Early results of different types of anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations

Objective: To document our experience with the technique of surgical repair in anorectal malformations (ARM) and the short term anatomical and functional outcomes. Methods: This study included total 31 babies. Fourteen were perineal fistula cases with age range between 1 to 4 days. Ten patients had vestibular fistula and seven had rectourinary fistula. Primary diverting colostomy was done for vestibular and rectourinary fistula patients. On the other hand low imperforate anus with anoperineal fistula without associated major anomalies had undergone fistulectomy and simple anoplasty. Results: Simple anoplasty was done for fourteen perineal fistula cases. Anterior sagittal anorectoplasty (ASARP) was done for 10 vestibular fistulae and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) was done in 10 recto-urinary fistula cases. Simple anoplasty and vestibular anus scored good (5-6) in 70% to 71% while PSARP scored fair in 58% of the cases. Postoperative mucosal prolapse, anal stenosis and retraction occurred in two, six and one patient respectively. Redo surgery was done in mucosal prolapse and retraction cases. Four responded to anal dilation and the other needed redo surgery by a simple cutback technique for anal stricture. Continence was assessed in 23 patients whose follow-up periods were longer than 3 years. Twenty one patients had a good score and two had a fair score. No patients had a poor score. Conclusion: Our approach has the following advantages: (i) The operative technique is simple and easy to perform. (ii) Minimal complication rate with good cosmetic results. Mediscope 2021;8(2): 75-79

Sacral Curvature in Addition to Sacral Ratio to Assess Sacral Development and the Association With the Type of Anorectal Malformations

Introduction: Sacral ratio (SR) is currently the only measurement to quantitatively evaluate sacral development in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM). This study proposes sacral curvature (SC) as a new indicator to qualitatively assess the sacrum and hypothesizes that sacral development, both quantitatively and qualitatively, can be an indicator to predict the type of ARM. The study aims to investigate the difference of SR and SC between ARM types and the association with the type of ARM.Methods and Materials: This study was retrospectively conducted between August 2008 and April 2019. Male patients with ARMs were enrolled and divided into three groups based on the types of ARM: (1) rectoperineal fistulae, (2) rectourethral-bulbar fistulae, and (3) rectourethral-prostatic or rectobladder-neck fistulae. SC was measured in the sagittal views of an MRI or a lateral radiograph of the sacrum.Results: Included in the study were 316 male patients with ARMs. SRs were 0.73 ± 0.12, 0.65 ± 0.12, and 0.57 ± 0.12 in perineal, bulbar, and prostatic/bladderneck fistula, respectively (p < 0.01). The SCs in perineal fistulae and bulbar fistulae were significantly higher than that in prostatic/bladderneck fistulae (0.25 ± 0.04, 0.22 ± 0.14, and 0.14 ± 0.18, p < 0.01). When SR ≥ 0.779, there was an 89.9% of possibility that the child has a perineal fistula. When SR ≤ 0.490 and SC ≤ 0, the possibilities of the child having prostatic/bladderneck fistulae were 91.6 and 89.5%, respectively. SC < 0 was also noted in 27 (27.8%), 19 (10.5%), and no (0%) patients of prostatic/bladderneck, bulbar, and perineal fistulae (p < 0.01), respectively. Sacral defect was noted in 63% of patients with SC ≤ 0, compared to none with SC > 0 (p < 0.01).Conclusions: The higher the rectal level is in an ARM, the lower are the objective measurements of the sacrum. SC ≤ 0 is associated with sacral defects and implies a high likelihood of prostatic/bladderneck fistulae.

Case Report: A Case Series of Rare High-Type Anorectal Malformations With Perineal Fistula: Beware of Urethral Involvement

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the more common congenital anomalies encountered in pediatric surgery where the majority are diagnosed in the early neonatal period. The etiology of ARM remains uncertain and is likely to be multifactorial. A majority of ARMs result from abnormal development of the urorectal septum in early fetal life. There can be a broad range of presentation features varying from low anomalies with perineal fistula to high anomalies mandating intricate management. To develop a standardized system for comparison in follow-up studies, the Krickenbeck classification was introduced according to the type of fistula. According to the Krickenbeck classification of ARM, those with a rectoperineal fistula are classified as low-type ARM and are usually managed with a perineal anoplasty without colostomy. In this case series, we describe two rare cases of distinct high and intermediate ARM with rectoperineal fistulas, which were thought to be low-type ARM but were subsequently found to have urethral involvement. Our cases consisted of high and intermediate ARMs, which were successfully treated with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty as described. These cases exemplified rare variants of ARM where rectoperineal fistulas can be associated with high-type anomalies. Rare-variant ARM with rectopenile or rectoscrotal fistula can be associated with high-type anomalies in contrast to classical rectoperineal fistulas. A high index of suspicion should remain in cases with previous urinary tract infection despite normal imaging. Careful planning is also needed with consideration of possible need for urethral repair during anoplasty, which was needed in both our cases.

Ileo-perineal fistula: Rare late complication after rectal amputation – clinical case

Abdominal-perineal rectal amputation retains a well-defined place in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer, despite technical advances. The authors present the case of a 67-year-old patient who developed an entero-perineal fistula involving the last ileal loop, two years after an abdominal-perineal rectal amputation for a radiotreated rectal neoplasm. For surgical treatment of the fistula, right ileo-hemicolectomy with ileo-transverse anastomosis were performed. The fistulous tract is treated by soft field typhoon meshing in the same manner of treating the perineal wound after rectal amputation. The evolution is favorable, with the closure of the perineal wound, 6 weeks after surgery. The peculiarity of the case consists in the way of surgical solution. This case presentation is important due to the rarity of the ileo-perineal fistula after amputation of the rectum, as well as due to the particular way of surgical resolution.

The Use of an Inanimate Simulation Model for the Correction of an Anorectal Malformation in the Training of Colorectal Pediatric Surgery

Introduction An anorectal malformation (ARM) is a congenital malformation that requires surgical correction. To acquire the skills needed to perform this complex procedure, an affordable simulation model has previously been developed and validated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the suitability of this ARM model (with perineal fistula) for training in hands-on workshops. Materials and Methods The ARM model consists of a wooden casing with disposable perineal body. Participants in several international pediatric colorectal hands-on workshops in 2019 and 2020 were asked to participate. They were divided in a target group and an experienced group based on experience. All practiced the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty procedure on the model with multimodality guidance. Subsequently, statements on the suitability of the model for use during hands-on workshops were scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Results A total of 80 participants were included (43 surgical specialists, 13 pediatric surgery fellows, and 25 residents). Nearly, all statements scored at least a mean of >4.0, all scored significantly better than a neutral opinion. The target group (n = 58) scored higher compared with the experienced group (n = 22) on “transferability of the skills to the clinical setting” (means 4.4 vs. 4.0, p = 0.038); however, the “suitability as a replacement for an animal model” scored significantly lower (means 3.6 vs. 3.9, p = 0.049). No other differences were found. Conclusion This affordable ARM model was regarded a suitable model for training during preclinical hands-on workshops and could be used for the specified steps of the procedure.

Development of a posterior sagittal anorectal surgical teaching model

Background An Anorectal Malformation (ARM) is a rare congenital malformation, which requires proper correction to ensure the best long-term prognosis. These procedures are relatively infrequent and complex, in which a structured approach is important. Therefore, training on an affordable model could be beneficial. Methods A low-cost ARM model was developed. The base was reusable and the perineal body disposable. Both expert pediatric surgeons (Experts) and residents/fellows (Target group) were recruited for this study. After testing the model, they completed a questionnaire regarding the realism and didactic value of the model, using a 5-point Likert scale. Results Forty-four participants were recruited (Target group n = 20, Experts n = 24). The model has high mean scores of 3.8–4.4 for the total group and even higher on several aspects by the Target group. The experts regarded the haptics and manipulation of the fistula less realistic than the Target group (3.7 versus 4.3, p = 0.021 and 4.2 versus 4.6, p = 0.047). It was considered to be a very good training tool (mean 4.3), without significant differences between the groups. Conclusions These results show general consensus that this model is a potent training tool for the component steps of the repair of an ARM with recto-perineal fistula by sagittal approach.

Anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula: one of a special type

The anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula is a rare anomaly in the spectrum of anorectal malformations. Aim of the study is to describe the series of patients with anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula and compare the outcome with patient with standard perineal fistula. From March 2012 to January 2019, 7 patients who suffered from anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula were retrospectively reviewed. Three were operated on primarily by our department, and 4 cases were re-operated after a perineal anoplasty repair performed elsewhere. Four were operated by laparoscopy assisted anorectoplasty, and 3 cases were repaired by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. The follow-up outcomes were compared with 71 cases of normal perineal fistula (NPF) in the same period. 7 cases have been followed up for 0.5–4 years (M = 2.57 ± 1.26) after definitive surgery. Their bowel function score was lower than normal perineal fistula (SPF = 12, range: 5–18; NPF = 18.5, range: 18–20). Four cases underwent anorectomanometry. The incidence of rectoanal inhibitory reflex was lower in the special type group. (p = 0.14). Three cases of contrast enema using barium: 2 cases of colorectal dilatation and thickening changes, 1 case showed no obvious abnormalities. Anorectal perineal fistula should be examined by distal colostogram at preoperation. This should be altered in: When suspecting a case of anorectal malformation type long perineal fistula a preoperative contrast enema could give insight of the anatomy befor performing a anoplasty.