Plant Performance Monitoring: Improving Surveillance of Rotating Equipment on a Gas Processing Plant

Author(s):  
Jean-Gregoire Boero-Rollo ◽  
Bernard Galtie ◽  
Pierre-henry Tincelin ◽  
Nicolas Kessler ◽  
Xavier Lacoux
Author(s):  
J.-G. Boero-Rollo ◽  
B. Galtié ◽  
P.-H. Tincelin ◽  
N. Kessler ◽  
X. Lacoux

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Gregoire Boero-Rollo ◽  
Bernard Galtie ◽  
Pierre-henry Tincelin ◽  
Nicolas Kessler ◽  
Xavier Lacoux

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamarul A. Amminudin ◽  
Mohammed T. AbdulMohsin ◽  
Mohammad F. Muaibed

Author(s):  
F L Carvalho ◽  
F H D Conradie ◽  
H Kuerten ◽  
F J McDyer

The paper examines the variability of key parameters in the operation of ten thermal power plants in various commercial grid environments with a view to assessing the viability of ‘on-demand’ plant performance monitoring for heat rate declaration. The plants of various types are limited to coal- and oil-fired units in the capacity range of 305–690 MW generated output. The paper illustrates the influence of control system configuration on effective and flexible power plant management. The analysis of variability indicates that there is a reasonable probability of achieving adequately stable operating periods within the normal operating envelope of grid dispatch instructions when thermal performance monitoring and display can be undertaken with a high confidence level. The levels of variability in fuel quality, which were measured during nominally constant levels of fuel input and generated output, range from about +1 per cent for oil-fired plants to about ±5 per cent for coal-fired power plants. The implications of adopting on-line monitoring of unit heat rate as an input to the generation ordering and unit commitment process are potentially significant cost and energy conservation benefits for utilities having a high proportion of coal- and oil-fired generation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 58-65
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Shebeko ◽  
Yu. N. Shebeko ◽  
A. V. Zuban

Introduction. GOST R 12.3.047-2012 standard offers a methodology for determination of required fire resistance limits of engineering structures. This methodology is based on a comparison of values of the fire resistance limit and the equivalent fire duration. However, in practice incidents occur when, in absence of regulatory fire resistance requirements, a facility owner, who has relaxed the fire resistance requirements prescribed by GOST R 12.3.047–2012, is ready to accept its potential loss in fire for economic reasons. In this case, one can apply the probability of safe evacuation and rescue to compare distributions of fire resistance limits, on the one hand, and evacuation and rescue time, on the other hand.A methodology for the identification of required fire resistance limits. The probabilistic method for the identification of required fire resistance limits, published in work [1], was tested in this study. This method differs from the one specified in GOST R 12.3.047-2012. The method is based on a comparison of distributions of such random values, as the estimated time of evacuation or rescue in case of fire at a production facility and fire resistance limits for engineering structures.Calculations of required fire resistance limits. This article presents a case of application of the proposed method to the rescue of people using the results of full-scale experiments, involving a real pipe rack at a gas processing plant [2].Conclusions. The required fire resistance limits for pipe rack structures of a gas processing plant were identified. The calculations took account of the time needed to evacuate and rescue the personnel, as well as the pre-set reliability of structures, given that the personnel evacuation and rescue time in case of fire is identified in an experiment.


1975 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 390-404
Author(s):  
William L. McCarthy ◽  
Richard P. Wallace

The Vibration Analysis and Deviation Concept (VIDEC), a computerized steam propulsion plant performance monitoring and failure prediction system, is presently operating on a new containership. This interim report is an attempt to document the history of this system from the concept development phase through fabrication, software design, in-plant simulation, shipyard installation, and initial shipboard operation. A brief system description including system concepts is presented. The paper concentrates on the system implementation, installation, and initial operation. A discussion is presented of types of data and concepts being evaluated and the methods of evaluation being used. Illustrations and tables of pertinent data are also included. The paper closes with a discussion of the VIDEC system and concept as they relate to other possible shipboard automation systems and programs. Finally, conclusions and recommendations are presented.


2020 ◽  
pp. 41-51
Author(s):  
Pavel Kurochkin

Pavel Kurochkin, manager of labor protection, industrial safety and ecology at NIPIGAS company, talks about the realization of the NIPIGAS project for the construction of the Amur gas processing plant for LLC Gazprom pererabotka Blagoveshchensk and about the design and implementation of preparatory works for the construction of the Amur gas-chemical plant for LLC SIBUR. New approaches to labor protection and safety, which are used at NIPIGAZ construction sites, make it possible to control the safety of work at heights and in inaccessible places and to monitor construction and installation works using video surveillance technologies and video analytics.


Author(s):  
Saeid Mokhatab ◽  
William A. Poe ◽  
John Y. Mak

1982 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-190
Author(s):  
P. S. Koelle

Loop testing of safety devices during operation improves plant performance, reduces downtime of process-dependent rotating equipment, and enhances training of personnel. Designers, manufacturers, staff engineers, and plant personnel are always concerned with improving the efficiency and reliability of process equipment. An unscheduled shutdown caused by breakdowns or accidents involving machinery may result in millions of dollars in unrecoverable losses, because the capacity of rotating equipment has increased to a point where temporary replacements to enable the plants to continue their production are hard, or even impossible, to find. The paper will discuss how accidents may be prevented and outline a systematic approach to checking alarm and trip circuits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document