scholarly journals Therapeutic effectiveness of AdvanSync2 at different stages of skeletal maturity in skeletal Class II malocclusion: A single-blind clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 111-119
Author(s):  
Pradeep Raghav ◽  
Shivani Mathur ◽  
Kumar Amit ◽  
Stuti Mohan
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Maturity ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Functional Therapy ◽  
Lower Incisor ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objectives: AdvanSync2 (Ormco, Glendora, California, USA) is a molar-to-molar fixed Class II corrector, based on the philosophy of Herbst which allows the bonding of the both upper and lower arches simultaneously along with fixed functional therapy. The purpose of this study was to cephalometrically compare the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of AdvanSync2 in the correction of Class II malocclusions in circumpubertal and post-pubertal patients. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight samples were selected and divided into two groups based on their CVMI staging, Group A, i.e., at CVMI Stages 2 and 3 (18 girls and six boys) and Group B, i.e., CVMI Stages 4, 5, and 6 (19 girls and five boys). Cephalograms taken at pre- and post-AdvanSync2 stages were compared and analyzed. Results: The results showed that there was a significant increase in mandibular length in both groups. Both the groups also showed sagittal maxillary restriction, maxillary molar distalization, and retroclination of maxillary incisors. On comparison between Group A and Group B, there was no statistically significant differences in terms of maxillary position, size of maxilla, as well as upper and lower incisor inclinations in Group A except for improvement of mandibular position (SNB; P ≤ 0.01) and greater amount of chin growth (B -Pg; P ≤ 0.01) with respect to Group B. Conclusion: AdvanSync2 can be used as an effective fixed functional appliance in post-pubertal group for sagittal mandibular correction in skeletal Class II patients.

scholarly journals Treatment of a skeletal Class II malocclusion using fixed functional appliance with miniplate anchorage

2014 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 276-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mevlut Celikoglu ◽  
Tuba Unal ◽  
Mehmet Bayram ◽  
Celal Candirli
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Present Case Report ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Mandibular Retrusion ◽  
Leveling And Alignment

ABSTRACTBased on our literature search, we found that the use of miniplate anchorage with Forsus fatigue-resistance device (FRD) has not yet been reported. Therefore, the aim of the present case report was to present the treatment of a patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion using Forsus FRD with miniplate anchorage. Fixed appliances with 0.022-inch slots were attached to the maxillary teeth and after 8 months of the leveling and alignment of the upper arch, 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel archwire was inserted and cinched back. Two weeks after the placement of the miniplates bilaterally at the symphysis of the mandible, Forsus FRD was adjusted to the miniplates with a 35-mm length of rod chosen. Nine months after the skeletal anchored Forsus worn, Class I canine and molar relations were achieved and overjet was eliminated.

scholarly journals Management of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Non-Complaint Patient using Powerscope - A Case Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-81
Author(s):  
Akram Ansari ◽  
Abhay Kumar Jain ◽  
Ankit Singh ◽  
Priya Sharma ◽  
Muneeb Adil
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Adolescent Male ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii

Class II malocclusion in pubertal phase presents a major and a common challenge to orthodontists. Proper diagnosis and treatment planning in early stage help in preventing and intercepting the severity of malocclusion. In pubertal phase skeletal Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion are best treated with functional appliance. In recent time PowerScope fixed functional appliance is gaining immense popularity as noncompliant Class II corrector. In the present case report an adolescent male patient having Class II division 1 malocclusion with functional jaw retrusion was treated using MBT 0.022” prescription and PowerScope appliance. 7-8 months of PowerScope wear obtained stable and successful results with improvement in facial profile, skeletal jaw relationship and mild increase in IMPA. It can thus be concluded that PowerScope gives good results in Class II correction with a combination of patient comfort and ease of use that was unmatched among other appliances

scholarly journals Indian Board of Orthodontics Case Report: Management of Skeletal Class II Division 1 Malocclusion With Single-Phase Fixed Orthodontic Treatment Along With Forsus FRD Fixed Functional Appliance

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-208
Author(s):  
Ashish Garg
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Single Phase ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

This case report was submitted to the board under category II for the Indian Board of Orthodontics examination in November 2017. This case report illustrated the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion by pre-adjusted appliance along with Forsus Fatigue Resistance Device (FRD) fixed functional appliance (single-phase treatment) in a 13.6 year-old female patient whose growth was about to cease. The summary of the treatment, various records, treatment progress, and critical appraisal are reprinted here with minimal editing and reformatting, and hence, the presentation resembles the actual documents submitted to the board.

scholarly journals Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using Miniplate Anchorage with Fixed Functional Appliance

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-68
Author(s):  
Suresh Gorantla ◽  
Madhurima Thokala ◽  
Darsana Maru ◽  
Prabhakar Veginadu ◽  
Sudha Sravani Konathala
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii

scholarly journals Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using Miniplate Anchorage with Fixed Functional Appliance

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-68
Author(s):  
Suresh Gorantla ◽  
Madhurima Thokala ◽  
Darsana Maru ◽  
Prabhakar Veginadu ◽  
Sudha Sravani Konathala
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii

Development of a New Fixed Functional Appliance for Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion

2002 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 384-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gero Kinzinger ◽  
Jens Ostheimer ◽  
Frank Förster ◽  
Paul B. Kwandt ◽  
Helmut Reul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii

scholarly journals Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Paola Di Giacomo ◽  
Valeria Ferrara ◽  
Ettore Accivile ◽  
Giacomo Ferrato ◽  
Antonella Polimeni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Hyoid Bone ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Aim. To assess changes in the craniocervical structure and in hyoid bone position in skeletal Class II subjects with and without temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Materials and Methods. The cephalometric analysis of 59 subjects with skeletal Class II was evaluated and compared. The measurements considered were ANB as a parameter of Class II and C0-C1 distance, C1-C2 distance, craniocervical angle, and hyoid bone position for the cervical spine analysis. Patients were divided into patients with TMD (group A) and patients without TMD (group B). TMD were evaluated with Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation analysis, with p value <0,005, were performed. Results. C0-C1 and C1-C2 distance values and hyoid bone position resulted within the normal range in the majority of patients examined. Craniocervical angle was altered in 33 patients. The reduction of this angle with the increase of the ANB value resulted to be statistically significant in group A, according to Pearson’s correlation index. No other data were statistically significant. Conclusions. The significant relationship between skeletal Class II and cervical spine cannot be highlighted. The alteration of craniocervical angle seems to be mildly present, with backward counterclockwise rotation of the head upon the neck in the sample (groups A and B). The presence of TMD as a key factor of changes in neck posture could explain the different result between the two groups about the relationship between ANB and craniocervical angle. This result should be further analyzed in order to better understand if cervical spine changes could be related to mandibular postural ones in the craniocervical space or to temporomandibular joint retropositioning, more recognizable in Class II with TMD, which could determine functional changes in other structures of this unit; neck posture could be the result of a compensatory/antalgic mechanism in response to TMD.

scholarly journals “Effective” TMJ and Chin Position Changes in Class II Treatment

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 813-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Serbesis-Tsarudis ◽  
Hans Pancherz
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Class Ii Treatment ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Edge Group ◽  
Multibracket Appliance ◽  
Class Ii Elastics

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the “effective” temporomandibular joint (TMJ) changes (the sum of condylar modeling, glenoid fossa modeling, and condylar position changes within the fossa), and their influence on chin position in patients with a Class II division 1 malocclusion treated orthodontically with a multibracket appliance and Class II elastics (Tip-Edge) and orthopedically with a fixed functional appliance (Herbst). Materials and Methods: Two groups of successfully treated subjects were evaluated: Tip-Edge (n = 24) and Herbst (n = 40). The Bolton Standards served as a control group. Lateral head films obtained before treatment and after an observation period of 2.6 years (Herbst also after 0.6-year period) were analyzed. Results: In comparison with the Herbst and control groups, the Tip-Edge group exhibited less favorable sagittal “effective” TMJ growth and chin position changes necessary for skeletal Class II correction. Conclusions: Orthodontic therapy with a multibracket appliance and Class II elastics seems not to have any favorable sagittal orthopedic effect on the mandible, while bite jumping with the Herbst appliance has a favorable sagittal orthopedic effect on a short-time basis.

scholarly journals Management of Skeletal Class II in a Growing Patient Using a Headgear and a Fixed Functional Appliance, with a Three-Year Follow-up : An Indian Board of Orthodontics Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-91
Author(s):  
Shahistha Parveen ◽  
Rohan Mascarenhas
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Curve Of Spee ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Skeletal Pattern ◽  
Treatment Objective

This case was submitted to the Indian Board of Orthodontics under category II for phase III examination, in December 2018. SP, a 13-year-old female patient, presented with the chief complaint of forwardly placed upper front teeth. On clinical examination, she was found to have class II division 1 malocclusion with an increased overjet and overbite, a class II skeletal pattern due to a prognathic maxilla and a retrognathic mandible with positive visual treatment objective (VTO), moderate crowding in the upper and lower arches, retained deciduous 54 and 55, an exaggerated Curve of Spee, and a midline discrepancy of 6 mm. The treatment objectives were to correct the skeletal pattern and molar and canine relation. The patient was treated with fixed mechanotherapy, along with a headgear and a fixed functional appliance (Forsus). At the end of the treatment, she showed improvement in the skeletal pattern, good posterior occlusion, and an improved overjet and overbite. A bonded fixed retainer in the lower arch and a Begg’s wraparound retainer in the upper arch were used. Occlusion remained stable 3 years after the treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document