Salt is one of the most effective agents for trapping oil and gas. As a ductile material it can move and deform surrounding sediments and create traps. However, effective sealing of reservoirs for movement of hydrocarbons along breaching faults or fracture swarms (i.e. macroseepage) is a completely different mechanism than the molecular movement of hydrocarbons through grain boundaries and microfractures as found in microseepage. Forum Exploration chose to evaluate the applicability of passive surface geochemistry for mapping hydrocarbons in their onshore West Gebel El Zeit lease due to difficulties in seismic imaging through salt and anhydrites sequences. Two economic producing wells had been drilled in the lease, but due to compartmentalization and complexity in the area, three dry wells had also been drilled. Target formations included the Kareem Formation at ∼2,700 m and the Rudeis Formation at ∼3,000 m.The geochemical survey encompassed 100 passive geochemical modules. Passive samplers were also deployed around two producing wells and one dry well. Calibration data generated positive thermogenic signatures around the two producing wells in contrast to the background or baseline signature developed around the dry well. The Rudeis Formation calibration signature ranged from ∼nC5 - ∼nC9 while the Kareem Formation calibration signature ranged from ∼nC6 nC12. This suggested the Rudeis calibration signature was lighter than the Kareem. This correlated with independent API gravity testing on produced oil samples (41o API gravity oil for the Rudeis, 35o API gravity oil for the Kareem).A post-survey well, Fh85-8, was drilled based on combined geochemical and seismic data results. The well was an oil discovery, with initial production of 800 BOPD. The evidence presented in this Gulf of Suez example shows that microseepage can occur through salt sequences. As such, ultrasensitive passive surface geochemical surveys provide a powerful tool for derisking salt plays.