In vitro characterization of buprenorphine, samidorphan, and combinations being developed as an adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sokhom Pin ◽  
May Fern Toh
Keyword(s):  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
In Vitro Characterization

scholarly journals Exploring the Role and Potential of Probiotics in the Field of Mental Health: Major Depressive Disorder

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1728
Author(s):  
Dinyadarshini Johnson ◽  
Sivakumar Thurairajasingam ◽  
Vengadesh Letchumanan ◽  
Kok-Gan Chan ◽  
Learn-Han Lee
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Epigenetic Mechanisms ◽  
Preclinical Models ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
Health Domains ◽  
Probiotic Intervention

The field of probiotic has been exponentially expanding over the recent decades with a more therapeutic-centered research. Probiotics mediated microbiota modulation within the microbiota–gut–brain axis (MGBA) have been proven to be beneficial in various health domains through pre-clinical and clinical studies. In the context of mental health, although probiotic research is still in its infancy stage, the promising role and potential of probiotics in various mental disorders demonstrated via in-vivo and in-vitro studies have laid a strong foundation for translating preclinical models to humans. The exploration of the therapeutic role and potential of probiotics in major depressive disorder (MDD) is an extremely noteworthy field of research. The possible etio-pathological mechanisms of depression involving inflammation, neurotransmitters, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and epigenetic mechanisms potentially benefit from probiotic intervention. Probiotics, both as an adjunct to antidepressants or a stand-alone intervention, have a beneficial role and potential in mitigating anti-depressive effects, and confers some advantages compared to conventional treatments of depression using anti-depressants.

scholarly journals Deep phenotyping of attention impairments and the ‘Inattention Biotype’ in Major Depressive Disorder

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (13) ◽  
pp. 2203-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arielle S. Keller ◽  
Tali M. Ball ◽  
Leanne M. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Selective Attention ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Behavioral Measure ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
Attention Impairment ◽  
Attention Impairments

AbstractBackgroundAttention impairment is an under-investigated feature and diagnostic criterion of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) that is associated with poorer outcomes. Despite increasing knowledge regarding mechanisms of attention in healthy adults, we lack a detailed characterization of attention impairments and their neural signatures in MDD.MethodsHere, we focus on selective attention and advance a deep multi-modal characterization of these impairments in MDD, using data acquired from n = 1008 patients and n = 336 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Selective attention impairments were operationalized and anchored in a behavioral performance measure, assessed within a battery of cognitive tests. We sought to establish the accompanying neural signature using independent measures of functional magnetic resonance imaging (15% of the sample) and electroencephalographic recordings of oscillatory neural activity.ResultsGreater impairment on the behavioral measure of selective attention was associated with intrinsic hypo-connectivity of the fronto-parietal attention network. Not only was this relationship specific to the fronto-parietal network unlike other large-scale networks; this hypo-connectivity was also specific to selective attention performance unlike other measures of cognition. Selective attention impairment was also associated with lower posterior alpha (8–13 Hz) power at rest and was related to more severe negative bias (frequent misidentifications of neutral faces as sad and lingering attention on sad faces), relevant to clinical features of negative attributions and brooding. Selective attention impairments were independent of overall depression severity and of worrying or sleep problems.ConclusionsThese results provide a foundation for the clinical translational development of objective markers and targeted therapeutics for attention impairment in MDD.

scholarly journals 50 Adjunctive Buprenorphine/Samidorphan Combination in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Phase 3 Long-term Extension Study Results

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Thase ◽  
Arielle D. Stanford ◽  
Asli Memisoglu ◽  
William Martin ◽  
Amy Claxton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
Long Term Treatment

AbstractIntroductionBuprenorphine/samidorphan (BUP/SAM), a combination of BUP (a µ-opioid receptor partial agonist and κ-antagonist) and SAM (a sublingually bioavailable µ-opioid antagonist), is an investigational opioid system modulator for depression. BUP/SAM has shown efficacy versus placebo as an adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) and a consistent safety profile in previously reported, placebo-controlled clinical studies.1,2Study Objective(s)1. To characterize the safety profile following long-term treatment with BUP/SAM2. To explore depression symptoms and remission rates in patients with MDD following long-term treatment with BUP/SAMMethodsFORWARD-2 (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02141399) enrolled patients who had participated in 1 of 4 controlled studies as well as de novo patients. All patients had a confirmed diagnosis of MDD, had a history of inadequate response to standard antidepressant therapies (ADTs), and had been treated with an adequate dose of an established ADT for ≥8weeks before BUP/SAM initiation. ADT dosage could be titrated, but the ADT could not be changed. During the study, patients received open-label, sublingual BUP/SAM 2mg/2mg as adjunctive treatment for up to 52weeks. Safety (primary objective) was assessed via adverse events (AEs), vital signs, laboratory analytes, and electrocardiography. Suicidal ideation or behavior (SIB) was evaluated by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Abuse potential, dependence, and withdrawal were assessed by AEs and the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included mean Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores and remission rate (MADRS ≤10).ResultsOf 1454 total patients, 49% completed the 52-week study, 11% discontinued due to an AE, and 40% discontinued because of other reasons as of the interim data cutoff date (April 30, 2017). Most AEs were of mild/moderate severity. Serious AEs were reported in 3.2% of patients. AEs occurring in ≥10% of patients were nausea, headache, constipation, dizziness, and somnolence. There was no evidence of increased risk of SIB with BUP/SAM. Incidence of euphoria-related events was low (1.2%). After abrupt discontinuation of BUP/SAM, there was little evidence of withdrawal. BUP/SAM was not associated with meaningful changes in laboratory or metabolic parameters or in bodyweight. The mean MADRS score decreased from 22.9 (±9.7) at baseline to 9.8 (±8.8) after 52weeks. The remission rate at 52weeks was 52.5%.ConclusionsLong-term treatment with BUP/SAM did not reveal any new safety findings and confirmed that the risk of abuse and dependence with BUP/SAM was low. BUP/SAM maintained an antidepressant effect for up to 52weeks of treatment in patients with MDD.Funding Acknowledgements: Alkermes, Inc.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document