Molecular responses at 3 and 6 months after switching to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor are complementary and predictive of long-term outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who fail imatinib

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 1787-1792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Boquimpani ◽  
Rony Schaffel ◽  
Irene Biasoli ◽  
Israel Bendit ◽  
Nelson Spector
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Masaaki Tsuji ◽  
Tatsuki Uchiyama ◽  
Chisaki Mizumoto ◽  
Tomoharu Takeoka ◽  
Kenjiro Tomo ◽  
...  

Myeloid blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-MBC) is rarely seen at presentation and has a poor prognosis. There is no standard therapy for CML-MBC. It is often difficult to distinguish CML-MBC from acute myeloid leukemia expressing the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+ AML). We present a case in which CML-MBC was seen at the initial presentation in a 75-year-old male. He was treated with conventional AML-directed chemotherapy followed by imatinib mesylate monotherapy, which failed to induce response. However, he achieved long-term complete molecular response after combination therapy involving dasatinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and conventional chemotherapy.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2777-2777
Author(s):  
Dennis Dong Hwan Kim ◽  
Hong Gi Lee ◽  
Suzanne Kamel-Reid ◽  
Jeffrey H. Lipton

Abstract Abstract 2777 Background: The BCR/ABL transcript level at 3 months can predict long-term outcomes following frontline therapy with Imatinib or Dasatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. However, data is lacking with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (2GTKI) therapy after Imatinib failure. Methods: A total of 112 patients with CML in chronic phase (CP) receiving 2GTKI after Imatinib failure were reviewed. Treatment outcomes including complete cytogenetic (CCyR), major molecular (MMR) and molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5), treatment failure, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared according to BCR/ABL transcript levels at 3 or 6 months, divided into <1%IS, 1–10%IS and °Ã10%IS. Results: Using cut off of 1%IS and 10%IS BCR/ABL transcript level, 70 patients (65%) showed <1%IS of BCR/ABL transcript level at 3 months, 16 patients (15%) between 1 and 10%IS, and 21 patients (20%), °Ã10%IS at 3 months. BCR/ABL transcript level at 3 months showed better correlation with OS (p<0.001) than that at 6 months (p=0.147). Better OS was also observed in the patients achieving <1%IS (100%) and 1–10%IS (100%) than those with °Ã10%IS at 3 months (70.6%, p<0.001). Those with <1%IS exhibited the best CCyR (100% at 12 months), MMR (93.1±3.2% at 18 months) and MR4.5 (80.2±6.3% at 3 years); those with 1–10%IS, intermediate (56.4±15.5% CCyR at 12 months; 22.1±14.1% MMR at 18 months; 10.0±9.5% MR4.5 at 3 years); and those with °Ã10%IS, the lowest CCyR (16.7±11.2% at 12 months), MMR (6.2±6.1% at 18 months) and MR4.5 rates (0%). Especially, in the subgroup of Imatinib resistant patients (n=59), none of them achieved MR4.5 if BCR/ABL transcript level is above 1% at 3 months (i.e. those with 1–10%IS or °Ã10%IS). Multivariate analysis confirmed strong correlation of BCR/ABL transcript level at 3 months with CCyR (HR 0.019), MMR (HR 0.047), MR4.5 (HR 0.057), treatment failure (HR 12.264), PFS (HR 7.754) and OS (HR 15.115). The group with <1%IS at 3 months maintained significantly lower BCR/ABL transcript level compared to other 2 groups. Conclusion: The BCR/ABL transcript level at 3 months is the most relevant surrogate for outcomes following 2GTKI therapy after Imatinib failure. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2569-2569
Author(s):  
Nancy Cribb ◽  
Tazmin Merali ◽  
Bonnie MK Donato

Abstract Abstract 2569 Background: New treatment options in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have become available in the past years. However, there is a scarcity of published data documenting how patients are treated as well as the impact of the treatment of CP-CML in Canada. Objective: To describe current treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of CP-CML patients receiving treatment in Canada. Methods: Treatment data on CP-CML patients was extracted from a cancer patient treatment summary database, ONCO-CAPPS. The database is comprised of treatment summaries of over 12,000 Canadian cancer patients from across the country. For the study, CP-CML patients aged 18 years or older, who received 400mg of imatinib as 1st-line treatment, and who completed at least 4 continuous weeks of this treatment between October 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009, were eligible for study inclusion. Results: A total of 301 patients met the selection criteria. At the time of review, 62% of patients had a confirmed diagnosis of CP-CML for 2 years or more. Of the CP-CML patients in the study who were prescribed 400mg of imatinib as their initial CP-CML treatment, 51% (155/301) received a 2nd line treatment option, either a dose modification or a change of therapy. Of those requiring 2nd line treatment, 32% (50/155) of patients received an increase in their imatinib dose, resulting in an average daily dose of 664 mg, and representing a 66% increase in the dose of imatinib. Average response times for patients who received an increase in imatinib dose for Complete Hematological Response (CHR) was 183 days, for Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) was 671 days, and for Major Molecular Response (MMR) was 971 days. These response times exceed both Canadian Consensus Guidelines as well as the 2009 ELN (European Leukemia Network) recommendations. Furthermore, 45% (69/155) of patients receiving a 2nd line CML treatment experienced intolerance to imatinib 400 mg resulting in dose decrease or treatment interruption. Switching to second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor agents (dasatinib or nilotinib) due to inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to imatinib occurred in 20% of the population. Conclusions: Analysis of Canadian patients over time revealed that 51% of CP-CML patients initiated on 400mg imatinib received 2nd line treatment. The most frequent modification was due to intolerance. Of note, 32% received a dose escalation, which was more common than switching to a second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Furthermore, response times observed amongst patients in this study whose imatinib dose was escalated exceeded timelines for treatment response determination as noted in both internationally and locally recognized treatment guidelines. Published research demonstrates that delays in achieving response are associated with increased risk of progression among patients with CML. Disclosures: Cribb: Drug Intelligence Inc.: Research Funding. Merali:Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada: Research Funding. Donato:Drug Intelligence Inc.: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3099-3099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingmar Glauche ◽  
Hendrik Liebscher ◽  
Christoph Baldow ◽  
Matthias Kuhn ◽  
Philipp Schulze ◽  
...  

Abstract Predicting minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-treated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients is of major clinical relevance. The reason is that residual leukemic (stem) cells are the source for both, potential relapses of the leukemicclone but also for its clonal evolution and, therefore, for the occurrence of resistance. The state-of-the art method for monitoring MRD in TKI-treated CML is the quantification of BCR-ABL levels in the peripheral blood (PB) by PCR. However, the question is whether BCR-ABL levels in the PB can be used as a reliable estimate for residual leukemic cells at the level of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow (BM). Moreover, once the BCR-ABL levels have been reduced to undetectable levels, information on treatment kinetics is censored by the PCR detection limit. Clearly, BCR-ABL negativity in the PB suggests very low levels of residual disease also in the BM, but whether the MRD level remains at a constant level or decreases further cannot be read from the BCR-ABL negativity itself. Thus, also the prediction of a suitable time point for treatment cessation based on residual disease levels cannot be obtained from PCR monitoring in the PB and currently remains a heuristic decision. To overcome the current lack of a suitable biomarker for residual disease levels in the BM, we propose the application of a computational approach to quantitatively describe and predict long-term BCR-ABL levels. The underlying mathematical model has previously been validated by the comparison to more than 500 long-term BCR-ABL kinetics in the PB from different clinical trials under continuous TKI-treatment [1,2,3]. Here, we present results that show how this computational approach can be used to estimate MRD levels in the BM based on the measurements in the PB. Our results demonstrate that the mathematical model can quantitatively reproduce the cumulative incidence of the loss of deep and major molecular response in a population of patients, as published by Mahon et al. [4] and Rousselot et al. [5]. Furthermore, to demonstrate how the model can be used to predict the BCR-ABL levels and to estimate the molecular relapse probability of individual patients, we compare simulation results with more than 70 individual BCR-ABL-kinetics. For this analysis we use patient data from different clinical studies (e.g. EURO-SKI: NCT01596114, STIM(s): NCT00478985, NCT01343173) where TKI-treatment had been stopped after prolonged deep molecular response periods. Specifically, we propose to combine statistical (non-linear regression) and mechanistic (agent-based) modelling techniques, which allows us to quantify the reliability of model predictions by confidence regions based on the quality (i.e. number and variance) of the clinical measurements and on the particular kinetic response characteristics of individual patients. The proposed approach has the potential to support clinical decision making because it provides quantitative, patient-specific predictions of the treatment response together with a confidence measure, which allows to judge the amount of information that is provided by the theoretical prediction. References [1] Roeder et al. (2006) Dynamic modeling of imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia: functional insights and clinical implications, Nat Med 12(10):1181-4 [2] Horn et al. (2013) Model-based decision rules reduce the risk of molecular relapse after cessation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia, Blood 121(2):378-84. [3] Glauche et al. (2014) Model-Based Characterization of the Molecular Response Dynamics of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI)-Treated CML Patients a Comparison of Imatinib and Dasatinib First-Line Therapy, Blood 124:4562 [4] Mahon et al. (2010) Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol 11(11):1029-35 [5] Rousselot 
et al. (2014) Loss of major molecular response as a trigger for restarting TKI therapy in patients with CP- CML who have stopped Imatinib after durable undetectable disease, JCO 32(5):424-431 Disclosures Glauche: Bristol Meyer Squib: Research Funding. von Bubnoff:Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Saussele:ARIAD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding. Mustjoki:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Guilhot:CELEGENE: Consultancy. Mahon:NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria; ARIAD: Honoraria. Roeder:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document