A Change of Marriage Realization Factors in the Republic Period - Focusing on Marriage Contract -

2021 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 95-129
Author(s):  
Seung-hee Son
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-130
Author(s):  
Flura Burkhanova

The article discusses the values and attitudes in the field of family and marriage, common among the population of 17–49 years. The survey was conducted in 2020 in 10 regions of the Russian Federation, including the Republic of Bashkortostan. The institutions of marriage and the family, and the values on which they are based, have undergone significant changes in recent decades. Their transformations are interpreted as a departure from the so-called traditional attitudes and behaviours and the transition to modern modernization or postmodernization. It is concluded that the population of the Republic has, on average, more traditional family and marriage attitudes and values than the population of the Russian regions that participated in the study. They manifest themselves in the chosen scenarios of marriage, in its motivation, in the ideas of a happy family. It cannot be argued that this is happening at the expense of the rural population, that it is definitely more conservative than the urban population. Although many views of the villagers are more traditional (attitude to the marriage contract, same-sex marriage and some others). The opinion of urban residents on many issues is often polarized, they are clearly divided into supporters of traditional values and modern ones. The polarity of opinions may explain the presence among them of recent immigrants from the village, who have not fully accepted the new values for themselves. Older groups – 30–49 years old, 40–49 years old on some issues, as well as women – are distinguished by great traditionalism. Among representatives of the youngest group, 17–29 years old, who have already entered or will enter the age of active marriage in the next few years, traditionalism is noticeably reduced.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-106
Author(s):  
Budi Hartono ◽  
Sirman Dahwal ◽  
M. Darudin

One of the sources of non-tax state revenues from the District Office of Religious Affairs comes from the marriage fees that are carried out outside the District Office of Religious Affairs, as stipulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 Year 2016. This Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs is applied in all District Offices of Religious Affairs in every City or Regency in Indonesia. The formulations of the problem investigated in this study were: (1) How was the Implementation of the Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 of 2016 concerning the Management of Non-Tax State Revenues on Marriage Fees or Reconciliation Outside the District Office of Religious Affairs in the District Offices of Religious Affairs in Bengkulu City?; (2) Was the marriage cost outside the District Office of Religious Affairs paid by the bride and groom outside the provisions of the Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 year 2016 concerning the Management of Non-Tax State Revenues on Marriage Fees or Reconciliation Outside the District Office of Religious Affairs can be classified as gratification acts y as regulated in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 year 2001 concerning Corruption Crimes?. The research method used to address these problems was the empirical juridical research method. The results of this study indicated that: (1) The regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs Number 12 year 2016 concerning the Management of Non-Tax State Revenues on Marriage Fee and/or Reconciliation Outside the District Office of Religious Affairs, has been implemented at the District Offices of Religious Affairs of Bengkulu City, namely, in terms of the provisions for marriage fees, deposits and receipts, disbursements, uses and reporting. (2) Marriage Fees or Reconciliation Outside the District Office of Religious Affairs, especially in the case of the Headman, or the Head of the District Office  of Religious Affairs, or Officers who received money when carrying out services for the implementation of marriage contract counseling outside the District Office of Religious Affairs, cannot be classified as gratification acts as regulated in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 Year 2001 regarding Corruption Crime.


1972 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 27-38
Author(s):  
J. Hers

In South Africa the modern outlook towards time may be said to have started in 1948. Both the two major observatories, The Royal Observatory in Cape Town and the Union Observatory (now known as the Republic Observatory) in Johannesburg had, of course, been involved in the astronomical determination of time almost from their inception, and the Johannesburg Observatory has been responsible for the official time of South Africa since 1908. However the pendulum clocks then in use could not be relied on to provide an accuracy better than about 1/10 second, which was of the same order as that of the astronomical observations. It is doubtful if much use was made of even this limited accuracy outside the two observatories, and although there may – occasionally have been a demand for more accurate time, it was certainly not voiced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document