A study for application of item change sensitivity to longitudinal academic achievement tests

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-384
Author(s):  
Sora Lee
2006 ◽  
pp. 114-156
Author(s):  
Donald G. Paterson ◽  
Gwendolen G. Schneidler ◽  
Edmund G. Williamson

2006 ◽  
pp. 95-113
Author(s):  
Donald G. Paterson ◽  
Gwendolen G. Schneidler ◽  
Edmund G. Williamson

1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 583-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Fisher ◽  
Gerald Rubenstein

60 Ss from Grades 1 through 6 were administered an auditory and visual scanning procedure and 27 of those Ss were given arithmetic and reading achievement tests. Data indicated scanning ability increases linearly with grade in school and the relationship between the scanning measures also increases sharply with grade. Auditory scanning was related to academic achievement; visual scanning only approached significance with arithmetic achievement but was unrelated to reading achievement.


1991 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Maqsud ◽  
Chandra Mohanan Pillai

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-238
Author(s):  
Saifullah ◽  
Abd Mughni

This study aims to test the effect of cognitive reading strategies to enhance undergraduate students academic achievement. This study used quasi-experimental alternative-treatment design with pretest. There are 63 undergraduate students in psychology class as a subject. The research data obtained from reading comprehension achievement tests and prior knowledge test as co-variable. The reading comprehension achievement tests and prior knowledge test score compare before and after learning process and tested using Ancoca. The results showed that the cognitive reading strategies was significantly improve undergraduate students academic achievement of the experimental group than the control group. For the cognitive reading strategies feasible for implementation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina L. Harrison ◽  
Lauren D. Goegan ◽  
Sarah J. Macoun

This study examined the scoring errors across three widely used achievement tests (Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement–Second Edition [KTEA-2], Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Achievement–Third Edition [WJ-III], and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–Third Edition [WIAT-III]) by novice examiners. A total of 114 protocols were evaluated for differences between the measures on the frequency and type of scoring errors. Within-measure analyses were also conducted to identify particular composites or subtests that might be more prone to error. Among the three measures, the WIAT-III was found to have the most scoring elements and was, therefore, the measure most susceptible to errors in scoring. Irrespective of the measure, more errors occurred on composites requiring greater examiner inference and interpretation, similar to previous studies on the propensity of scoring errors on cognitive measures. Results are discussed in relation to assessment fidelity and to assessment training practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document