Emerging Space Powers - A Comparative Study of National Policy and Economic Analysis for Asian Space Programs (Japan, China, and India)

Space 2006 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venkatesan Sundararajan
1975 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia L. Thrupp

For anyone on the green side of fifty who didn't start historical browsing in the playpen it may be quite hard to see the present appeal of statistical theory and method in perspective. To one lucky enough to have been a student abroad in the 1920's, it is merely one of the consequences of a fundamental shift, which was firming in that decade, in conceptions of the economic historian's job. Essentially the shift consisted in making the economy and the social institutions in which it is embedded analytically distinct. Voices from the Polanyite school still claim that this step was as wrong as Adam's eating of the apple. Milder critics complain only that some of us let economic analysis run away with the ball to the neglect of social analysis and of the interplay between the two. For workers on the recent past this is defensible, because the heavy fall-out of purely economic data clamors to be dealt with in its own terms. The preindustrialist, who has to dig harder for data, and seldom turns up such pure economic ore, is more inclined to think in terms of interplay.


2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashmi U. Arora ◽  
Quanda Zhang

Energy ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 272-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujala Bhattarai ◽  
Gopi Krishna Kafle ◽  
Seung-Hee Euh ◽  
Jae-Heun Oh ◽  
Dae Hyun Kim

2016 ◽  
pp. 99-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ram S. Jakhu ◽  
Joseph N. Pelton ◽  
Yaw Otu Mankata Nyampong

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (supp01) ◽  
pp. 95-115
Author(s):  
TONGJIN ZHANG ◽  
YUAN ZHANG ◽  
GUANGHUA WAN ◽  
HAITAO WU

This paper attempts to explain why China performed better than India in reducing poverty. As two of the most populous countries in the world, China and India have both experienced fast economic growth and high inequality in the past four decades. Conversely, China adopted a more export-oriented development strategy, resulting in faster industrialization or urbanization and deeper globalization, than India. Consequently, to conduct the comparative study, we first decompose poverty changes into a growth and an inequality components, assessing the relative importance of growth versus distributional changes on poverty in China and India. Then, Chinese data are used to estimate the impacts of industrialization, urbanization and globalization on poverty reduction in rural China. The major conclusion of this comparative study is that developing countries must prioritize employment generation in secondary and tertiary industries through industrialization and globalization in order to absorb surplus agricultural labor, helping reduce poverty in the rural areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document