scholarly journals Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Method of Mechanical Support of Blood Circulation in Endovascular Myocardial Revascularization with Underlying Cardiogenic Shock: a Case Report

Author(s):  
B. M. Todurov ◽  
O. A. Loskutov ◽  
O. M. Druzhina ◽  
H. I. Kovtun ◽  
S. R. Maruniak

Today, the use of mechanical circulatory support to maintain proper hemodynamics in percutaneous coronary interventions in high-risk patients opens up new avenues for treating such challenging patients. Moreover, it has enabled to treat cases that were once considered overwhelming. The safety and efficacy of using the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) technique is currently being widely studied, however, the literature describes only isolated cases of using this technique when performing percutaneous angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. In this clinical case, an example of ECMO connection for endovascular myocardial revascularization during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a patient with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is described.

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
R. A. Kornelyuk ◽  
D. L. Shukevich ◽  
I. E. Vereshchagin ◽  
V. I. Ganyukov

Purpose of the study: to evaluate the organoprotective effects of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pump during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome.Materials and methods. Patients required mechanical circulatory support (n=51) were divided into two study groups: patients who received mechanical circulatory support by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (Group 1, n=29) during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, and Group 2 patients who received mechanical circulatory support by intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (Group 2, n=22). The dynamics of instrumental parameters and laboratory markers of organ damage were evaluated by electrocardiography, echocardiography, determining troponin I, creatine phosphokinases and creatinine levels, NGAL, venous blood saturation to compare the organoprotective properties of mechanical circulation support in the intra- and postoperative period.Results. The following values of the parameters were found the next day after the intervention: troponin I — 0.18 (0.1; 2.3) ng/ml in the ECMO group and 1.64 (0.92; 2.36) ng/ml in the IABP group (P=0.045); serum NGAL —139.4 (88.1; 166.7) ng/ml in the ECMO group and 212.3 (102; 279) in the IABP group (P=0.027); renal dysfunction (stages R, I, F according to RIFLE) — 2 (6.8%) observations in the ECMO group and 7 (31.8%) in the IABP group (P=0.021); multiple organ failure (2 or more points according to SOFA) — 3 (10.3%) cases in the ECMO group and 12 (54.5%) in the IABP group (P=0.001).Conclusion. Veno-arterial ECMO in comparison with IABP has a more pronounced organoprotective effect by achieving better hemodynamic stability, which, in turn, prevents hypoxia and the subsequent development of organ dysfunction. In addition, in conditions of veno-arterial ECMO, better completeness and quality of revascularization is ensured, and hospital mortality is also reduced.


ASAIO Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 708-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Mourad ◽  
Philippe Gaudard ◽  
Pablo De La Arena ◽  
Jacob Eliet ◽  
Norddine Zeroual ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (08) ◽  
pp. 5578-5583
Author(s):  
Usman Sarwar ◽  
Nikky Bardia ◽  
Amod Amritphale ◽  
Hassan Tahir ◽  
MD Ghulam M.Awan

Statistical data has shown that patients now treated in cardiac catheterization laboratories are older with several comorbidities, including renal failure, diabetes, and heart failure [1]. In past patients who were not suitable candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention due to their numerous comorbidities now seems to be a suitable candidate due to tremendous advancements in the field of interventional cardiology like new stent design and availability of advance mechanical circulatory support devices, i.e., Impella performing PCI on these high-risk patients become a viable option. There are two areas of cardiology in which mechanical circulatory support devices keep evolving: one is high-risk (percutaneous coronary intervention) PCI, and the other is a cardiogenic shock that is refractory to initial pressor support.  In this article, we review evidence base data regarding the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in high-risk percutaneous intervention and cardiogenic shock.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document