Commercial Collaboration for Collision Avoidance and Flight Operations

Author(s):  
David Finkleman
Author(s):  
Julie C. Prinet ◽  
Yuzhi Wan ◽  
Nadine Sarter

Future aviation operations will require pilots to assume new tasks, such as self-separation. Tactile displays are a promising means of supporting this task. They are well suited for presenting spatial information and offload the heavily taxed visual and auditory channels. This experiment assessed the effectiveness of tactile spatial alerts for notifying pilots of an aircraft intruding on their flight path during Closely Spaced Parallel Approaches. Two alerting strategies (single-stage vs. graded) and two alert types (status vs. command) were compared. 19 pilots had to fly a series of approaches, detect tactile alerts and perform evasive maneuvers. The detection rate for tactile alerts was 100%. Graded and status alerts led to the highest response accuracy (100% and 98%, respectively). Response times were faster for command alerts and during manual flight. These results indicate that tactile displays are effective for conveying spatial information and can help prevent collisions in future aviation operations.


1989 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel Havel ◽  
Jaroslav Husarčík

The objective of ground collision avoidance systems (GCAS) is to assure the separation of aircraft during flight operations, GCAS can be divided into tactical and strategic systems. The term tactical implies conflict prediction made after every radar scan and with approximately a one minute look ahead time. The aim of the study is to build up a mathematical model which uses only radar information and predicts potential conflicts within a fixed time, p, which may differ in different areas.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. de Boer ◽  
Karel Hurts

Abstract. Automation surprise (AS) has often been associated with aviation safety incidents. Although numerous laboratory studies have been conducted, few data are available from routine flight operations. A survey among a representative sample of 200 Dutch airline pilots was used to determine the prevalence of AS and the severity of its consequences, and to test some of the factors leading to AS. Results show that AS is a relatively widespread phenomenon that occurs three times per year per pilot on average but rarely has serious consequences. In less than 10% of the AS cases that were reviewed, an undesired aircraft state was induced. Reportable occurrences are estimated to occur only once every 1–3 years per pilot. Factors leading to a higher prevalence of AS include less flying experience, increasing complexity of the flight control mode, and flight duty periods of over 8 hr. It is concluded that AS is a manifestation of system and interface complexity rather than cognitive errors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document