Amplitude and pulse rate difference Limens for electrical stimulation of the cochlea following graded degeneration of the auditory nerve

1983 ◽  
Vol 95 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond C. Black ◽  
Annette C. Steel ◽  
Graeme M. Clark
2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 2145-2162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph E. Beitel ◽  
Russell L. Snyder ◽  
Christoph E. Schreiner ◽  
Marcia W. Raggio ◽  
Patricia A. Leake

Cochlear prostheses for electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve (“electrical hearing”) can provide auditory capacity for profoundly deaf adults and children, including in many cases a restored ability to perceive speech without visual cues. A fundamental challenge in auditory neuroscience is to understand the neural and perceptual mechanisms that make rehabilitation of hearing possible in these deaf humans. We have developed a feline behavioral model that allows us to study behavioral and physiological variables in the same deaf animals. Cats deafened by injection of ototoxic antibiotics were implanted with either a monopolar round window electrode or a multichannel scala tympani electrode array. To evaluate the effects of perceptually significant electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve on the central auditory system, an animal was trained to avoid a mild electrocutaneous shock when biphasic current pulses (0.2 ms/phase) were delivered to its implanted cochlea. Psychophysical detection thresholds and electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) thresholds were estimated in each cat. At the conclusion of behavioral testing, acute physiological experiments were conducted, and threshold responses were recorded for single neurons and multineuronal clusters in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC) and the primary auditory cortex (A1). Behavioral and neurophysiological thresholds were evaluated with reference to cochlear histopathology in the same deaf cats. The results of the present study include: 1) in the cats implanted with a scala tympani electrode array, the lowest ICC and A1 neural thresholds were virtually identical to the behavioral thresholds for intracochlear bipolar stimulation; 2) behavioral thresholds were lower than ICC and A1 neural thresholds in each of the cats implanted with a monopolar round window electrode; 3) EABR thresholds were higher than behavioral thresholds in all of the cats (mean difference = 6.5 dB); and 4) the cumulative number of action potentials for a sample of ICC neurons increased monotonically as a function of the amplitude and the number of stimulating biphasic pulses. This physiological result suggests that the output from the ICC may be integrated spatially across neurons and temporally integrated across pulses when the auditory nerve array is stimulated with a train of biphasic current pulses. Because behavioral thresholds were lower and reaction times were faster at a pulse rate of 30 pps compared with a pulse rate of 2 pps, spatial-temporal integration in the central auditory system was presumably reflected in psychophysical performance.


1999 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.Q. Huang ◽  
R.K. Shepherd ◽  
P.M. Center ◽  
P.M. Seligman ◽  
B. Tabor

1987 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Miyamoto ◽  
D. Douglas Brown

Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in the profoundly deaf population through implanted cochlear prostheses has increased the need for reliable electrophysiologic assessment tools. We have recorded electrically evoked brainstem responses (EABRs) in 21 subjects who have received a 3M/House cochlear implant. Recordings have been made, both intraoperatively and postoperatively, in the laboratory setting. The recording technique, methods of stimulus artifact suppression, and results of our measurements are described. Clinical applications of this technology are suggested.


1992 ◽  
Vol 95 (9) ◽  
pp. 1372-1378,1479
Author(s):  
JUN-ICHI MATSUSHIMA ◽  
YUKIO INUYAMA

1987 ◽  
Vol 96 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 41-41
Author(s):  
E. S. Hochmair ◽  
I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer ◽  
E-L. von Wallenberg

ORL ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-161
Author(s):  
Pierre Liard ◽  
Marco Pelizzone ◽  
André Rohr ◽  
Pierre Montandon

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 1430-1452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua H. Goldwyn ◽  
Jay T. Rubinstein ◽  
Eric Shea-Brown

Model-based studies of responses of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation can provide insight into the functioning of cochlear implants. Ideally, these studies can identify limitations in sound processing strategies and lead to improved methods for providing sound information to cochlear implant users. To accomplish this, models must accurately describe spiking activity while avoiding excessive complexity that would preclude large-scale simulations of populations of auditory nerve fibers and obscure insight into the mechanisms that influence neural encoding of sound information. In this spirit, we develop a point process model of individual auditory nerve fibers that provides a compact and accurate description of neural responses to electric stimulation. Inspired by the framework of generalized linear models, the proposed model consists of a cascade of linear and nonlinear stages. We show how each of these stages can be associated with biophysical mechanisms and related to models of neuronal dynamics. Moreover, we derive a semianalytical procedure that uniquely determines each parameter in the model on the basis of fundamental statistics from recordings of single fiber responses to electric stimulation, including threshold, relative spread, jitter, and chronaxie. The model also accounts for refractory and summation effects that influence the responses of auditory nerve fibers to high pulse rate stimulation. Throughout, we compare model predictions to published physiological data of response to high and low pulse rate stimulation. We find that the model, although constructed to fit data from single and paired pulse experiments, can accurately predict responses to unmodulated and modulated pulse train stimuli. We close by performing an ideal observer analysis of simulated spike trains in response to sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli and find that carrier pulse rate does not affect modulation detection thresholds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document