Successful Laparoscopic Treatment of Intrauterine Device and Complication Causing Uterine Rupture

Author(s):  
Özlem Kayacık Günday
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Han You ◽  
Po-Cheng Chen ◽  
Ho-Yen Chueh ◽  
Kuan-Gen Huang ◽  
Hsin-Shih Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polina Schwarzman ◽  
Yael Baumfeld ◽  
Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia ◽  
Shimrit Yaniv-Salem ◽  
Elad Leron ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the pregnancy characteristics and obstetric outcomes in patients after perforation of uterus.Study design: A retrospective, case control study was conducted and included all patients who were diagnosed with uterine perforation and treated in a tertiary referral medical center between the years 1996 to 2018. Up to two deliveries after perforations were investigated.Results: During the study period, 51 women were diagnosed with uterine perforation during gynecological procedures, including intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. The mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis was 27.9 (±4.7) years. The majority, 76.5% (n=39), experienced perforation during IUD insertion, and 23.5% (n=12) of the patients experienced perforation during surgical procedures. Most of the patients were multiparous or grand multiparous, 45.8. % (n=22) and 39.6% (n=19) respectively. Anteflexed uterus found in 86.4% of patients (n=38). Five patients (9.8%) had pelvic abscesses after the IUD insertion. 50 patients had 71 deliveries subsequent the uterine perforation. One patient had intrauterine fetal death due to fetal malformations. One patient had uterine rupture. No other major obstetric complications were noted.Conclusion: Uterine perforation may impair obstetric outcomes; the possibility of uterine rupture must be considered while managing deliveries of patients post uterine perforation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (8) ◽  
pp. 490-490
Author(s):  
Jakub Sliwa ◽  
Tomasz Fuchs ◽  
Anna Kryza-Ottou ◽  
Mariusz Zimmer

1974 ◽  
Vol 77 (3_Suppl) ◽  
pp. S87-S94 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Wiese ◽  
M. Osler

ABSTRACT A retrospective investigation was made of contraception in diabetic women delivered in our department in 1969 and 1970. Seventy-nine (69 per cent) answered the questionnaires. About one third had found the contraceptive instruction insufficient. A shift from conventional to intrauterine contraception and sterilization was seen, but nearly 25% of the patients were still using conventional methods, mainly the condom. The patients consider this an unreliable method. Thirty-three patients were using intrauterine contraception. Although 10 of them had bleeding irregularities, all were satisfied with the method. Sterilization had been performed on 17 patients, all of whom were fully satisfied and had experienced no side effects. Four of 11 insulin-requiring diabetics, who have used combined oestrogen-progesterone medication have had difficulties in the regulation of the diabetes. Of 24 unwanted pregnancies 12 occurred since the hospitalization in 1969 and 1970. In diabetic women the contraceptive method should either be sterilization, intrauterine device or low dose progestagens, and only in a few cases conventional. A thorough contraceptive instruction as well as a close control of the diabetic women are of importance in order to avoid unplanned pregnancy. The best way to achieve this is by having an out-patient clinic in connection with the obstetrical department to supervise contraception in all diabetic women in the area.


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nero Vettoretto ◽  
Michela Caprioli ◽  
Emanuele Botteri

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (67) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Anca Lesnic ◽  
Romina-Marina Sima ◽  
Cristina Moisei ◽  
Cristian Balalau ◽  
Liana Pleș

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document