scholarly journals The outcome of two stage repair in anorectal malformations with rectovestibular fistula.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (07) ◽  
pp. 1527-1532
Author(s):  
Shafiq ur Rehman ◽  
Yasir Makki ◽  
Fareena Ishtiaq ◽  
Saad Fazal ◽  
Nauman Aziz ◽  
...  

Wound infection and dehiscence after recto vestibular fistula repair may affect the fecal continent mechanisms. A significant number of children with anorectal malformations have long term social, economic and psychological problems due to fecal incontinence. The role of protective colostomy should not be under estimated especially when you are treating the children from poor socioeconomic settings with compromised nutritional status. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of two stage limited posterior sagittal anorectoplasty with protective colostomy in female patients of congenital recto vestibular fistula. Study Design: Prospective study. Settings: Department of Pediatric Surgery, DHQ Teaching Hospital Sahiwal. Period: January 2016 to December 2018. Material & Methods: Thirty four girls with anorectal malformation and recto vestibular fistula underwent two stage anorectoplasty. Divided sigmoid colostomy and limited posterior sagittal anorectoplasty was performed in first stage. Six to eight weeks later stoma was closed in second stage. All the patients were evaluated for fecal continence, constipation, bowel function and complications of stoma formation, definite procedure and stoma closure. Results: The age distribution of patients at the time of surgery ranged from 9 months to 5 years (mean 27.32 months). During the first stage of repair, three patients (8.82 %) developed wound infection. Mucosal prolapse was seen in two patients (5.88%). Anal stenosis was noticed in one patient (2.94%). Seven patients (20.58%) developed peri stoma skin excoriation. Stoma prolapse was observed in three patients (8.82%). Four patients (11.76%) developed wound infection after colostomy closure. During the follow up period, constipation was reported in five patients (14.70%) and soiling in one patient (2.94%). Conclusion: Two stage correction of congenital recto vestibular fistula under the cover of colostomy is safe strategy. It is strongly recommended in a setup with limited resources and weak infrastructure. It is also useful for patients from poor socioeconomic settings.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Li ◽  
Jun Wang

AbstractThe anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula is a rare anomaly in the spectrum of anorectal malformations. Aim of the study is to describe the series of patients with anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula and compare the outcome with patient with standard perineal fistula. From March 2012 to January 2019, 7 patients who suffered from anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula were retrospectively reviewed. Three were operated on primarily by our department, and 4 cases were re-operated after a perineal anoplasty repair performed elsewhere. Four were operated by laparoscopy assisted anorectoplasty, and 3 cases were repaired by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. The follow-up outcomes were compared with 71 cases of normal perineal fistula (NPF) in the same period. 7 cases have been followed up for 0.5–4 years (M = 2.57 ± 1.26) after definitive surgery. Their bowel function score was lower than normal perineal fistula (SPF = 12, range: 5–18; NPF = 18.5, range: 18–20). Four cases underwent anorectomanometry. The incidence of rectoanal inhibitory reflex was lower in the special type group. (p = 0.14). Three cases of contrast enema using barium: 2 cases of colorectal dilatation and thickening changes, 1 case showed no obvious abnormalities. Anorectal perineal fistula should be examined by distal colostogram at preoperation. This should be altered in: When suspecting a case of anorectal malformation type long perineal fistula a preoperative contrast enema could give insight of the anatomy befor performing a anoplasty.


2004 ◽  
Vol 57 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 284-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Bukarica ◽  
Smiljana Marinkovic ◽  
Vesna Zrnic-Pekovic ◽  
Dusanka Dobanovacki ◽  
Vladimir Borisev ◽  
...  

Introduction Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSAKP) was introduced in 1982, by Repa and de Vries, as a new surgical procedure for patients with anorectal malformations. It was supposed to provide better chance for normal fecal continence. Meterial and methods Between 1991 and 2000, 50 patients with anorectal abnormalities underwent PSARP. In 43 patients PSARP was primary operation and in 7 it was a secondary procedure. At the time of study patients were not younger than 3, and not older than 13 years. Patients and their parents were interviewed, and fecal continence was graded as follows: voluntary bowel contractions, soiling less than once a week, soiling more than once a week, daily soiling and constipation. Results Amongst patients who underwent primary surgical correction, 74% had voluntary bowel contractions. Babies with perineal fistula, rectal atresia and stenosis presented with best results in term of voluntary bowel contractions (100%), as with vestibular fistula, ten of eleven patients. Only 18% of patients (atresia without fistula, vestibular fistula and bulbourethral fistula) had soiling. Patients with perineal fistula and rectal atresia and stenosis 40% were totally continent (voluntary bowel movements without soiling). The most frequent sequel was constipation, which appeared in 48%, without coincidence with frequency of soiling. The problem of constipation was surprisingly more frequent in patients with expected better prognosis in fecal continence. Conclusion Although PSARP offers a good esthetic result, only two third of patients have voluntary bowel movements and in about half there exists a problem with constipation, with necessary further treatment.


1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
Ramananda Prasad Chaudhary ◽  
Bijay Thapa ◽  
Santosh Thana ◽  
Pradeep B Singh

Introduction: Despite a better understanding of the embryology, anatomy of anorectal malformations and of the physiology of continence, the management of children born with imperforate anus continues to be a surgical challenge and is still fraught with numerous complications and often leads to less than perfect qualitative results. Pediatric patients with recto-vestibular fistula have good prognoses in terms of bowel function when properly treated. Aim & Objective: The study was designed to assess the surgical morbidity of single stage Anterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty (ASARP). Methodology: This prospective study was carried for a period of 26 months. It included a total of 48 female patients (aged 0 - 14 years) with diagnosis of Anorectal Malformations (ARM) with vestibular fistula or perineal ectopic anus. In ASARP, Patient in lithotomy position, the anterior portion of sphincter muscles were cut through a midline perineal skin incision, rectum was separated from the vagina & then rectum was pulled through the center of these muscles. The perineal body was reconstructed and the normal appearance of perineum was achieved. Results: Short-term surgical outcome was satisfactory in all cases. No one needed colostomy. Conclusion: Single-stage ASARP is a good approach in experience hands for ARM with vestibular fistula and perineal ectopic anus in females and thereby complications and time involved in staged procedures including colostomy can be avoided. Key words: Anterior sagittal anorectoplasty, anorectal malformations, perineal ectopic anus, vestibular fistula. DOI: 10.3126/jnps.v30i1.2458 Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society Vol.30(1) 2010 37-43


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
Muhammad Riaz-Ul-Haq ◽  
◽  
Muhammad Kashif Chishti ◽  
Arsalan Raza Wasti ◽  
Mazhar Jam ◽  
...  

Background: Anorectal malformations (ARM) in girls comprise of a wide spectrum of disease ranging from imperforate anus to common cloaca, a complex malformation. Recto-vestibular fistula (RVF) is the commonest ARM in female patients. Many surgical procedures have been mentioned in the literature but trend is changing from staged to single stage procedure. Objectives: To evaluate post operative results of Single Stage Sphincter Sparing Scarless (5S) procedure for RVF. Methods: It is a retrospective case series of 24 patients with RVF who were admitted in the Department of Paediatric Surgery Jinnah Hospital Lahore and the Children Hospital and the Institute of Child Health Multan from October 2018 to September 2019, between 14 days and 4 years of age , underwent single stage sphincter sparing scarless procedure without any colostomy, anterior or posterior midline incision or division of sphincteric complex. Site of neo-anus was marked with the help of muscle stimulator and all surgeries were done under general anesthesia after meticulous gut preparation. Post operatively patients were kept nil per oral for 5 days to avoid wound contamination due to stool. Follow up was done for six months to evaluate outcome. Authors used a new name for single stage procedure. Results: Mean age was 160 days, operative time 78 minutes and hospital stay 6.8 days. 9 (37.5%) patients were diagnosed with some other associated congenital anomalies like congenital heart disease (CHD), renal anomalies, hemisacrum, syndactyly, talipes equino varus(TEV) and Downs syndrome. As a whole 13(24) presented with complication. 4(16.64%) patients presented with constipation, 3(12.5%) excoriation, 2(8.32%) anal stenosis, 2(8.32%) soiling, 1(4.16%) retraction of rectum and 1(4.16%) superficial wound infection. Patient with retraction was planned for re-do surgery, all others were managed conservatively. Conclusion: Single stage sphincter sparing scarless ( 5S) procedure for recto-vestibular fistula is safe, simple and cost effective technique. Patient suffering is minimum, as there is no colostomy, so no multiple surgeries. Complications are minimum and comparable to staged procedure.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Li ◽  
Jun Wang

Abstract Background The perineal fistula with high dilated colon is a rare anomalous in the spectrum of anorectal malformations. The aim of this study is to explore the diagnosis and treatment of this special type of perineal fistula (SPF), and to avoid the severe consequence due to misdiagnosis.Methods From March 2012 to January 2019, 7 patients who suffered from perineal fistula with high dilated colon were retrospectively reviewed. Three were operated on primarily by our department, and 4 cases were re-operated after a perineal anoplasty repair performed elsewhere. Four were operated by laparoscopic anorectoplasty (LARP), and 3 cases were repaired by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). The follow-up outcomes were compared with 71 cases of normal perineal fistula (NPF) in the same period.Results 7 cases have been followed up for 0.5-4 years (M=2.57±1.26) after definitive surgery. Their bowel function score (BFS) was lower than normal perineal fistula (SPF=12, rang:5-18; NPF=18.5, rang:18-20). Four cases underwent anorectomanometry. The incidence of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) was lower in the special type group. (p=0.14). Three cases of barium enema angiography: 2 cases of colorectal dilatation and thickening changes, 1 case showed no obvious abnormalities.Conclusions Anorectal perineal fistula should be examined by distal colostogram at preoperation. Select appropriate surgical approach is essential for children’s defecation function, and blind surgery can seriously affect long-term defecation function.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 243-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhanya Mullassery ◽  
Sumita Chhabra ◽  
Ashik Babu ◽  
Roberta Iacona ◽  
Simon Blackburn ◽  
...  

Aim Regular anal dilatations are commonly recommended in the postoperative management following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) in anorectal malformations (ARM). We hypothesized that routine postoperative dilatations may not affect surgical outcomes following PSARP. We compare surgical outcomes of routine postoperative dilatations versus no routine postoperative dilatations from two United Kingdom tertiary pediatric surgical centers. Materials and Methods This is retrospective records review of patients undergoing definitive surgery for ARM in two tertiary surgical centers in the UK over 5 years. Center A used a protocol of routine postoperative dilatations, and center B used a protocol, which used dilatations only for clinical indications of stricture. Data collected included ARM type, operative procedures, and postoperative interventions. All post-operative interventions under general anesthesia (GA) were compared between groups. Results From 2011 to 2015, 49 procedures (46 PSARPs) were performed in center A and 54 (52 PSARPs) in center B. Median follow up period was 31 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18–48). The first postoperative anal calibration under GA was documented for 43 (86%) patients in center A and for 42 (78%) patients in center B. Following this, center A followed routine postoperative dilatation (RPD) at home, and center B reserved further dilatations for specific indications. RPD was performed for 100% of patients in center A versus 8% in center B. Further anal dilatations under GA were performed in 19 (38%) children in center A and in 17 (34%) children in center B (p = 0.68). In center A, 10 patients (22%) needed further surgery versus 14 (28%) in center B (p = 0.48). Conclusion The use of routine postoperative dilatations does not significantly improve surgical outcomes following PSARP in ARM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document