Turbulent viscous drag reduction with thin-element riblets

AIAA Journal ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Lazos ◽  
S. P. Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuehao Luo ◽  
Xia Xu ◽  
Dong Li ◽  
Wen Song

AbstractWith the rapid development of science and technology, increasing research interests have been focused on environment protection, global warming, and energy shortage. At present, reducing friction force as much as possible has developed into an urgent issue. Sharkskin effect has the potential ability to lower viscous drag on the fluid-solid interface in turbulence, and therefore, how to fabricate bio-inspired sharkskin surfaces is progressively becoming the hot topic. In this review, various methods of fabricating drag reduction surfaces covering biological sharkskin morphology are illustrated and discussed systematically, mainly involving direct bio-replicated, synthetic fabricating, bio/micro-rolling, enlarged solvent-swelling, drag reduction additive low-releasing, trans-scale enlarged three-dimensional fabricating, flexible printing, large-proportional shrunken bio-replicating, ultraviolet (UV) curable painting, and stretching deformed methods. The overview has the potential benefits in better acquainting with the recent research status of fabricating sharkskin surfaces covering the biological morphology.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine K. Disser ◽  
Thomas C. Corke ◽  
Flint O. Thomas ◽  
Alan Duong ◽  
Samaresh Midya

Author(s):  
Yasmin Khakpour ◽  
Miad Yazdani

Supercavitation is known as the way of viscous drag reduction for the projectiles, moving in the liquid phase. In recent works, there is distinct investigation between cavitation flow and momentum transfer far away from the cavity surface. However, it seems that there is strong connection between overall flow and what takes place in the sheet cavity where a constant pressure distribution is assumed. Furthermore as we’ll see, pressure distribution on cavity surface caused due to overall conditions, induct nonaxisymetric forces and they may need to be investigated. Primarily we describe how pressure distribution into the cavity can cause separation of the aero boundary layer. Then we present some approaches by which this probable separation can be controlled. Comparisons of several conditions exhibits that at very low cavitation numbers, constant pressure assumption fails particularly for gradient shaped profiles and separation is probable if the flow is sufficiently turbulent. Air injection into the NATURALLY FORMED supercavity is found as an effective way to delay probable separation and so significant pressure drag reduction is achieved. In addition, the position of injection plays a major role to control the aero boundary layer and it has to be considered. Moreover, electromagnetic forces cause to delay or even prevent separation in high pressure gradient flows and interesting results obtained in this regard shows significant drag reduction in supercavitating vehicles.


Author(s):  
Scott Rowan ◽  
Masahiro Takahashi ◽  
Tetsuji Sunami ◽  
Katsuhiro Itoh ◽  
Tomoyuki Komuro ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yasmin Khakpour ◽  
Miad Yazdani

Supercavitation is known as the way of viscous drag reduction for the projectiles, moving in the liquid phase. In recent works, there is distinct investigation between cavitation flow and momentum transfer far away from the cavity surface. In fact such methodologies consider cavitation flow statically, rather than taking dynamic effects of overall flow into account. However, it seems that there is strong connection between overall flow and what takes place in the sheet cavity where a constant pressure distribution is assumed. Thereby, in order to configure the system conditions which may be cause of cavity perturbation and so system oscillation, we need to use proper methodologies in which turbulence shear stress effects and role of their distribution, are suitably come into account. Numerical simulation of supercavitating flows is pursued in this paper. The effect of air injection in the cavity as a means of stabilization is examined. A k-epsilon model is employed for the liquid flow region while a single-fluid two phase model is applied in the cavity region. Comparisons of several conditions exhibits that at very low cavitation numbers, constant pressure assumption fails particularly for gradient shaped profiles and separation is probable if the flow is sufficiently turbulent. Air injection into the NATURALLY FORMED supercavity is found as an effective way to prevent the probable separation and so significant pressure drag reduction up to 70% is observed. In addition, the position of injection plays a major role to control the aero boundary layer and it has to be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document