, both ophthalmologists and clients must be aware of this information. The scientific basis of the various standards requires attention.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Yuan

How does the organizational culture of local governments influence the type and extent of procedural justice in environmental policy processes? Using the culture theory developed by Mary Douglas and others, this research seeks to bring a new conception and new measures of organizational culture to the study of policy making by local governments. To contribute to the development of the conceptualization and measurement of procedural justice in the environmental policy processes of those governments, item response theory (IRT) graded response model (GRM) is used to show variations in difficulties and frequencies of adopting distinctive public participation strategies for improving procedural justice across local governments. In this study, original survey data is collected from Illinois municipalities and a finding is suggestive of cultural variables explaining the two dimensions of procedural justice, equal and authentic public participation, while other variables can, at best, explain only the equal public participation. Furthermore, as hypothesized, egalitarianism increases both equal and authentic public participation, individualism increases equal public participation, and fatalism decreases both.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-261
Author(s):  
M.Haris Aulia Riski ◽  
Hasim Purba ◽  
Suprayitno Suprayitno ◽  
T.Keizerina Devi A
Keyword(s):  

As a public official, a notary has to implement the provisions in article 16 paragraph (1) letter of the Notarial Act in performing his position to prepare autenthic deeds; a notary is also obliged to act honestly, be independent, be impartial and secure interest of the parties concerned in the authentic deeds prepared by the notary; which is watched and witnessed by all parties so that their aims are set forth in the deeds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document