Diversification, Design, Strategic Planning and New Product Development: A Jewellery Industry Knowledge Transfer Partnership

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gay Penfold
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 16-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Acar ◽  
Alan T. Burns ◽  
Pratim Datta

The literature on learning in new product development (NPD) documents the processes globally but is short on specifics. Knowledge levels are not clearly conceptualized, nor are there clear devices for documenting knowledge transfers in terms of knowledge levels. This paper presents the methods of a qualitative research approach for measuring knowledge transfer directly in terms of knowledge. The paper specifically addresses the commonly avoided dimension of knowledge, depth. The methods are derived from a real-life comparative case study exploring knowledge sharing in product development. Our focused interview approach has been refined to avoid unproductive digressions by the subjects and certain forms of bias, yet still obtain rich accounts of project events. Evidence of transfer obtained by the interviews is analysed in terms of three knowledge dimensions: scope, depth and action. Methods for aggregating and interpreting data are discussed and an operational flowchart for knowledge transfer coding is proposed.


Author(s):  
Ilan Oshri ◽  
Julia Kotlarsky ◽  
Paul C. van Fenema

Recent years have witnessed the globalisation of many industries. Consequently, globally distributed and virtual teams have become increasingly common in many areas, for example, in new product development and information systems (IS) development. Achieving successful collaborations has become a key challenge for globally distributed organizations, and it is largely dependent on teams’ ability to transfer and share knowledge.


2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Großmann ◽  
Ellen Filipović ◽  
Luisa Lazina

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (02) ◽  
pp. 1250013 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUSHAN ZHAO ◽  
MARILYN LAVIN

This study examines the factors (trust, communication, supplier relationship specific adaptations, supplier flexibility, and relationship history) that influence knowledge transfer from the supplier to the customer firm in new product development, and the impact of knowledge transfer on product development performance. It also suggests that knowledge tacitness moderates these relationships. Based on a sample of 186 US firms, this study finds that trust, communication, supplier relationship specific adaptations, and supplier flexibility influence knowledge transfer. Knowledge transfer, in turn, has an effect on new product development performance. Mixed findings have also been reported in this paper with respect to the moderating effects of knowledge tacitness. Trust, supplier flexibility, and relationship history are more important for tacit knowledge transfer than for explicit knowledge. Knowledge tacitness does not moderate the relationship between knowledge transfer and NPD performance. However, the results show that both tacit and explicit knowledge transfer significantly affects NPD performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document