scholarly journals Early Predictors for Kindergarten Students at Risk for Dyslexia: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-210
Author(s):  
Emine Balcı ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 539-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milena A. Keller-Margulis ◽  
Sarah Ochs ◽  
Erin K. Reid ◽  
Erin L. Faith ◽  
G. Thomas Schanding

Many students struggle with the basic skill of writing, yet schools lack technically adequate screening measures to identify students at risk in this area. Measures that allow for valid screening decisions that identify students in need of interventions to improve performance are greatly needed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and diagnostic accuracy of early writing screeners. Two early writing screening measures, Picture Word and Word Dictation, were administered to a diverse sample of 95 kindergarten students, almost half of whom were classified as English language learners and almost 70% identified ethnically as Hispanic. It was hypothesized that the early writing screening measures would demonstrate moderate to strong relationships with a standardized norm-referenced measure of written expression and adequate diagnostic accuracy for identifying kindergarten students at risk. Findings indicate that concurrent validity coefficients for both Picture Word and Word Dictation tasks ranged from .32 to .70 with the Written Expression cluster of the Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Achievement–IV and .26 to .61 with the Writing Samples and Sentence Writing Fluency subtests. Diagnostic accuracy results suggest these measures are a promising option for screening early writing skills. Implications for practice and directions for future research are discussed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 487-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darlene H. Anderson ◽  
Scott M. Trinh ◽  
Paul Caldarella ◽  
Blake D. Hansen ◽  
Michael J. Richardson

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Butina ◽  
Andrew R. Wyant ◽  
Randa Remer ◽  
Robert Cardom

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-256
Author(s):  
Gavin W. Watts ◽  
Diane Pedrotty Bryant ◽  
Garrett J. Roberts

Challenges with numerical proficiency at an early age can lead to substantial gaps in learning and are associated with detrimental long-term outcomes. In addition, students with emotional–behavioral disorders (EBD) can have some of the most challenging behavioral and academic needs to address. The purpose of this study was to identify the effects and collateral outcomes of utilizing cross-age tutors (i.e., older students) with/at risk of EBD to deliver a number line board game intervention to kindergarten students at risk of mathematics disabilities. A multiple baseline design across participants was utilized to evaluate the following research questions: (a) What are the effects of a number line game delivered by a cross-age tutor with EBD on the mathematics performance of kindergarten students with mathematics difficulties? (b) Can students with EBD implement tutoring procedures with fidelity? (c) What are the effects of the cross-age tutoring training and implementation on the tutors’ classroom behaviors and risk-status for EBD? Tutoring sessions took place for 25–30 min, 3 times per week, over 10 weeks. Results suggest cross-age tutoring to be an effective and feasible model for improving mathematics performance of at-risk kindergarteners and, to a lesser extent, the behavioral performance of students with EBD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document