scholarly journals Evaluating the Effectiveness of Concurrent Review

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celia McGillivray

<p>Concurrent review may be seen as a relatively new quality improvement strategy or an improvement over an existing quality improvement strategy, but research is scant. This strategy incorporates several key elements of performance feedback, which may be broadly defined as sharing non-judgmental information to professionals regarding discrepancies between their actual performance and standards of care. The distinction between concurrent review and performance feedback is the timing of information provided. Concurrent review incorporates the provision ofmedical information regarding a provider's performance during the patient's hospitalization, so that the plan ofcare is altered. This study evaluated concurrent review by examining the impact on stroke measures and whether physician and nurse practice patterns in managing stroke patients were altered.</p>

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samira Farouk ◽  
Sarah Atallah ◽  
Kirk N Campbell ◽  
Joseph A Vassalotti ◽  
Jaime Uribarri

Abstract Background: Kidney transplantation remains the optimal therapy for patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD), though a small fraction of patients on dialysis are on organ waitlists. An important barrier to preemptive kidney transplantation and successful waitlisting is timely referral to a kidney transplant center. We implemented a quality improvement strategy to improve outpatient kidney transplant referrals in a single center academic outpatient nephrology clinic. Methods: Over a 3 month period (July 1 - September 30, 2016), we assessed the baseline kidney transplantation referral rate at our outpatient nephrology clinic for patients 18 - 75 years old with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 20 mL/min/1.73m 2 (2 values over 90 days apart). Charts were manually reviewed by two reviewers to look for kidney transplant referrals and documentation of discussions about kidney transplantation. We then performed a root cause analysis to explore potential barriers to kidney transplantation. Our intervention began on July 1, 2017 and included the implementation of a column in the electronic medical record (EMR) which displayed the patient's last eGFR as part of the clinic schedule. Physicians were given a document listing their patients to be seen that day with an eGFR of < 20 mL/min/1.73m 2 . Results: 54 unique patients with eGFR ≤ 20 ml/min/1.73 m 2 were identified who were seen in the Clinic between July 1, 2016 and September 30, 2016. 29.6% (16) eligible patients were referred for kidney transplantation evaluation. 69.5% (37) of these patients were not referred for kidney transplant evaluation. 46.3% (25) did not have documentation regarding kidney transplant in the EMR. Following the intervention, 66 unique patients met criteria for eligibility for kidney transplant evaluation. Kidney transplant referrals increased to 60.6% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our pilot implementation study of a strategy to improve outpatient kidney transplant referrals showed that a free, simple, scalable intervention can significantly improve kidney transplant referrals in the outpatient setting Next steps include further study of the impact of early referral to kidney transplant centers on preemptive and living donor kidney transplantation as well as successful waitlisting.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kirschner ◽  
J. Braspenning ◽  
I. Maassen ◽  
A. Bonte ◽  
J. Burgers ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samira Farouk ◽  
Sarah Atallah ◽  
Kirk N Campbell ◽  
Joseph A Vassalotti ◽  
Jaime Uribarri

Abstract Background: Kidney transplantation remains the optimal therapy for patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD), though a small fraction of patients on dialysis are on organ waitlists. An important barrier to preemptive kidney transplantation and successful waitlisting is timely referral to a kidney transplant center. We implemented a quality improvement strategy to improve outpatient kidney transplant referrals in a single center academic outpatient nephrology clinic. Methods: Over a 3 month period (July 1 - September 30, 2016), we assessed the baseline kidney transplantation referral rate at our outpatient nephrology clinic for patients 18 - 75 years old with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 20 mL/min/1.73m 2 (2 values over 90 days apart). Charts were manually reviewed by two reviewers to look for kidney transplant referrals and documentation of discussions about kidney transplantation. We then performed a root cause analysis to explore potential barriers to kidney transplantation. Our intervention began on July 1, 2017 and included the implementation of a column in the electronic medical record (EMR) which displayed the patient's last eGFR as part of the clinic schedule. Physicians were given a document listing their patients to be seen that day with an eGFR of < 20 mL/min/1.73m 2 . Results: 54 unique patients with eGFR ≤ 20 ml/min/1.73 m 2 were identified who were seen in the Clinic between July 1, 2016 and September 30, 2016. 29.6% (16) eligible patients were referred for kidney transplantation evaluation. 69.5% (37) of these patients were not referred for kidney transplant evaluation. 46.3% (25) did not have documentation regarding kidney transplant in the EMR. Following the intervention, 66 unique patients met criteria for eligibility for kidney transplant evaluation. Kidney transplant referrals increased to 60.6% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our pilot implementation study of a strategy to improve outpatient kidney transplant referrals showed that a free, simple, scalable intervention can significantly improve kidney transplant referrals in the outpatient setting Next steps include further study of the impact of early referral to kidney transplant centers on preemptive and living donor kidney transplantation as well as successful waitlisting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document