An Unusual Cause of Ankle Pain in a Pediatric Patient – Isolated Transient Bone Marrow Edema of the Talus - Case Report and Review of Literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 111-113
Author(s):  
Vijay Satyanarayana ◽  
Aamer Iqbal ◽  
Aditya Sharma ◽  
Rajesh Botchu

Transient osteoporosis of the talus is an uncommon condition of unknown etiology that is characterized clinically by ankle pain without a history of trauma. We present a case of isolated transient bone marrow edema of the talus in a pediatric patient which is the youngest described in the literature.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1806.1-1807
Author(s):  
S. Giryes ◽  
K. Dolnikov ◽  
A. Balbir-Gurman ◽  
D. Militianu ◽  
N. Puchkov ◽  
...  

Background:Transient osteoporosis (TOP) or transient bone marrow edema syndrome is an enigmatic condition of unknown etiology first described in pregnant women. Though usually self limited, TOP causes pain and debilitation and predisposes the patient to avascular necrosis or fractures. The course can be protracted and patient may suffer relapses. Diagnostic method of choice is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Based on small case series and expert opinion, several therapeutic approaches have been proposed to hasten the recovery, including bisphosphonates, calcitonin, teriparatide. However, the literature is scarce and additional experience is needed to promote the understanding of this condition.Objectives:To present our experience with TOP, including patient’s characteristic, approach to diagnosis, prognosis and therapyMethods:It is retrospective, single center study, conducted in Rambam healthcare campus, Haifa, Israel. All the medical files of patients referred to Rheumatology unit between years 2010-2020 were screened for diagnosis of TOP. Search words included: “osteoporosis”, “bone marrow edema”, “transient osteoporosis”. The files were reviewed for patient’s characteristics, modality of diagnosis, duration until full recovery, treatments and relapses.Results:Eight patients with at least one episode of TOP were identified using the search words. Six patients (75%) were female. Three female patients developed TOP during or shortly after pregnancy. Two patients – one male and one non pregnant female suffered from TOP after bariatric surgery. One pregnant woman had a strong family history of TOP. The most frequent involved site in order of frequency were: hip (4/8), ankle (3/8) and knee (2/8). Six patients presented with more than one simultaneous site of TOP (hips, knees and ankles). Blood count, liver and Kidney function tests, markers of bone resorption, rheumatoid factor, Anti cyclic citrullinated peptide, Antinuclear antibodies were negative in all of the patients. C-reactive protein was elevated in 4/8 patients, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was elevated in 2/8 patients. All patients had vitamin D deficiency. The diagnosis was confirmed by MRI. All the patients were treated with vitamin D and intra-venous Pamidronate, one patient with addition of calcitonin and one patient with addition of intra venous Iloprost. Time to recovery ranged from 1.2 to 6 months. The time to recovery was the same in pregnancy related TOP. Recovery was confirmed with follow-up MRI in all the patients. Relapses occurred in 4/8 patients and only one them had pregnancy related TOP. All the patients were treated by multidisciplinary team, including orthopedic surgeon, physiotherapist and psychologist when needed.Conclusion:Our experience with TOP was enriched in patients presenting with more than one site of disease probably representing referral bias. Pregnancy related TOP was associated with lower risk of relapse. In terms of time to recovery there was no trend between pregnancy related and non related TOP or one site versus several sited TOP. None of the patients developed fracture, advocating in favor of adding bisphosphonates to therapy. Multidisciplinary approach is an essential part of TOP treatment strategy.Disclosure of Interests:Sami Giryes: None declared, Katya Dolnikov: None declared, Alexandra Balbir-Gurman Consultant of: Novartis, Daniela Militianu: None declared, Natalia Puchkov: None declared, Yolanda Braun-Moscovici: None declared


2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1061-1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanasios N. Ververidis ◽  
G. I. Drosos ◽  
K. J. Kazakos ◽  
K. C. Xarchas ◽  
D. A. Verettas

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharat Agarwal

Dear Editor, At the outset, I would like to congratulate the authors of the article published in your journal in the current issue entitled- Idiopathic Transient Osteoporosis during Pregnancy – Report of a Clinical Case JOCR November – December 2019 Volume 9 Issue 6 Page 54-57. However, I regret to mention that the workup mentioned in this article needs to be improved, before one can come to definitive diagnosis of Idiopathic Transient Osteoporosis during Pregnancy. I would like to highlight various perspectives, issues & concerns, the knowledge of which are must for the readers of this journal pertaining to this disorder. It is pertinent to mention no doubt the increasing utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has allowed physicians to investigate edematous changes in bone marrow, a clinically important entity which was previously undetected on conventional radiographs. The first use of the term “bone marrow edema” was by Wilson et al in 1988, and the term “bone marrow edema syndrome” was described in 1993 after the investigation of histological specimens [1]. Later on, importantly Hayes et al. advocated that the term “transient bone marrow edema syndrome” should be used for patients in whom the bone marrow edema pattern was not accompanied by radiographic evidence of osteopenia [2]. And thus separating the two entities i.e. “the transient bone marrow edema syndrome” and “Transient Osteoporosis” Occurrence of hip pain during pregnancy is quite common, although transient osteoporosis as a condition causing this symptom is uncommonly seen. Clinicians should also be aware of intra-articular disorders such as loose bodies, and labral tears; peri-articular pathology such as tendinitis and bursitis; or extra-articular conditions such as referred pain from the lumbar spine, the sacroiliac joint, and or from nerve entrapment syndromes. So, a detailed history and physical examination is helpful to narrow the differential diagnoses, which, in turn, dictate the modal


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A227-A228
Author(s):  
Caroline A Poku ◽  
Pauline M Camacho ◽  
Zubair Ilyas

Abstract Background: Transient osteoporosis is an uncommon and self-limited clinical syndrome characterized by acute joint pain with evidence of bone marrow edema on MRI. It predominantly affects healthy middle-aged men or women in the third trimester of pregnancy. The hips, knee, foot and ankle are affected in decreasing order of frequency. Pathophysiology is unknown but multiple etiologies such as ischemia, neurogenic compression or impaired venous return have been proposed. Classically, it is unilateral and bilateral in only 20%-40% of cases. It has been reported to periodically involve different joints over time with one report showing the progression to regional migratory osteoporosis in at least 20% of patients. There are no specific biomarkers to aid with diagnosis, MRI shows diffuse bone marrow edema sometimes associated with joint effusion with infrequent subchondral microfractures. Other etiologies to consider for bone marrow edema include osteomyelitis, avascular necrosis, trauma, tumors and inflammatory arthropathy. Transient osteoporosis can be self- limiting however, bisphosphonate use has been associated with shortened recovery time. In our patient given lack of access to his previous records to review and ascertain his previous diagnosis, his diagnosis of record was transient osteoporosis rather than regional migratory osteoporosis. Clinical Case: A 47 yo male presented to clinic with complaint of left ankle pain. Pain initially noted when he tripped and fell one year ago. Initial x-rays did not reveal any fractures. He was unable to weight bear due to pain although he had full range of motion at the ankle with a normal neurological and vascular exam of the foot. Due to persistence of pain, an MRI was done which showed cutaneous edema around the medial and lateral aspects of the ankle, trace tibiotalar joint effusion, marrow edema in the distal tibia and navicular with no acute fracture or definite evidence of avascular necrosis. On further questioning he reported a previous history of hip pain at age 32 and 41 with no preceding trauma. X-rays were negative for fracture and MRI showed marrow edema. Symptoms resolved after a few weeks with possible treatment with Alendronate. With the current presentation biochemical work up including Vitamin D, PTH, 24-hour urine calcium, electrolytes, phosphorus and alkaline phosphatase was unremarkable. Given the marrow edema reported on MRI, absence of fracture, osteochondral lesion or recent trauma transient osteoporosis was diagnosed. Given the duration of symptoms he was treated with Reclast 5mg IV once and reported 80% improvement in ankle pain during follow up 4 weeks later. Conclusion: It is important to identify transient osteoporosis and regional migratory osteoporosis to prevent unnecessary medical or surgical therapy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 1615-1619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Joshi ◽  
George Hermann ◽  
Manisha Balwani ◽  
William L Simpson

Radiology ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 167 (3) ◽  
pp. 757-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
A J Wilson ◽  
W A Murphy ◽  
D C Hardy ◽  
W G Totty

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document