Frequency, structure, main causes and outcomes of keratitis caused by wearing contact lenses

Author(s):  
О.V. Pyatyshina ◽  
◽  
E.Y. Perova ◽  
V.Y. Kоstiv ◽  
A.G. Tabolova ◽  
...  

Purpose. To study the frequency, structure and outcomes of keratitis caused by wearing contact lenses. Material and methods. A continuous sample of all cases of the incidence of keratitis provoked by an error in wearing contact lenses in adult patients from 2017 to 2019 was carried out. All of them underwent inpatient treatment for this matter in the ophthalmological department of the City Clinical Hospital No. 10 of the Ministry of Health of the Khabarovsk Territory. The provoking factors, etiological structure, the frequency of restoration of visual functions and the outcomes of these keratitis were determined. Results. The total number of cases studied was 51 (52 eyes). Keratitis was provoked by wearing soft contact lenses (SCL) mainly in females (76.5%) aged 20– 30 years. Lenses were selected mainly for moderate myopia (44%). Bacterial etiology of keratitis was detected in 61% of cases, mixed – in 31% of cases, viral – in 8%. The main reason for the development of keratitis is violations in the mode of using SCL (sleep in lenses, prolonged use of SCL with an expired wearing period, violation of the rules for caring for lenses). Conclusion. In the structure of keratitis, provoked by wearing SCL, there were mainly bacterial keratitis (61%). The predominant factors contributing to the formation of keratitis were: sleeping in lenses (51%) and prolonged wearing of lenses exceeding their useful life (24%). The treatment made it possible to completely restore visual functions in 38% of patients. Key words: keratitis, soft contact lenses, myopic refraction.

2021 ◽  
pp. 76-78
Author(s):  
Z.N. Poskrebysheva ◽  
◽  
A.A. Tyurina ◽  
O.A. Zhabina ◽  
S.E. Avetisov ◽  
...  

Accommodation disorders in young people are more common than diagnosed. This review is based on the data of domestic and foreign literature and studies the effect of contact lenses of various designs on accommodation. Particular attention has been given to bifocal soft contact lenses as one of the recognized interventions for treating juvenile progressive myopia and their ability to slow axial elongation. Key words: accommodation, myopia control, bifocal contact lenses, orthokeratology.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 46-50
Author(s):  
N. Pasechnikova ◽  
◽  
G. Drozhzhina ◽  
O. Ivanova ◽  
I. Nasinnik ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.N. Safonova ◽  
◽  
I.A. Novikov ◽  
V.I. Boev ◽  
O.V. Gladkova ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 548-554
Author(s):  
Nir Erdinest ◽  
Naomi London ◽  
Nadav Levinger ◽  
Yair Morad

The goal of this retrospective case series is to demonstrate the effectivity of combination low-dose atropine therapy with peripheral defocus, double concentric circle design with a center distance soft contact lenses at controlling myopia progression over 1 year of treatment. Included in this series are 3 female children aged 8–10 years with progressing myopia averaging −4.37 ± 0.88 D at the beginning of treatment. Their average annual myopic progression during the 3 years prior to therapy was 1.12 ± 0.75 D. They had not attempted any myopia control treatments prior to this therapy. The children were treated with a combination of 0.01% atropine therapy with spherical peripheral defocus daily replacement soft lenses MiSight<sup>®</sup> 1 day (Cooper Vision, Phoenix, AZ, USA). They underwent cycloplegic refraction, and a slit-lamp evaluation every 6 months which confirmed no adverse reactions or staining was present. Each of the 3 children exhibited an average of 0.25 ± 0.25 D of myopia progression at the end of 1 year of treatment. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first published study exhibiting that combining low-dose atropine and peripheral defocus soft contact lenses is effective at controlling children’s moderate to severe myopia progression during 1 year of therapy.


1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Bachman ◽  
Bruce C. Leibrecht ◽  
John K. Crosley ◽  
Dudley R. Price ◽  
Patrick M. Leas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document