Limited-stage mantle cell lymphoma: not so different from advanced-stage

2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Martin ◽  
Bijal Shah
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19566-e19566
Author(s):  
Apoorva Jayarangaiah ◽  
Shuai Wang ◽  
Tarek N. Elrafei ◽  
Lewis Steinberg ◽  
Abhishek Kumar

e19566 Background: Limited stage mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (stage I-II) is rare and occurs in 5-15% of patients. The ideal treatment approach among radiation (RT), chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or close monitoring (NT) has not been defined. Methods: A retrospective analysis of SEER database (1975 to 2018) was conducted for patients with stage I-II MCL to compare overall survival (OS) among the various treatment modalities in patients >18 years. We excluded patients lacking information on demographic characteristics and survival. Patients were analyzed in 4 groups; RT only, CT only, CRT and no treatment groups. ANOVA test and Chi-square test were used to evaluate parametric and non-parametric variables between groups, respectively. Cancer specific survival (CSS) and OS were assessed by Kaplan-Meier. SPSS 26.0 was used for data analysis. Results: There were in total 2266 patients with limited stage MCL. Median age was 71 years (61-78.25) and predominantly male (65.7%). Stage I MCL was noted in 55.6% and stage II in 44.4% of the patients. The number of patients in each group; RT only, CT only, CRT and NT along with the OS are presented in Table. CSS among these four groups showed no statistically significant differences (p <0.26). OS showed that CT only group has worse survival compared to RT only and CRT groups (p <0.001). CRT has no significant difference in survival compared to RT only (p<0.001). NT was associated with poorest survival rates (p<0.001). Conclusions: In limited stage MCL, RT only and CRT resulted in superior OS compared to CT only. Results suggest a role for incorporation of RT in treatment regimens. One limitation of the study is that the SEER database lacks the ability to distinguish between no receipt of therapy versus lack of availability of data.[Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Cheol Jo ◽  
◽  
Seok Jin Kim ◽  
Ho Sup Lee ◽  
Hyeon-Seok Eom ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Todorovic ◽  
M. Pavlovic ◽  
B. Balint ◽  
N. Kraguljac ◽  
B. Mihaljevic ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 880-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Hoster ◽  
Bernd Metzner ◽  
Roswitha Forstpointner ◽  
Michael Pfreundschuh ◽  
Lorenz Trümper ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 880 On behalf of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG) and the European MCL Network Background: In younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) significantly prolonged response duration with a trend towards improved overall survival in a randomized trial of the European MCL Network (Dreyling et al., ASH 2008). A recently updated clinical trial of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG) also reported a significantly prolonged response duration by the addition of Rituximab to first-line CHOP (Hoster et al., ASH 2008). By pooled analysis of these trials we investigated whether Rituximab and ASCT independently prolong response duration. Methods: The analysis included all advanced stage MCL patients of the trials “CHOP vs. MCP” (Nickenig et al., Cancer 2006), “CHOP vs. R-CHOP” (Lenz et al., JCO 2005) and European MCL trial 1 (Dreyling et al., Blood 2005) with complete or partial remission to either CHOP or R-CHOP first-line induction and randomization between ASCT and Interferon-α maintenance. Response duration was defined as time from the end of successful induction chemotherapy to relapse or death from any cause, overall survival from the end of successful induction chemotherapy to death from any cause. Stratified Kaplan-Meier curves for response duration and overall survival were calculated for the four treatment groups (CHOP without ASCT, CHOP with ASCT, R-CHOP without ASCT and R-CHOP with ASCT). By multiple Cox regression we tested whether the impact of Rituximab (R) and ASCT was independent and additive. Results: One-hundred and eighty patients with MCL were evaluable, 80 treated with R-CHOP, 78 with ASCT (CHOP without ASCT: 56, CHOP with ASCT: 46, R-CHOP without ASCT: 44 and R-CHOP with ASCT: 34). Median age was 55 years (range 34-65), the MIPI classified 71% as low risk, 22% as intermediate risk, and 6% as high risk, and baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. With a median follow-up of 63 months, median response duration was 16 months after CHOP without ASCT, 26 months after R-CHOP without ASCT, 39 months after CHOP with ASCT, and 41 months after R-CHOP with ASCT. In multiple Cox regression including R and ASCT, the hazard ratios of R (0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.86, p = 0.0056) and ASCT (0.50, 95% CI 0.35-0.70, p = 0.0001) were independently significant. There was no interaction between R and ASCT (p=0.43). Median overall survival was 54 months after CHOP without ASCT, 66 months after R-CHOP without ASCT, 90 months after CHOP with ASCT, and not reached after R-CHOP with ASCT. The hazard ratios for OS were 0.70 (95% CI 0.44-1.12, p = 0.14) for R and 0.63 (95% CI 0.41-0.97, p = 0.0379) for ASCT. Conclusions: Our results indicate an additive effect of ASCT and Rituximab in combination with CHOP on response duration in advanced stage MCL patients and support strategies of several study groups to combine Rituximab-containing induction therapies with ASCT in younger MCL patients. However, even after combined treatment approaches, delayed relapses have been observed, supporting the use of maintenance therapy and the introduction of molecular targeted therapeutical strategies. Disclosures: Hoster: Roche: Travel Support. Off Label Use: Rituximab in Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Pfreundschuh:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dührsen:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gisselbrecht:Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Unterhalt:Roche: Travel Support. Dreyling:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1555-1561 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.A. Leitch ◽  
R.D. Gascoyne ◽  
M. Chhanabhai ◽  
N.J. Voss ◽  
R. Klasa ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 558-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Hoster ◽  
Martin Dreyling ◽  
Wolfram Klapper ◽  
Christian Gisselbrecht ◽  
Achiel van Hoof ◽  
...  

There is no generally established prognostic index for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), because the International Prognostic Index (IPI) and Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) have been developed for diffuse large cell and follicular lymphoma patients, respectively. Using data of 455 advanced stage MCL patients treated within 3 clinical trials, we examined the prognostic relevance of IPI and FLIPI and derived a new prognostic index (MCL international prognostic index, MIPI) of overall survival (OS). Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier estimates and the log-rank test for evaluating IPI and FLIPI and multiple Cox regression for developing the MIPI. IPI and FLIPI showed poor separation of survival curves. According to the MIPI, patients were classified into low risk (44% of patients, median OS not reached), intermediate risk (35%, 51 months), and high risk groups (21%, 29 months), based on the 4 independent prognostic factors: age, performance status, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and leukocyte count. Cell proliferation (Ki-67) was exploratively analyzed as an important biologic marker and showed strong additional prognostic relevance. The MIPI is the first prognostic index particularly suited for MCL patients and may serve as an important tool to facilitate risk-adapted treatment decisions in patients with advanced stage MCL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document