scholarly journals A Practice Based Chronic Pain Management Registry (CPMR): Structure and Content of Proposed Patient and Patient/Provider Platforms

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Paul Langley
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Physician Practices ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
Therapy Interventions ◽  
The Impact

Previous commentaries in the Formulary Evaluation section of INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy have pointed to the difficulties of establishing the credibility of trial-based and modeled claims for therapy interventions. Claims for interventions in the management of chronic pain are no exception. To meet this challenge, the Chronic Pain Management Registry (CPMR) has been designed to provide an evidence base for physician practices and health care decision makers to evaluate the impact of pain management interventions. The purpose of this commentary is to detail the development, structure and content of the CPMR in two versions: (i) a patient response version and (ii) a combined patient/provider response version. The CPMR has a potentially critical role to play in providing a framework for the effective auditing of practice compliance in the prescribing and monitoring of opioids in the management of chronic pain. The CPMR tracks, with on-line input from the patient and the treating physician, the process and outcomes of therapy interventions. These reports cover the overall pain experience of patients as well as pain intensity and functional status by eleven specific pain locations, covering both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Prior to each practice visit patients complete reports which are entered to the CPMR with a summary transmitted to the physician practice. Over time, these reports track the cumulative response to therapy as well as the perception of the patients as to whether or not the therapy has led to any substantive improvement in activity limitations, symptoms and quality of life. A particular focus of the CPMR is on monitoring and evaluating the experience with, and impact of opioid medications, to include the effectiveness of opioid formulations on reducing pain intensity and improving functional status, including an intensive assessment of the potential for and experience of opioid substance abuse for individual patients. The CPMR can also support monthly reports to the practice to summarize patient throughput, the response to care by target pain patients and profiles of opioid use and abuse. The CPMR can be customized to meet the needs of individual practices.   Article Type: Commentary

scholarly journals Meeting Physician Compliance Recommendations in the Management of Opioids in Chronic Pain: The Chronic Pain Management Registry (CPMR)

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Paul Langley
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Physician Practices ◽  
Physician Compliance ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Therapy Interventions ◽  
American Society

In a recent commentary in INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy, details were given on a recently released Chronic Pain Management Registry (CPMR). The CPMR was designed to provide a tracking and audit framework for evaluating claims made for therapy interventions in chronic pain management. At the same time, the CPMR was seen as a key element in monitoring physician and practice compliance with requirements for the prescribing of opioids and other scheduled substances. The purpose of the present commentary is to expand upon the role of the CPMR in the management of opioids in detailing the concordance of the CPMR data collection requirements with the latest recommendations of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) for responsible, safe and effective opioid prescribing in chronic non-cancer pain. Given ongoing concerns with opioid misuse and abuse, the opioid epidemic, physician practices are at risk for what may be judged as poor therapy decisions in evaluating medical necessity and a failure to monitor effectively response to therapy. Adoption of a platform such as the CPMR may, through providing a comprehensive evidence base and tracking capability, support more effective prescribing decisions and adherence to therapy.  At the same time, the ability to justify decisions through a CPMR documentation audit may not only alleviate physician concerns if their decisions are challenged but also lead to improved outcomes in the treatment of chronic pain.    Article Type: Commentary

Identifying Teaming in Chronic Pain Management Interventions in Primary Care: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 11391
Author(s):  
Karleen F. Giannitrapani ◽  
Natalie Connell ◽  
Pallavi Prathivadi ◽  
Sophia Zupanc ◽  
Hong-Nei Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Management Interventions

scholarly journals Support for osteopathic manipulative treatment inclusion in chronic pain management guidelines: a narrative review

2021 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-317
Author(s):  
Megan Franzetti ◽  
Emily Dries ◽  
Brady Stevens ◽  
Lisa Berkowitz ◽  
Sheldon C. Yao
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Medication Usage ◽  
Management Guidelines ◽  
Comparator Group ◽  
Chronic Pain Conditions

Abstract Context Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is used to treat chronic pain conditions. However, few guidelines focusing on chronic pain management include recommendations for OMT. Objectives To evaluate previous literature on the use of OMT for improving chronic pain. Methods A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed and ScienceDirect on August 26–27, 2019, using the terms “osteopathic,” “chronic,” and “pain,” yielding a total of 312 MEDLINE/PubMed articles and 515 ScienceDirect articles. Eligibility criteria required that studies investigate pain, functional status, or medication usage through an experimental design, focusing on human subjects with chronic pain who had various forms of OMT administered by osteopathically trained individuals in which the comparator group received no intervention, a sham or placebo, or conventional care. Three authors independently performed literature searches and methodically settled disagreements over article selection. Results In the 22 articles included in our study that examined OMT use in chronic pain conditions, we evaluated primary outcomes of pain (22; 100%) and functional status (20; 90.9%), and the secondary outcome of medication usage (3; 13.6%). The majority of articles showed that OMT resulted in a significant decrease in pain levels as compared to baseline pain levels or the control group (20; 90.9%) and that OMT resulted in an improvement in functional status (17; 77.3%). In articles that did not find a significant difference in pain (2; 9.1%) or functional status (3; 13.6%), there were overall outcomes improvements noted. All articles that investigated medication usage (3; 13.6%) showed that OMT was effective in decreasing patients’ medication usage. Our study was limited by its small sample size and multimodal comparator group exclusion. Conclusions OMT provides an evidence-based management option to reduce pain levels, improve functional status, and decrease medication usage in chronic pain conditions, especially low back pain (LBP). Pain management guidelines should include OMT as a resource to alleviate chronic pain.

scholarly journals Evaluation of an innovative tele-education intervention in chronic pain management for primary care clinicians practicing in underserved areas

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 484-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea D Furlan ◽  
Jane Zhao ◽  
Jennifer Voth ◽  
Samah Hassan ◽  
Ruth Dubin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Healthcare Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Introduction Inadequate knowledge and training of healthcare providers are obstacles to effective chronic pain management. ECHO (extension for community healthcare outcomes) uses case-based learning and videoconferencing to connect specialists with providers in underserved areas. ECHO aims to increase capacity in managing complex cases in areas with poor access to specialists. Methods A pre-post study was conducted to evaluate the impact of ECHO on healthcare providers’ self-efficacy, knowledge and satisfaction. Type of profession, presenting a case, and number of sessions attended were examined as potential factors that may influence the outcomes Results From June 2014 to March 2017, 296 primary care healthcare providers attended ECHO, 264 were eligible for the study, 170 (64%) completed the pre-ECHO questionnaire and 119 completed post-ECHO questionnaires. Participants were physicians (34%), nurse practitioners (21%), pharmacists (13%) and allied health professionals (32%). Participants attended a mean of 15 ± 9.19 sessions. There was a significant increase in self-efficacy ( p < 0.0001) and knowledge ( p < 0.0001). Self-efficacy improvement was significantly higher among physicians, physician assistants and nurse practitioners than the non-prescribers group ( p = 0.03). On average, 96% of participants were satisfied with ECHO. Satisfaction was higher among those who presented cases and attended more sessions. Discussion This study shows that ECHO improved providers’ self-efficacy and knowledge. We evaluated outcomes from a multidisciplinary group of providers practicing in Ontario. This diversity supports the generalisability of our findings. Therefore, we suggest that this project may be used as a template for creating other educational programs on other medical topics.

scholarly journals Adapting to disruption of research during the COVID-19 pandemic while testing nonpharmacological approaches to pain management

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 827-834
Author(s):  
Brian C Coleman ◽  
Jacob Kean ◽  
Cynthia A Brandt ◽  
Peter Peduzzi ◽  
Robert D Kerns
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Research Progress ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
Study Protocols ◽  
Pragmatic Clinical Trials ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has slowed research progress, with particularly disruptive effects on investigations of addressing urgent public health challenges, such as chronic pain. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Department of Defense (DoD) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Pain Management Collaboratory (PMC) supports 11 large-scale, multisite, embedded pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) in military and veteran health systems. The PMC rapidly developed and enacted a plan to address key issues in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The PMC tracked and collaborated in developing plans for addressing COVID-19 impacts across multiple domains and characterized the impact of COVID-19 on PCT operations, including delays in recruitment and revisions of study protocols. A harmonized participant questionnaire will facilitate later meta-analyses and cross-study comparisons of the impact of COVID-19 across all 11 PCTs. The pandemic has affected intervention delivery, outcomes, regulatory and ethics issues, participant recruitment, and study design. The PMC took concrete steps to ensure scientific rigor while encouraging flexibility in the PCTs, while paying close attention to minimizing the burden on research participants, investigators, and clinical care teams. Sudden changes in the delivery of pain management interventions will probably alter treatment effects measured via PMC PCTs. Through the use of harmonized instruments and surveys, we are capturing these changes and plan to monitor the impact on research practices, as well as on health outcomes. Analyses of patient-reported measures over time will inform potential relationships between chronic pain, mental health, and various socioeconomic stressors common among Americans during the COVID-19 pandemic.

scholarly journals The Impact of Pain Invisibility on Patient-Centered Care and Empathetic Attitude in Chronic Pain Management

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie Paul-Savoie ◽  
Patricia Bourgault ◽  
Stéphane Potvin ◽  
Emilie Gosselin ◽  
Sylvie Lafrenaye
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Patient Centered Care ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Chronic Pain Patients ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Pain Patients

Objectives. The use of interdisciplinary patient-centered care (PCC) and empathetic behaviour seems to be a promising avenue to address chronic pain management, but their use in this context seems to be suboptimal. Several patient factors can influence the use of PCC and empathy, but little is known about the impact of pain visibility on these behaviours. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of visible physical signs on caregiver’s patient-centered and empathetic behaviours in chronic pain context. Methods. A convenience sample of 21 nurses and 21 physicians participated in a descriptive study. PCC and empathy were evaluated from self-assessment and observer’s assessment using a video of real patients with chronic pain. Results. The results show that caregivers have demonstrated an intraindividual variability: PCC and empathetic behaviours of the participants were significantly higher for patients who have visible signs of pain (rheumatoid arthritis and complex regional pain syndrome) than for those who have no visible signs (Ehler–Danlos syndrome and fibromyalgia) (p<0.001). Participants who show a greater difference in their patient-centered behaviour according to pain visibility have less clinical experience. Discussion. The pain visibility in chronic pain patients is an important factor contributing to an increased use of PCC and empathy by nurses and physicians, and clinical experience can influence their behaviours. Thus, pain invisibility can be a barrier to quality of care, and these findings reinforce the relevance to educating caregivers to these unconscious biases on their behaviour toward chronic pain patients.

scholarly journals An Innovative Electronic Health Toolkit (Our Whole Lives for Chronic Pain) to Reduce Chronic Pain in Patients With Health Disparities: Open Clinical Trial

10.2196/14768 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e14768
Author(s):  
Paula Gardiner ◽  
Salvatore D'Amico ◽  
Man Luo ◽  
Niina Haas
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Pain Medication ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Management Platform ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
The Impact

Background Chronic pain affects millions of Americans. Our Whole Lives, an electronic health (eHealth) toolkit for Chronic Pain (Our Whole Lives for Chronic Pain [OWLCP]), is a mind-body chronic pain management platform that teaches self-management strategies to reduce pain impact and pain medication use. Objective The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of OWLCP in reducing pain impact and pain-related outcomes. Methods We conducted a pre-post clinical study (2 cohorts) to assess the feasibility of OWLCP usage among low-income patients with chronic pain. Outcome data, collected at baseline and 9 weeks, included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29), pain self-efficacy, and pain medication use. In the statistical analysis, we used descriptive statistics, logistic regression, linear regression, and qualitative methods. Results Among the enrolled 43 participants, the average age was 50 years, (39/43) 91% were female, (16/43) 37% were black, and (7/43) 16% were Hispanic. From baseline to follow-up, the PROMIS measures showed a reduction in depression (P=.02), pain interference (P=.003), and average pain impact score (P=.007). Pain self-efficacy increased ((P<.001), whereas opioid use had a 13% reduction (P=.03). Conclusions The eHealth chronic pain management platform, OWLCP, is a potential tool to reduce the impact of chronic pain for low-income racially diverse populations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document