GnRH-FSH and LH Dose-Response Relationships in Anestrous Sheep and Effects of Estradiol-17β and Progesterone Pretreatment

1982 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 384-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Wheaton ◽  
S. E. Recabarren ◽  
Mary A. Mullett
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Loisel ◽  
H. Quesnel ◽  
C. Farmer

Loisel, F., Quesnel, H. and Farmer, C. 2013. Short Communication: Effect of silymarin (Silybum marianum) treatment on prolactin concentrations in cyclic sows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 93: 227–230. An extract (silymarin) from the plant Silybum marianum (milk thistle) was shown to increase circulating concentrations of prolactin in cycling rats. A dose-response study was undertaken to determine if silymarin does have hyperprolactinemic properties in cycling swine. Forty-four weaned sows were allotted to four groups receiving 0, 1, 2 or 4 g d−1 of silymarin over a period of 8 d. Blood samples were obtained on days 1 (first day of treatment starting 24 to 48 h after the onset of the standing estrus), 2, 3, and 9. Prolactin, progesterone, estradiol-17β and leptin concentrations were determined. Silymarin did not increase prolactin concentrations at any of the doses studied, nor did it affect concentrations of the other hormones (P>0.1).


2003 ◽  
Vol 88 (11) ◽  
pp. 5484-5489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes D. Veldhuis ◽  
William S. Evans ◽  
Cyril Y. Bowers

Abstract To test the clinical hypothesis that an estrogen-enriched milieu enhances GHRH action, we administered placebo (Pl) and estradiol-17β (E2) orally for 23 d to six postmenopausal women in a prospectively randomized, double-masked, within-subject crossover design with 6 wk intervening. The GHRH stimulation protocol entailed consecutive iv infusion of l-arginine and a single iv pulse of saline or one of five randomly ordered doses of recombinant human GHRH-1,44-amide (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 μg/kg) in a total of 12 separate morning, fasting sessions. GH secretion was monitored by sampling blood every 10 min for 6 h; chemiluminescence assay of GH concentrations; deconvolution analysis of stimulated GH release; and nonlinear dose-response reconstruction. Supplementation with E2, compared with Pl: 1) increased (mean ± sem) E2 concentrations from 18 ± 3 (Pl) to 164 ± 12 pg/ml (to convert to picomoles per liter, multiply by 3.57) (P < 0.001); 2) decreased IGF-I concentrations from 181 ± 14 to 120 ± 11 μg/liter (P < 0.01); 3) elevated mean GH concentrations from 0.27 ± 0.06 to 0.59 ± 0.08 μg/liter (P = 0.014); 4) potentiated GH secretion stimulated by l-arginine alone by 1.43-fold (P = 0.012); 5) reduced the ED50 of GHRH from 0.27 ± 0.02 to 0.13 ± 0.01 μg/kg (P < 0.01), denoting enhanced GHRH potency; and 6) heightened the maximal slope of the dose-response function from 1.1 ± 0.1 to 1.4 ± 0.05 [(μg/liter) (μg/kg)−1] (P < 0.05), signifying augmented pituitary sensitivity. The foregoing facilitative mechanisms were specific because E2 replacement did alter maximal l-arginine/GHRH-induced GH secretion, indicating unchanged secretagogue efficacy. In conclusion, inasmuch as E2 also attenuates inhibition of GH secretion by infused somatostatin and potentiates stimulation of GH secretion by GH-releasing peptide-2, we postulate that estrogenic steroids drive pulsatile GH production in part via mechanisms that include all three of GHRH, somatostatin, and putatively GH-releasing peptide/ghrelin signaling.


1986 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1208-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. F. Pope ◽  
M. S. Lawyer ◽  
W. R. Butler ◽  
R. H. Foote ◽  
N. L. First

1963 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald H. Hanscom ◽  
Armand Littman ◽  
Jack V. Pinto

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. S47-S47
Author(s):  
N PAYNE ◽  
R GROCOTTMASON ◽  
A IONESCU ◽  
B SJOBERG ◽  
I SANDBLOM ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. B. Hansen ◽  
M. J. Lambert ◽  
E. M. Forman
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document