CRITICALLY ILL CHILDREN WITH ASTHMA EXACERBATION IN A TERTIARY PAEDIATRIC HOSPITAL: FACTORS RELATED TO REQUIREMENT FOR NON-INVASIVE VENTILATION

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheong Yi Loong Benny
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Asthma Exacerbation ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Paediatric Hospital ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Children With Asthma ◽  
Hospital Factors

Predictive factors of non invasive ventilation failure in critically ill children: a prospective epidemiological study

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Mayordomo-Colunga ◽  
Alberto Medina ◽  
Corsino Rey ◽  
Juan José Díaz ◽  
Andrés Concha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epidemiological Study ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Prospective Epidemiological Study ◽  
Ventilation Failure

scholarly journals Use of non-invasive ventilation to wean critically ill adults off invasive ventilation: meta-analysis and systematic review

BMJ ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 338 (may21 1) ◽  
pp. b1574-b1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E A Burns ◽  
N. K J Adhikari ◽  
S. P Keenan ◽  
M. Meade
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Critically Ill Adults ◽  
Ill Adults

scholarly journals Tailored sedation in critically ill COVID-19 patients based on lung damage, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Deep Sedation ◽  
Lung Damage ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Hemodynamic Stability ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Light Sedation

In critically ill COVID-19 patients, proper management of sedation is an important issue. Therefore, for this purpose, several strategies and protocols have been proposed. In this paper, we illustrate an approach focused on lung damage, and both the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of drugs used. In line with this, during high flow nasal (HFN), continuous positive airway pressure, or non-invasive ventilation, dexmedetomidine-based light sedation can be helpful for maintaining the respiratory driving and improving the patient comfort. A worsening in the respiratory clinical picture with mechanical ventilation may require deep sedation with the use of clonidine. The latter may reduce the hypnotic doses, allowing improved hemodynamic stability. When respiratory performance improves, dexmedetomidine can replace clonidine to reduce the time to extubation.

Respiratory System: Physiology of Mechanical Ventilation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Yerxa ◽  
Cory J Vatsaas ◽  
Suresh Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patient ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Subsequent Chapter ◽  
System Physiology

Airway and ventilatory management are mandatory skills for the critical care surgeon. Identifying and correctly managing a patient’s airway is the first step followed by correcting any oxygenation or ventilation deliver deficits. Mechanical ventilation with positive pressure has multiple physiologic effects that must be completely understood in a complex critically ill patient. Invasive and non-invasive modalities may be used to aid in achieving these goals. Further strategies such as using low tidal volume, adequate PEEP, and rescue strategies are important in patients with ARDS. Weaning from the ventilator as soon as able is an important consideration to improve outcomes,  The subsequent chapter reviews airway management and the physiologic aspects of mechanical ventilation to aid in decision-making when caring for the critically ill patient with deficits in oxygenation or ventilation. This review 5 figures, 2 tables, and 41 references. Key Words: airway management, mechanical ventilation, invasive ventilation, non-invasive ventilation, tracheostomy, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), positive pressure ventilation, oxygenation

Non-invasive ventilation versus invasive weaning in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Thorax ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. thoraxjnl-2021-216993
Author(s):  
Karen E A Burns ◽  
James Stevenson ◽  
Matthew Laird ◽  
Neill K J Adhikari ◽  
Yuchong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Critically Ill Adults ◽  
Ill Adults ◽  
Duration Of Ventilation

BackgroundExtubation to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been investigated as a strategy to wean critically ill adults from invasive ventilation and reduce ventilator-related complications.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, proceedings of four conferences and bibliographies (to June 2020) for randomised and quasi-randomised trials that compared extubation with immediate application of NIV to continued invasive weaning in intubated adults and reported mortality (primary outcome) or other outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened citations, assessed trial quality and abstracted data.ResultsWe identified 28 trials, of moderate-to-good quality, involving 2066 patients, 44.6% with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Non-invasive weaning significantly reduced mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.74; high quality), weaning failures (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.81; high quality), pneumonia (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.41; high quality), intensive care unit (ICU) (mean difference (MD) −4.62 days, 95% CI −5.91 to −3.34) and hospital stay (MD −6.29 days, 95% CI −8.90 to −3.68). Non-invasive weaning also significantly reduced the total duration of ventilation, duration of invasive ventilation and duration of ventilation related to weaning (MD −0.57, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.07) and tracheostomy rate. Mortality, pneumonia, reintubation and ICU stay were significantly lower in trials enrolling COPD (vs mixed) populations.ConclusionNon-invasive weaning significantly reduced mortality, pneumonia and the duration of ventilation related to weaning, particularly in patients with COPD. Beneficial effects are less clear (or more careful patient selection is required) in non-COPD patients.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020201402.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document