scholarly journals Pengaruh Bevacizumab Intravitreal terhadap Best Corrected Visual Acuity dan Central Macular Thickness pada Diabetic Macular Edema

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arini Ghaisa Atsari ◽  
Weni Helvinda

Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) adalah penyebab utama kebutaan pada populasi diabetes. Salah satu patogenesis pada DME adalah karena peningkatan ekspresi VEGF. Bevacizumab adalah anti-VEGF yang dapat meningkatkan Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) dan mengurangi Central Macular Thickness (CMT) pada pasien DME. Tujuan: Mengetahui persentase jenis kelamin, usia, durasi DM tipe II, BCVA dan CMT sebelum dan setelah injeksi pada bulan pertama dan bulan ketiga pada pasien DME serta menganalisis pengaruh intravitreal bevacizumab anti-VEGF terhadap BCVA dan CMT pada DME di Rumah Sakit M Djamil Padang. Metode: Penelitian ini adalah studi retrospektif analitik berdasarkan rekam medis dari 16 pasien DME yang telah injeksi bevacizumab intravitreal pada tahun 2017. Data dianalisis secara statistik menggunakan uji one way Anova dengan p < 0,05 dianggap signifikan. Hasil: Pasien terdiri dari 11 wanita (68,8%) dan 5 pria (31,2%). Jumlah usia pasien terbanyak antara 51-55 tahun (43,8%) dan durasi terlama yang diketahui DM tipe II adalah 5-10 tahun (50,0%). Rata-rata BCVA (logMAR) sebelum injeksi intravitreal bevacizumab adalah 0,95, bulan pertama setelah injeksi adalah 0,68, dan bulan ketiga setelah injeksi adalah 0,55. CMT rata-rata sebelum injeksi bevacizumab intravitreal adalah 427,62, bulan pertama setelah injeksi 359,59, dan bulan ketiga setelah injeksi 318,12. Simpulan: Terdapat pengaruh bevacizumab anti-VEGF intravitreal terhadap BCVA dan CMT di DME di Rumah Sakit M Djamil Padang.

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ali Haider ◽  
Uzma Sattar ◽  
Syeda Rushda Zaidi

Purpose: To evaluate the change in visual acuity in relation to decrease in central macular thickness,after a single dose of intravitreal Bevacizumab injection.Study Design: Quasi experimental study.Place and Duration of Study: Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore, from January 2019 to June 2019.Material and Methods: 70 eyes with diabetic macular edema were included in the study. Patients having high refractive errors (spherical equivalent of > ± 7.5D) and visual acuity worse than +1.2 or better than +0.2 on log MAR were excluded. Central macular edema was measured in μm on OCT and visual acuity was documentedusing Log MAR chart. These values were documented before and at 01 month after injection with intravitrealBevacizumab. Wilcoxon Signed rank test was used to evaluate the difference in VA beforeand after the anti-VEGF injection. Difference in visual acuity and macular edema (central) was observed,analyzed and represented in p value. P value was considered statistically significant if it was less than 0.01%.Results: Mean age of patients was 52.61 ± 1.3. Vision improved from 0.90 ± 0.02 to 0.84 ± 0.02 on log MARchart. The change was statistically significant with p value < 0.001. Central macular thickness reduced from 328 ±14 to 283 ± 10.6 μm on OCT after intravitreal anti-VEGF, with significant p value < 0.001.Conclusion: A 45 μm reduction in central macular thickness was associated with 0.1 Log MAR unit improvementin visual acuity after intravitreal Bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema.


2016 ◽  
Vol 236 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshito Koyanagi ◽  
Shigeo Yoshida ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kobayashi ◽  
Yuki Kubo ◽  
Muneo Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for diabetic macular edema (DME) between eyes with and without previous vitrectomy. Procedures: We prospectively assessed the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) after IVR for 6 months. Results: There were no significant differences in the baseline BCVA and CMT between both groups. In the nonvitrectomized group (n = 15), the mean changes of BCVA and CMT from baseline to month 6 were significant (p < 0.01). In the vitrectomized group (n = 10), the improvement appeared to be slower, and the mean BCVA improvement was not significant (p = 0.5), although the mean CMT decrease was significant (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the mean changes of BCVA and CMT between both groups at 6 months. Conclusions: The difference in the effectiveness of IVR between both groups was not significant. IVR can be a treatment option even for vitrectomized DME eyes.


Author(s):  
Shariza Kanji ◽  
Kazim Dhalla ◽  
William Makupa

Background: Diabetic macular edema is a type of diabetic maculopathy affecting the central vision, ranging from mild blur to blindness. Laser photocoagulation has been the mainstay of treatment for the past three decades but it has a limited role in improving the central vision. Recent introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors appears to be promising in restoring vision. However, due to its short half life multiple injections are required to control edema and maintain vision. Objectives: To determine the visual and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema. Methods: A hospital based retrospective cross-sectional study was done at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center eye department from 2011- 2015. During this time, patients with  diabetic macular edema who were given intravitreal bevacizumab and satisfied the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Visual acuity, central macular thickness and macular volume were recorded at baseline, six, twelve, eighteen, twenty four and thirty weeks respectively. Optical coherence tomography was used to record central macular thickness and macular volume. Univariate and multivariate binary regression analysis were done and the p-value, odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated. Results: The prevalence of Diabetic macular edema was 15.4%. Mean baseline visual acuity improved from  0.9 ± 0.57 log MAR (6/48) to 0.6±0.49 log MAR (6/24) (95% CI 0.207 - 0.389) at 30 weeks. The mean baseline central macular thickness decreased from 426.97 ± 148.358 μm to 280.98 ± 95.89  μm at 30 weeks (95% 151.531 - 187.044, P < .001). The mean baseline macular volume decreased significantly from 10.59 ± 2.55 mm3 to 8.38 ± 1.498 mm3 (95% CI 1.860 - 2.886) at 30 weeks. In multivariate analysis, patients with no hypertension were more likely to have a better visual outcome of 6/18 or better (95% CI 1.064 - 4.420, P < .033). Conclusion: This study shows a high burden of diabetic macular edema in our setting. Intravitreal bevacizumab injection results in better visual and anatomical outcomes.


Author(s):  
K. A. Ahmed ◽  
◽  
T.N. Semenova ◽  
I.B. Soloveichik ◽  
D.G. Arsyutov ◽  
...  

Despite the vitrectomy performed for diabetic macular edema (DME), some patients still have symptoms of the disease due to overproduction of VEGF by the ischemic retina, which requires regular administration of an antiangiogenic drug. Studies of the pharmacokinetics of antiangiogenic drugs after vitrectomy in humans have not been carried out. Data from the DRCR.net (Post-Hawk Protocol I) study and real-life clinical practice studies show similar results for anti-VEGF DMO therapy in vitreous eyes and after vitrectomy (2, 7). Purpose. To assess the effectiveness of antiangiogenic therapy with aflibercept for DMO in avitreal eyes in real clinical practice. Methods. The initial and after vitrectomy best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were determined according to OCT data, then these parameters were monitored by 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the start of antiangiogenic therapy with aflibercept. 14 patients (14 eyes) with persistent DME underwent vitrectomy with removal of the internal limiting membrane, in 5 of them the epiretinal fibrosis was removed and 3 of them with a traction retinal detachment that was also removed with air tamponade. Results. Aflibercept intravitreal injections were started with 5 loading doses by 1-11 months after vitrectomy. On average, after 12 months, patients received 7.2 injections, while there was no need for laser surgery of the macular zone. By the end of the study, the CRT decreased by 255 ±86 µm, the BCVA was 0.35 ± 0.2 in comparison with the initial 0.07±0.03 (on a decimal scale). Conclusions. The effectiveness of the anti-VEGF therapy with aflibercept for DME in avitreal eyes was confirmed by an increase in functional (BCVA) and normalization of morphological (CRT on OCT) parameters after the first injections during the period of loading doses. Previous vitrectomies in patients with DMO do not affect the long-term favorable clinical outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy with aflibercept. Key words: vitrectomy, diabetic macular edema, aflibercept, anti-VEGF, OCT, best corrected visual acuity, central retinal thickness.


Author(s):  
Andi Arus Victor ◽  
Masniah Masniah ◽  
Ari Djatikusumo ◽  
Elvioza Elvioza ◽  
Gitalisa Andayani Adriono ◽  
...  

Introduction: Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) is a manifestation of diabetic retinopathy and is the most common cause of vision loss in diabetics. The incidence of DME has a tendency to increase, concomitant with the prevalence of diabetes globally by more than 50% from 2000 to 2030. This study aims to evaluate the proportion of central macular thickness (CMT) improvement and visual acuity in DME patients treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection. Methods: This study is a retrospective descriptive study. The study was conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology at RSUP Cipto Mangunkusumo (RSCM) Jakarta. Data were obtained from the medical records of all diabetic retinopathy patients with macular edema who were treated with IVB at RSCM Kirana Vitreoretina Polyclinic on January – December 2017. Results: Of the 44 subjects, improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) occurred in 24 (54.54%) subjects at the first-month evaluation and 19 (43.18%) subjects at the third-month evaluation. CMT decreased in 37 (84.41%) subjects at the first-month evaluation and 35 (81.81%) subjects at the third-month evaluation. Conclusion: Visual acuity improvement and central macular thickness reduction 3 months after IVB injection. These results strengthen IVB injection to be an alternative to adjuvant therapy in DME.   Keywords: Diabetic Macular Edema, Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 3000-3005
Author(s):  
Khlood M. Aldossary ◽  
Anfal Alruzuq ◽  
Ghady Almohanna ◽  
Hessa Almusallam ◽  
Sara Alamri ◽  
...  

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant cause of diabetic retinopathy and a major cause of vision loss. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two injectable drugs; intravitreal Aflibercept and intravitreal Ranibizumab for the treatment of DME of the eyes. A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients diagnosed with DME from March 2014 to January 2019 who received either intravitreal Aflibercept or intravitreal Ranibizumab injection. A total of 57 eyes were included, of which 19 eyes were treated with intravitreal Ranibizumab injection, and 38 eyes were treated with intravitreal Aflibercept injection; all eyes were examined for 3 months. Two outcomes were assessed in this study, namely; visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT). The mean age in the Ranibizumab group was 61.1±9.5 vs 64.3±10.2 in the Aflibercept group with no significant difference (p-value=0.25). The ratio of improvement in visual acuity (VA) in the Ranibizumab group was 68.4% vs 44.7% in the Aflibercept group; (p-value=0.038) which demonstrates the superiority of Ranibizumab over Aflibercept concerning visual acuity result. However, there is no statistically significant difference between the ratio of improvement in central macular thickness (CMT) results in both groups; (p-value=1.00). In fact, the ratio of improvement in CMT in both groups was the same 78.9% for both the groups. The pre and post results demonstrated improvement in post-procedural for CMT among both the groups but only Ranibizumab group showed VA improvement post-procedural. Through this study, we concluded that both injectable drugs improve visual acuity (VA) and decrease central macular thickness (CMT) in eyes with DME. However, Ranibizumab is superior in improving visual acuity compared to Aflibercept. Further comparative effectiveness trials between Aflibercept and Ranibizumab are still warranted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-422
Author(s):  
Yong Cheng ◽  
◽  
Ming-Wei Zhao ◽  
Tong Qian ◽  
◽  
...  

AIM: To evaluate the two-year outcomes of patients treated for diabetic macular edema (DME) with intravitreal Conbercept (IVC). METHODS: The clinical data of 30 DME patients (36 eyes) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were treated with IVC for 3mo. Additional IVC was given at subsequent monthly visits, if needed (3+PRN). The patients were followed up for 24mo. RESULTS: The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24mo significantly increased (66.7±15.3 letters) in comparison with the baseline (54.4±15.4 letters, P<0.0001). The mean improvement in BCVA was 11.0±2.9 letters. At 24mo, 44.1% of the eyes surveyed gained ≥15 letters, 52.9% of the eyes gained ≥10 letters, and 70.6% of the eyes gained ≥5 letters. No vision loss was noted in 96.8% of the eyes, and 5.9% of the eyes lost ≥5 letters, but ≤10 letters. The central retinal thickness (CRT) at 24mo was significantly reduced (277.1±122.9 μm) in comparison with the baseline (510.9±186.1 μm, P<0.0001). At 24mo, 43.3% of the patients had a CRT ≤250 μm. The mean number of injections over 24mo was 10.6±2.0. No severe eye or systemic adverse events related to either the drug or injection were noted. CONCLUSION: IVC is safe and effective for the treatment of DME.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Ozkaya ◽  
Gokhan Demir ◽  
Asli Kirmaci

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of ranibizumab and aflibercept in the treatment of diabetic macular edema associated with subfoveal retinal detachment. Methods: This is a retrospective, comparative study. The treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema patients who had diabetic macular edema associated with subfoveal retinal detachment and underwent intravitreal aflibercept or intravitreal ranibizumab treatment were included. The patients were treated on a pro re nata treatment regimen after a loading dose of 3-monthly injections and the follow-up time was 12 months. The primary outcome measure of this study was the presence of subfoveal retinal detachment after treatment at different time points. The secondary outcome measures were the change in best corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness. Results: A total of 46 eyes of 46 patients were included. The aflibercept group consisted of 20 and the ranibizumab group consisted of 26 eyes. During the follow-up period of 12 months, subfoveal retinal detachment was completely resolved in 75% versus 57.7% of the eyes at month 3 (p = 0.2), 90% versus 76.9% at month 6 (p = 0.2), 90% versus 65.4% at month 9 (p = 0.05), and 100% versus 80.8% at month 12 (p = 0.03) in the intravitreal aflibercept versus intravitreal ranibizumab groups. The change in best corrected visual acuity was not statistically different between the groups at months 3, 6, 9, and 12, respectively (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusion: Both intravitreal aflibercept and intravitreal ranibizumab were effective in regards to anatomical and functional outcomes of diabetic macular edema patients associated with subfoveal retinal detachment. Interestingly, intravitreal aflibercept seemed more effective than intravitreal ranibizumab in the resolution of subfoveal retinal detachment at month 12.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document