Objective. To compare the use of once-a-day cefpodoxime proxetil to once-a-day cefixime in the treatment of acute suppurative otitis media.
Design. Randomized, multicenter, investigator-blinded.
Setting. Outpatient.
Patients. A total of 368 patients (age 2 months to 17 years) were randomized to receive either cefpodoxime or cefixime in a 2:1 ratio (245 cefpodoxime, 123 cefixime); 236 patients (155 cefpodoxime, 81 cefixime) were evaluable for drug efficacy.
Interventions. Patients received either cefpodoxime proxetil oral suspension (10 mg/kg/day, once daily for 10 days) or cefixime oral suspension (8 mg/kg/day, once daily for 10 days).
Main outcome measures. Clinical evaluations were performed before treatment (study day 1), at an interim visit (study day 3 through 6), at the end of therapy (study day 12 through 15), and at final follow-up (study day 25 through 38). Microbiologic evaluations were performed at enrollment and whenever appropriate thereafter.
Results. End-of-therapy clinical cure rates in evaluable patients were 56% for the cefpodoxime group and 54% for the cefixime group. Clinical improvement rates were 27% for both groups. Clinical response rates were not significantly different between treatment groups (P = .541; 95% confidence interval = -8.1%, 15.2%). At long-term follow-up, 17% of patients in the cefpodoxime group and 20% in the cefixime group had a recurrence of infection. Drug-related adverse events (eg, diarrhea, diaper rash, vomiting, rash) occurred in 23.3% of cefpodoxime-treated patients and 17.9% of cefixime-treated patients (P = .282).
Conclusions. These findings suggest that cefpo-doxime proxetil administered once daily is as effective and safe as cefixime given once daily in the treatment of acute suppurative otitis media in pediatric patients.
Effect of food on absorption of cefpodoxime proxetil oral suspension in adults
