scholarly journals RECONSTRUCTION PROTECTION OF LAW OF VICTIMS OF VICTIMS BASED ON JUSTICE VALUES

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 272
Author(s):  
Ervin Hengki
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Difficult Case ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process ◽  
Way Of Thinking ◽  
The Law

The crime of rape is the most difficult case in the settlement, either at the stage of investigation, prosecution, or at the stage of the adjudication of the verdict. Legal protection of victims of criminal rape in positive law in Indonesia is currently not based on the value of justice, because there are still weaknesses, namely the weakness of the law, the weakness of the approach / way of thinking of law enforcers, as well as the weaknesses during the criminal justice process.

scholarly journals THE PROGRESIVE RECHTSVINDING IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 214
Author(s):  
Wahyu Wahyu
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
New Beginning ◽  
The Social ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process ◽  
Substantive Justice ◽  
The Law

The positive law still dominates in Indonesian’s law. Currently the legal institutions must do a new beginning. Legal proceedings not often able to resolve the law issue clearly, even provide the substantive justice for both of the perpetrators and the victims. The discovery of progressive law in the criminal justice process is indispensable today.  For example is to implement the progressive judge’s decision that’s mean it is not just legalistic as a depictions of the constitution, judge’s decision not only to maintain order but to deliver improvements in public and to build the social harmonitations. For the last, judge’s decision must be visionary that reborned the courage morality  and legal breakthrough for the better nation.

The Criminal Process

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liz Campbell ◽  
Andrew Ashworth ◽  
Mike Redmayne
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Research Policy ◽  
Criminal Trials ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process ◽  
The Law ◽  
Normative Issues ◽  
Area Of Study

The Criminal Process continues to provides a reflective, contextualized consideration of doctrinal, practical, and normative issues in criminal processes and procedures. The text draws on arguments from the law, research, policy, and principle, to present an overview of this area of study. It focuses on England and Wales, with occasional comparative references. The book includes new coverage of contemporary issues, such as the disclosure of evidence in criminal trials and the treatment of victims, and on diversity and discrimination within the criminal justice process. Further reading suggestions and discussion questions are included at the end of each chapter.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI DIVERSI GUNA MEWUJUDKAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK.

Jurnal Hukum ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Aryani Witasari ◽  
Muhammad Sholikul Arif
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Offenders ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process

The research objective is to identify and analyze the implementation of Diversion in order to realize Restorative Justice in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in an effort to provide legal protection for child criminal offenders. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical or library law research or doctrinal law research, namely legal research by examining library materials and secondary materials, the results of the study found that the obligation to seek diversion with the Restorative Justice approach at every stage in the criminal justice process Children must be carried out in the Criminal Justice System, Diversion as a step towards transferring the settlement of children's cases from the criminal justice process to non-criminal justice processes by prioritizing the Restorative Justice approach which can be carried out by way of deliberation or mediation which emphasizes efforts to restore back to its original state in a friendly manner.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF NOTARY HONORARY COUNCIL CONSENT AS GROUNDS OF IMPUNITY (STRAFUITSLAUTINGSGRONDEN) AGAINST REVELATION OF SECRETS

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
Gaza Carumna Iskadrenda ◽  
Anggita Mustika Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process

<p><em>Article 66 paragraph (1) Act Number 2 of 2014 essentially regulates the consent of the Notary Honorary Council in the criminal justice process. The provisions in the a quo article have been still being applied and become a positive law in Indonesia. One of the criminal justice process in the notarial field relates to the criminal act of revelation of secrets as regulated in Article number 322 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. The consent given by the Notary Honorary Council as outlined above can certainly be viewed in the context of criminal law.</em></p><p><em><em>The research is a normative legal research using secondary data of both primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data collecting technique used is documentary study with written materials as the data collection tool to be analyzed qualitatively using content analysis.</em></em></p><p><em><em>The research result showed that in the context of criminal law, basically a notary who provides a copy of the deed and/or documents attached to the minuta deed or notarial protocol in the notarial archives for the purpose of the investigator, the public prosecutor or the judge has committed a criminal act of revelation of secrets as stipulated in Article number 322 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. However, the notary is not necessarily criminally liable considering the consent of the Notary Honorary Council as the grounds of impunity.</em></em></p><p><em><br /></em></p><p><em><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>: Notary Honorary Council consent, grounds of impunity, criminal act of revelation of secrets.</em></em></p>

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI SAKSI MAHKOTA DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN ASAS NON SELF INCRIMINATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1928
Author(s):  
Ni Kadek Dripta Yanti ◽  
I Ketut Mertha
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui (1) eksistensi saksi mahkota dalam proses peradilan pidana di Indonesia berdasarkan asas non self incrimination; dan (2) perlindungan hukum terhadap saksi mahkota. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) Eksistensi saksi mahkota dalam proses peradilan pidana di Indonesia berdasarkan asas non self incrimination sudah lazim digunakan. Kehadiran saksi mahkota baru dikatakan tidak bertentangan dengan asas non self incrimination jika dilakukan sesuai dengan apa yang diatur dalam Pasal 199 jo. Pasal 200 Rancangan KUHAP versi Januari 2009; dan (2) Perlindungan hukum terhadap saksi mahkota, seperti perlindungan terhadap saksi sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, namun kepada saksi mahkota diberikan juga keringanan hukuman bahkan dibebaskan dari penuntutan jika peranannya dianggap yang paling ringan.  The objective of this research to reveal (1) the existence of a crown witness in the criminal justice process in Indonesia based on the principle of non self-incrimination; and (2) legal protection of crown witnesses. The result of this research indicates that (1) The existence of crown witnesses in criminal justice processes in Indonesia based on the principle of non-self-incrimination is commonly used. The presence of a new crown witness is said not to contradict the principle of non-self-incrimination if it is carried out in accordance with Article 199 jo. Article 200 of the January 2009 version of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code; and (2) Legal protection for crown witnesses, such as protection for witnesses as regulated in Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims, however crown witnesses are also given leniency and even exemption from prosecution if their role is considered the lightest.

scholarly journals PERWUJUDAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK MELALUI DIVERSI

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Agustiani Sianturi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
The Other ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Juvenile Deliquency ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process ◽  
The Law ◽  
And Training

Every year, children in conflict with the law increases so it is needed to handle an alternative in the way to enforce restorative justice. Bill Number 11 0f 2012 concerning Juvinele Justice System which is accomodated to handle Juvenile Deliquency for diversion. This regulation defines diversion is the transfer of the settlement of the child to the criminal justice process outside the criminal justice process. Diversion obligates to be done by officers started from police investigator, public prosecutor until judge. The important of handling of diversion process for children in conflict with the law needed a commitment for every single officers to apply diversion process. On the other hand, education and training should be given to every officers especially police investigator, public prosecutor even judge relates handling children in conflict with the law.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM WHISTLEBLOWER DALAM UPAYA PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriyadi Supriyadi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process

 Perlindungan hukum terhadap whistleblower secara komprehensif seharusnya berlaku baik pada semua tahap peradilan (mulai dari tahap pelaporan, penyelidikan, penyidikan, penuntutan, dan pemeriksaan di persidangan) maupun setelah proses peradilan selesai. Hal ini disebabkan terkadang dalam kondisi tertentu pada suatu tindak pidana tertentu, ancaman dan teror bagi whistleblower akan tetap mengikuti setelah proses peradilan pidana selesai. Munculnya dendam  kesumat terdakwa atau terpidana yang telah dilaporkan tindak pidananya, relatif dimungkinkan memunculkan ketidaknyamanan dan membuat bahaya bagi kehidupan whistleblower yang terkait.Kata kunci:  whistleblower, korupsi, penanggulangan Comprehensive legal protection against whistleblowers should apply to all stages of the judiciary (starting from the reporting, investigation, investigation, prosecution, and examination phases) and after the judicial process is complete. This is because sometimes in certain conditions for a particular crime, the threat and terror of the whistleblower will continue to follow after the criminal justice process is complete. The emergence of revenge from the defendant or convicted person who has been reported as a criminal act, is relatively possible to cause discomfort and create a danger to the life of the related whistleblower. Keywords: whistleblower, corruption, countermeasures 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document