Breast Neoplasia and Mammography

2004 ◽  
pp. 573-578
Author(s):  
Andrew Da Lio ◽  
Steven Beanes
Keyword(s):  
Science ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 238 (4824) ◽  
pp. 185-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Ali ◽  
R Lidereau ◽  
C Theillet ◽  
R Callahan

Author(s):  
Virginia A. Espina ◽  
Lance Liotta ◽  
Svetlana Rassulova ◽  
Holly Gallimore ◽  
Thalia Grant-Wisdom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Poulin ◽  
A. Frost ◽  
A. Carraro ◽  
E. Mommers ◽  
M. Guillaud ◽  
...  

Nuclear morphometry is a method for quantitative measurement of histopathologic changes in the appearance of stained cell nuclei. Numerous studies have indicated that these assessments may provide clinically relevant information related to the degree of progression and malignant potential of breast neoplasia. Nuclear features are derived from computerized analysis of digitized microscope images, and a quantitative Feulgen stain for DNA was used. Features analyzed included: (1) DNA content; (2) nuclear size and shape; and (3) texture features, describing spatial features of chromatin distribution. In this study replicated measurements are described on a series of 54 breast carcinoma specimens of differing pathologic grades. Duplicate measurements were performed using two serial sections, which were processed and analyzed separately. The value of a single feature measurement, the nuclear area profile, was shown to be the strongest indicator of progression. A quantitative nuclear grade was derived and shown to be strongly correlated with not only the pathologic nuclear grade, but also with tubule formation, mitotic grade, and with the overall histopathologic grade. Analysis of replication precision showed that the standard methods of the histopathology laboratory, if practiced in a uniform manner, are sufficient to ensure reproducibility of these assessments. We argue that nuclear morphometry provides a standardized and reproducible framework for quantitative pathologic assessments.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe C Geyer ◽  
Samuel H Berman ◽  
Caterina Marchiò ◽  
Kathleen A Burke ◽  
Elena Guerini-Rocco ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Moulis ◽  
Dennis C Sgroi
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 274-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn A Staton ◽  
Lucy A Shaw ◽  
Manoj Valluru ◽  
Leslie Hoh ◽  
Ivan Koay ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1727
Author(s):  
Iqbal U. Ali ◽  
Rosette Lidereau ◽  
Robert Callahan

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2532-2532
Author(s):  
Steven M Belknap ◽  
Victoria Godinez-Puig ◽  
Robert E Brannigan ◽  
Simon M Lin ◽  
John Cashy ◽  
...  

2532 Background: Breast cancers in men (BCM) account for <1% of all breast cancers. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) inhibits proliferation of normal and neoplastic mammary tissue and constrains the effect of estrogens. Finasteride (F) and dutasteride (D) are 5-α reductase inhibitors (5-αRIs) that reduce systemic and local dihydrotestosterone and cause gynecomastia in 1–3% of men. The package inserts for F and D state, “the relationship between long-term use of (finasteride/dutasteride) and male breast neoplasia is currently unknown.” F and D are marketed for treatment of symptomatic benign-prostatic hyperplasia. F is marketed for treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Methods: To detect disproportionality in the FDA MedWatch dataset, we calculated the empiric Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) for association of BCM with F or D. We also calculated the attributable risk of BCM exposed to F or D among men at an urban academic hospital (Northwestern Memorial Hospital) and at a rural healthcare system (Marshfield Clinic). Results: In the MedWatch dataset, we identified 33 reports of F-associated BCM and 5 reports of D-associated BCM. For F–associated BCM, the EBGM was 58.95 (95% CI 24.47-81.76; p=0.0001). For D-associated BCM, the EBGM was 15.79 (95% CI 4.57-35.49; p=0.0001). The mean age for BCM after 5-αRI exposure was 70±11 years; 11/38 (29%) had gynecomastia. There were 38 cases of BCM associated with 5-αRI in the combined Northwestern and Marshfield cohort (see table below). Conclusions: We found a highly significant association between BCM and 5-αRI exposure in each of 6 separate analyses (3 sources X 2 drugs), with an estimated 1 extra BCM per 564 men exposed to 5-αRIs. We now plan to assess BRCA status and other risk factors. Given that 5-αRIs are marketed for control of lower urinary tract symptoms or for cosmetic purposes, it is not immediately obvious that use of finasteride or dutasteride for their labeled indications would provide any net benefit. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
pp. jclinpath-2020-207359
Author(s):  
Mirthe de Boer ◽  
Paul J van Diest

Blunt duct adenosis (BDA) is a breast lesion first described by Foote and Stewart in 1945 as a proliferative benign lesion of the terminal duct lobular unit. Throughout recent decades, further literature descriptions of BDA have been confusing. Some consider BDA to be a separate entity, some a growth pattern of columnar cell changes. The WHO 2012 considered BDA and columnar cell changes to be synonyms, while columnar cell lesions, especially those with atypia, are part of a spectrum of early precursors of the low nuclear grade breast neoplasia family. In the updated WHO 2019 version, BDA is mentioned as ‘not recommended’ terminology for columnar cell lesions without further discussing it, leaving the question open if BDA should be considered a separate entity.Good diagnostic criteria for BDA have however largely been lacking, and its biological background has not yet been unravelled. In this paper, we point out that BDA is mainly associated with benign breast lesions and not with other recognised precursor lesions. Further, 16q loss, which is the hallmark molecular event in the low nuclear grade breast neoplasia family, is lacking in BDA. We therefore hypothesise that BDA may not be a true precursor lesion but a benign polyclonal lesion, and propose morphological diagnostic criteria to better differentiate it from columnar cell lesions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document