scholarly journals Diagnostic Reference Levels of CT Radiation Dose in Whole-Body PET/CT

2015 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Jallow ◽  
P. Christian ◽  
J. Sunderland ◽  
M. Graham ◽  
J. M. Hoffman ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. e43
Author(s):  
Tagkalakis Panayiotis ◽  
Zabelis Ioannis ◽  
Trimis Panayiotis ◽  
Tsatsaronis Konstantinos ◽  
Papaioannou Georgia ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Essam M Alkhybari ◽  
Mark F McEntee ◽  
Patrick C Brennan ◽  
Kathy P Willowson ◽  
Peter L Kench

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 799-806
Author(s):  
Koichiro Abe ◽  
Makoto Hosono ◽  
Takayuki Igarashi ◽  
Takashi Iimori ◽  
Masanobu Ishiguro ◽  
...  

Abstract The diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are one of several effective tools for optimizing nuclear medicine examinations and reducing patient exposure. With the advances in imaging technology and alterations of examination protocols, the DRLs must be reviewed periodically. The first DRLs in Japan were established in 2015, and since 5 years have passed, it is time to review and revise the DRLs. We conducted a survey to investigate the administered activities of radiopharmaceuticals and the radiation doses of computed tomography (CT) in hybrid CT accompanied by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. We distributed a Web-based survey to 915 nuclear medicine facilities throughout Japan and survey responses were provided by 256 nuclear medicine facilities (response rate 28%). We asked for the facility's median actual administered activity and median radiation dose of hybrid CT when SPECT/CT or PET/CT was performed for patients with standard habitus in the standard protocol of the facility for each nuclear medicine examination. We determined the new DRLs based on the 75th percentile referring to the 2015 DRLs, drug package inserts, and updated guidelines. The 2020 DRLs are almost the same as the 2015 DRLs, but for the relatively long-lived radionuclides, the DRLs are set low due to the changes in the Japanese delivery system. There are no items set higher than the previous values. Although the DRLs determined this time are roughly equivalent to the DRLs used in the US, overall they tend to be higher than the European DRLs. The DRLs of the radiation dose of CT in hybrid CT vary widely depending on each imaging site and the purpose of the examination.


2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (1094) ◽  
pp. 20180290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Matsunaga ◽  
Koichi Chida ◽  
Yuya Kondo ◽  
Kenichi Kobayashi ◽  
Masanao Kobayashi ◽  
...  

Objective: To propose a new set of Japanese diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable doses (ADs) for 2017 and to verify the usefulness of Japanese DRLs (DRLs 2015) for CT, by investigating changes in the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) from 2014 to 2017. Methods: Detailed information on the CT scan parameters used throughout Japan were obtained by questionnaire survey. The CTDIvol and dose-length product for the 11 commonest adult and 6 commonest paediatric CT examinations were surveyed and compared with 2014 data and DRLs 2015. Results: Evaluations of adult head (helical), and abdomen and pelvis without contrast agent, paediatric chest without contrast agent, and abdomen and pelvis without contrast agent showed a slightly lower mean CTDIvol in 2017 than in 2014 (t-test, p < 0.05). The interquartile range of CTDIvol for all 2017 examinations was lower than in 2014. Conclusions: This study verified the lower mean, 75th percentile, and interquartile range by investigating changes in the CTDIvol from 2014 to 2017. The DRLs 2015 contributed to CT radiation dose reduction. Advances in knowledge: The widespread implementation of iterative reconstruction algorithms and low-tube voltage in CT scanners is likely to facilitate further reduction in the CT radiation dose used in Japan. Although radiological technologists may require further education on appropriate CTDIvol and DLP usage, the DRLs 2015 greatly contributed to the reduction of the CT radiation dose used in Japan.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Inoue ◽  
Kazunori Nagahara ◽  
Yuri Inoki ◽  
Toshimasa Hara ◽  
Hiroki Miyatake

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (6Part7) ◽  
pp. 3441-3441
Author(s):  
E Tonkopi ◽  
A Ross ◽  
A MacDonald

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1980-1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis R. Verdun ◽  
Daniel Gutierrez ◽  
John Paul Vader ◽  
Abbas Aroua ◽  
Leonor Trinidad Alamo-Maestre ◽  
...  

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472199425
Author(s):  
Kiran R. Madhvani ◽  
Matthew J. R. Clark ◽  
Alex A. J. Kocheta

Background: Diagnostic reference levels are radiation dose levels in medical radiodiagnostic practices for typical examinations for groups of standard-sized individuals for broadly defined types of equipment. This study aimed to contribute to national diagnostic reference levels for common hand and wrist procedures using mini C-arm fluoroscopy. Small joint and digital fracture procedure diagnostic reference levels have not been reported in significant numbers previously with procedure-level stratification. Methods: Data were collected from fluoroscopy logbooks and were cross-referenced against the audit log kept on fluoroscopy machines. A total of 603 procedures were included. Results: The median radiation dose for wrist fracture open fixation was 2.73 cGycm2, Kirschner wiring (K-wiring) procedures was 2.36 cGycm2, small joint arthrodesis was 1.20 cGycm2, small joint injections was 0.58 cGycm2, and phalangeal fracture fixation was 1.05 cGycm2. Conclusions: Wrist fracture fixation used higher radiation doses than phalangeal fracture fixation, arthrodeses, and injections. Injections used significantly less radiation than the other procedures. There are significant differences in total radiation doses when comparing these procedures in hand and wrist surgery. National and international recommendations are that institutional audit data should be collected regularly and should be stratified by procedure type. This study helps to define standards for this activity by adding to the data available for wrist fracture diagnostic reference levels and defining standards for digital and injection procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document