scholarly journals Combined protocol for remote ischemic conditioning as the method of cardioprotection in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Author(s):  
E. A. Koreneva ◽  
T. L. Denisevich ◽  
A. G. Mrochek ◽  
V. I. Stelmashok

Background. There is currently no commonly accepted strategy for limiting the reperfusion injury that occurs after revascularization in patients with myocardial infarction. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a promising cardioprotective method.Material and Methods. Patients with acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n = 87) were included in an open-label prospective randomized controlled trial. Control group comprised patients with STEMI who underwent only primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) (n = 44). Patients of intervention group (n = 43) underwent PPCI and remote ischemic perconditioning combined with postconditioning (RIC). The efficacy of RIC was assessed based on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging data.Results. The medians of left ventricular (LV) infarct size were significantly higher in patients of control group: 44.8 (33.6; 55.5) versus 52.7 (35.5; 73.9) mL (p = 0.039) at day 10 after STEMI and 34.0 (25.8; 39.8) mL versus 46.0 (32.8; 55.0) mL six months after STEMI in control and intervention groups, respectively (p = 0.004). The groups of patients did not differ in the sizes of area at risk relative to the total LV myocardial volume: 40 (35; 45) and 43 (34; 49)% in control and intervention groups, respectively (р = 0.232). The groups significantly differed in the ratios of infarct size to area at risk: 70.3 (65.1; 86.6)% in control group versus 63.5 (52.7; 72.0)% in intervention group (р = 0.014) as well as in the myocardial salvage indexes: 29.7 (13.5; 34.9)% in control group versus 36.5 (28.0; 47.3)% in intervention group (р = 0.014). The study showed the tendency to greater LV myocardial salvage in intervention group versus control group at six-months follow-up (р = 0.073). The groups significantly differed in the medians of microvascular obstruction volume: 1.9 (1.4; 2.9) mL in intervention group versus 2.5 (1.8; 8.1) mL in control group (p = 0.049) as well as in the proportions of microvascular obstruction in the LV myocardium: 0.94 (0.79; 1.37)% in intervention group versus 1.50 (0.89; 3.66)% in control group (р = 0.046).Conclusion. The RIC method combined with PPCI contributed to the limitation of infarct and microvascular obstruction sizes and was associated with an increase in the myocardial salvage index in STEMI patients.

Author(s):  
Mohammed Rouzbahani ◽  
Mohsen Rezaie ◽  
Nahid Salehi ◽  
Parisa Janjani ◽  
Reza Heidari Moghadam ◽  
...  

Background: Doing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the first hours of myocardial infraction (MI) is effective in re-establishment of blood flow. Anticoagulation treatment should be prescribed in patients undergoing PCI to decrease the side effects of ischemia. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of heparin prescription after PCI on short-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Materials: This randomized clinical trial study was conducted at Imam Ali cardiovascular center at Kermanshah university of medical science (KUMS), Iran. Between April 2019 to October 2019, 400 patients with STEMI which candidate to PCI were enrolled. Patients randomly divided in two groups: intervention group (received 5,000 units of heparin after PCI until first 24 hours, every 6 hours) and control group (did not receive heparin). Data were collected using a checklist developed based on the study's aims. Differences between groups were assessed using independent t-tests and chi-square (or Fisher exact tests).Result: Observed that, mean prothrombin time (PT) (13.30±1.60 vs. 12.21±1.15, p<0.001) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) (35.30±3.08 vs. 34.41±3.01, p=0.003) were significantly higher in intervention group compared to control group. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0/1 after primary PCI was significantly more frequently in control group (5.5% vs. 1.0%, p=0.034). The mean of ejection fraction (EF) after PCI (47.58±7.12 vs. 45.15±6.98, p<0.001) was significantly higher in intervention group. Intervention group had a statistically significant shorter length of hospital stay (4.71±1.03 vs. 6.12±1.10, p<0.001). There was higher incidence of re-vascularization (0% vs. 3.0%; p=0.013) and re-MI (0% vs. 2.5%; p=0.024) in the control group.Conclusion: Performing primary PCI with receiving heparin led to improve TIMI flow and consequently better EF. Receiving heparin is associated with lower risk of re-MI and re-vascularization.


Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (7) ◽  
pp. 531-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Testori ◽  
Dietrich Beitzke ◽  
Andreas Mangold ◽  
Fritz Sterz ◽  
Christian Loewe ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of prereperfusion hypothermia initiated in the out-of-hospital setting in awake patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on myocardial salvage measured by cardiac MRI (CMR).MethodsHypothermia was initiated within 6 hours of symptom onset by the emergency medical service with surface cooling pads and cold saline, and continued in the cath lab with endovascular cooling (target temperature: ≤35°C at time of reperfusion). Myocardial salvage index (using CMR) was compared in a randomised, controlled, open-label, endpoint blinded trial to a not-cooled group of patients at day 4±2 after the event.ResultsAfter postrandomisation exclusion of 19 patients a total of 101 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (control group: n=54; hypothermia group: n=47). Target temperature was reached in 38/47 patients (81%) in the intervention group. Study-related interventions resulted in a delay in time from first medical contact to reperfusion of 14 min (control group 89±24 min; hypothermia group 103±21 min; p<0.01). Myocardial salvage index was 0.37 (±0.26) in the control group and 0.43 (±0.27) in the hypothermia group (p=0.27). No differences in cardiac biomarkers or clinical outcomes were found. In a CMR follow-up 6 months after the initial event no significant differences were detected.ConclusionOut-of-hospital induced therapeutic hypothermia as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention did not improve myocardial salvage in patients with STEMI.Trial registration numberNCT01777750


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Ekstroem ◽  
J V W Nielsen ◽  
L Nepper-Christensen ◽  
K A Ahtarovski ◽  
K Kyhl ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), reperfusion injury accounts for a significant part of the final infarct size, which is directly related to patient prognosis. In animal studies brief periods of ischemia in non-infarct related coronary arteries protects the myocardium via remote ischemic perconditioning. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measures functional significant coronary stenosis which may offer remote ischemic perconditioning of the myocardium. It has not previously been investigated if FFR-significant stenosis in non-culprit myocardium offers cardioprotection following STEMI. Purpose To investigate cardioprotective effect of FFR-significant multivessel disease (MVD) on final infarct size and myocardial salvage in a large contemporary cohort of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods and results We included 509 patients with STEMI from the DANAMI-3 trial, divided into three groups: 388 (76%) patients had single vessel disease (SVD), 34 (7%) had non-FFR-significant MVD and 192 (17%) had FFR-significant MVD. CMR was performed at baseline and three months after primary PCI. There was no difference in final infarct size; mean infarct size (% left ventricular mass) SVD 9±3%; non-FFR-significant MVD 9±3%; and FFR-significant MVD 9±3%, p=0.95, or in myocardial salvage index (MSI) between groups, calculated as (area-at-risk – infarct size)/area-at-risk; mean index (%) SVD 67±23%; non-FFR-significant MVD 68±19%; and FFR-significant MVD 67±21%, p=0,99. In multivariable regression analyses FFR-significant MVD was not associated med larger MSI (p=0.84) or lower infarct size (p=0.60). Figure 1. A. Late gadolinium (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) image of a mid-ventricular short-axis slice. Hyperintense signals (arrow) shows contrast enhancement in the anterior-septal segments, indicating myocardial infarction (MI). B. Same patient. T2-weighted image of the same mid-ventricular short-axis slice. Hyperintense signals (arrows) shows edema in the anterior-septal segments. Conclusions FFR-significant functional MVD of non-culprit myocardium does not offer cardioprotection in patients following STEMI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document