scholarly journals MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE: REVERSE LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE DETERMINES OPPORTUNITY COST OF BULK TIPPING

Detritus ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 160-166
Author(s):  
Manfred Fehr ◽  
Humberto Ferreira Silva Minéu

The opportunity cost concept refers to quantifying the opportunities lost upon choosing one investment option over a more economical alternative. The present study applies the concept to the process of choosing the best investment option for managing municipal solid waste. In a case study in Brazil, the options on the table are bulk collection and tipping versus reverse logistics with selective collection and sale of recovered components. The use of relative monetary values renders the results general and applicable in other scenarios. The bulk tipping option represents the reference cost of 100. The research postulates a linear relation between the opportunity cost of bulk tipping (y) and the efficiency of reverse logistics operations (x). Zero efficiency means bulk collection and tipping of all waste. Full efficiency means capture of all recyclable items, which in the case study amount to 80% of waste. Various intermediate points confirm the relationship that takes the form y=0.968x. The result shows that opportunity cost is dynamic in as much as changes of technologies and administrative procedures move it along that line. It also illustrates to municipal administrations the immediate economic effect of implementation and stepwise improvement of reverse logistics.

2020 ◽  
pp. 0734242X2094716
Author(s):  
Rainer Warrings ◽  
Johann Fellner

The recycling of aluminium (Al) packaging as a single fraction is a new obligation within the Circular Economy Package of the EU, with mandatory recycling rates of 50% for 2025 and 60% for 2030. The case study of Al packaging in Austria has been chosen to assess if and what measures need to be taken to achieve these recycling rates and what costs arise from these measures. In particular, the following options of Al recovery, and combinations thereof, have been investigated: bottom ash (BA) treatment; material recovery facilities (MRF) for mixed municipal solid waste; and changes to the selective collection system. The results of the study reveal that the present recycling rate of 55% for A1 packaging in Austria might be improved most significantly by MRF (up to 94%) and advanced BA treatment (up to 72%). Only minor improvements in the recycling rate (+2%) are achievable via a change in the collection system from selective metal to a mixed selective collection (joint collection of metal and lightweight packaging). If the only aim were to increase the recycling rates for Al packaging beyond the future target of 60%, an improvement in the Al recovery rates from BA treatment would be sufficient. With regard to increased recycling quantities of all recyclables, plastics in particular, the implementation of complex systems such as MRF makes sense, even if this results in higher costs for Al recovery (increasing from the current 480 to 640 € t-1 of recycled Al).


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Oscar Cabeza ◽  
◽  
Alfredo Alonso ◽  
Yoel Lastre ◽  
Jorge Medina ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 890-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezio Ranieri ◽  
Gabriela Ionescu ◽  
Arcangela Fedele ◽  
Eleonora Palmieri ◽  
Ada Cristina Ranieri ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hac Ko ◽  
Jon Powell ◽  
Pradeep Jain ◽  
Hwidong Kim ◽  
Timothy Townsend ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document