Fertilization Rates Obtained with Boar Semen Stored for Zero and Twelve Hours

1958 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 598-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick W. Stratman ◽  
H. L. Self ◽  
Vearl R. Smith
1967 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 463-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Kittock ◽  
J. H. Williams ◽  
D. G. Hanway

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iulian IBĂNESCU ◽  
Claus LEIDING ◽  
Heinrich BOLLWEIN

1973 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 179 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Barron ◽  
William F. Harwell

Agronomy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Theocharis Chatzistathis ◽  
Evgenia Papaioannou ◽  
Anastasia Giannakoula ◽  
Ioannis E. Papadakis

One of the most challenging topics for the sustainable agriculture is how to decrease high fertilization rates. A pot experiment, exploring the effects of zeolite (ZEO) and/or vermiculite (VER) as soil amendments, comparing to the soil application of a controlled release fertilizer (CRF), was realized in chestnut plants. Various parameters related to soil fertility, and plant growth, nutrition, and physiology were investigated to gain knowledge towards more sustainable management. After ZEO application and in comparison to CRF, an impressive boost in soil K was achieved. Moreover, soil P and Zn levels were higher in the VER-treated soil, compared to CRF. Leaf K and Ca concentrations were significantly higher in ZEO, compared to the VER treatment; the highest foliar N and Zn concentrations were measured in CRF and VER, respectively. However, significantly lower foliar Mn and Cu were found in VER. The highest root biomass produced in the ZEO treated plants. For most nutrients, their total uptake per plant was higher in CRF and ZEO. Finally, photosynthetic rates were higher in VER (mainly due to non-stomatal factors) and CRF (mainly due to stomatal factors). Our data open a discussion towards the application of ZEO and/or VER as soil amendments in chestnut nurseries and orchards, aiming at partially decreasing fertilization rates and boosting sustainable nutrient management.


Author(s):  
Lough-Stevens Michael ◽  
Caleb Ghione ◽  
Matthew Urness ◽  
Adelaide Hobbs ◽  
Colleen Sweeney ◽  
...  

Abstract Among a wide diversity of sexually reproducing species, male ejaculates coagulate to form what has been termed a copulatory plug. A number of functions have been attributed to copulatory plugs, including, but not limited to, the inhibition of female remating and the promotion of ejaculate movement. Here we demonstrate that copulatory plugs also influence the likelihood of implantation, which occurs roughly four days after copulation in mice. Using a bead transfer method to control for differences in ejaculate retention and fertilization rates, we show that implantation rates significantly drop among females mated to genetically engineered males incapable of forming plugs (because they lack functional TGM4, the main enzyme responsible for its formation). Surprisingly, this result does not correlate with differences in circulating progesterone levels among females, an important hormone involved in implantation. In this paper we discuss three models that connect male-derived copulatory plugs to implantation success, including the hypothesis that plugs contribute to a threshold amount of stimulation required for females to become receptive to implantation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 220 ◽  
pp. 106410
Author(s):  
Helen Jäkel ◽  
Rafael Gianluppi ◽  
Matheus Schardong Lucca ◽  
Ana Paula Mellagi ◽  
Rafael Rosa Ulguim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document