scholarly journals Assessment of Cancer Risks Associated with Patient Organ Doses from Medical Diagnostic Computed Tomography in Bangladesh

Author(s):  
Md Shakilur Rahman
Author(s):  
Donald McLean ◽  
Claire-Louise Chapple

The computed tomography (CT) medical examination is the highest single source of radiation to the general public in the developed world. Its use is rapidly growing, as is its technical complexity. The primary dosimetry formalism is based on the computed tomography dose index (CTDI), which can be measured in air or in standard phantoms using a calibrated pencil ionization chamber with adaptations for wide beam scanners. Displayed dose parameters can be used with caution to estimate patient organ doses, effective dose, and risk, using a variety of models and software. An understanding of automatic exposure control and the influence of patient size is essential when interpreting dosimetry results. CT examination protocols require optimisation, including the appropriate use of newly available dose reduction features. Particular consideration needs to be given to paediatric CT and to specialist applications such as radiotherapy planning, cardiac CT and volume imaging.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Oono ◽  
Fujio Araki ◽  
Shoya Tsuduki ◽  
Keiichi Kawasaki

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (1126) ◽  
pp. 20210471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Berrington de Gonzalez ◽  
Elisa Pasqual ◽  
Lene Veiga

20 years ago, 3 manuscripts describing doses and potential cancer risks from CT scans in children raised awareness of a growing public health problem. We reviewed the epidemiological studies that were initiated in response to these concerns that assessed cancer risks from CT scans using medical record linkage. We evaluated the study methodology and findings and provide recommendations for optimal study design for new efforts. We identified 17 eligible studies; 13 with published risk estimates, and 4 in progress. There was wide variability in the study methodology, however, which made comparison of findings challenging. Key differences included whether the study focused on childhood or adulthood exposure, radiosensitive outcomes (e.g. leukemia, brain tumors) or all cancers, the exposure metrics (e.g. organ doses, effective dose or number of CTs) and control for biases (e.g. latency and exclusion periods and confounding by indication). We were able to compare results for the subset of studies that evaluated leukemia or brain tumors. There were eight studies of leukemia risk in relation to red bone marrow (RBM) dose, effective dose or number of CTs; seven reported a positive dose–response, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05) in four studies. Six of the seven studies of brain tumors also found a positive dose–response and in five, this was statistically significant. Mean RBM dose ranged from 6 to 12 mGy and mean brain dose from 18 to 43 mGy. In a meta-analysis of the studies of childhood exposure the summary ERR/100 mGy was 1.78 (95%CI: 0.01–3.53) for leukemia/myelodisplastic syndrome (n = 5 studies) and 0.80 (95%CI: 0.48–1.12) for brain tumors (n = 4 studies) (p-heterogeneity >0.4). Confounding by cancer pre-disposing conditions was unlikely in these five studies of leukemia. The summary risk estimate for brain tumors could be over estimated, however, due to reverse causation. In conclusion, there is growing evidence from epidemiological data that CT scans can cause cancer. The absolute risks to individual patients are, however, likely to be small. Ongoing large multicenter cohorts and future pooling efforts will provide more precise risk quantification.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 308-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Giansante ◽  
Juliana C. Martins ◽  
Denise Y. Nersissian ◽  
Karen C. Kiers ◽  
Fernando U. Kay ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document