scholarly journals Recovery Time and Time of First Request for Postoperative Analgesia in Day-case Surgery: Propofol-Ketamine Vs Propofol-Fentanyl

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-08
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mohammed Nuhu ◽  
Sandabe Fatima Kyari ◽  
Adamu Abubakar ◽  
Ali Mohammed Ramat ◽  
Mohammed Abubakar Abiso ◽  
...  
Anaesthesia ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 784-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. G. Wakeling ◽  
P. Creagh Barry ◽  
P. J. Butler

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 104-105
Author(s):  
Nicole Assmann ◽  
Marius Terblanche ◽  
Richard Griffiths

Anaesthesia ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 784-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. G. Wakeling ◽  
P. Creagh Barry ◽  
P. J. Butler

2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Paulius Žeromskas ◽  
Kęstutis Strupas ◽  
Audrius Janėnas

Paulius Žeromskas, Kęstutis Strupas, Audrius JanėnasVilniaus universiteto ligoninės Santariškių klinikų Pilvo chirurgijos centras,Santariškių g. 2, LT-08661 VilniusEl paštas: [email protected] Tikslas Ištirti pacientų požiūrį į hemorojaus chirurginį gydymą dienos chirurgijos sąlygomis. Ligoniai ir metodai Paštu apklausti 2003 m. nuo III–IV laipsnio hemorojaus operuoti 34 pacientai (retrospektyvusis tyrimas). Pacientai operuoti taikant tarpvietės bloko nejautrą su intravenine sedacija. Atlikta Milligan–Morgan hemoroidektomija. Skausmui išvengti ir pooperaciniam nuskausminimui vartoti COX-2 inhibitoriai. Rezultatai Hemorojaus sukelti simptomai visuomeninei veiklai ir darbui iki operacijos trukdė 94,1% apklaustųjų. Po operacijos 91,2% pacientų išnyko juos varginę skundai iki operacijos. Jokių problemų neturėjo 21 (62%) apklaustasis. Taikytą nuskausminimą operacijos metu teigiamai įvertino visi operuoti pacientai: puikiai – 13 (38,2%), labai gerai – 11 (32,4%), gerai – 6 (17,6%), neblogai – 4 (11,8%). Nepakankamo pooperacinio nuskausminimo nenurodė nei vienas pacientas. Gydymą tik vieną parą ligoninėje kaip pakankamą vertino 28 (82,4%) pacientai, o 6 (17,6%) nurodė, kad ligoninėje buvo gydomi per trumpai. Išvykus iš ligoninės pacientus toliau gydė: 16 (47%) – operavęs chirurgas, 7 (20,5%) poliklinikos chirurgas, 4 (12%) – šeimos gydytojas, 7 (20,5% ) gydėsi patys pagal operavusio chirurgo rekomendacijas. Po operacijos išangės gijimas, paciento nuomone, užtruko nuo 2 iki 12 savaičių. Į darbą pacientai po operacijos grįžo nevienodai greitai: po 1 savaitės – 6 (17,6%), po 2 savaičių – 5(14,7%), po 3 savaičių – 6 (17,6%), po 4 savaičių – 6 (17,6%), po 6 savaičių – 3 (9%). Kiti 8 (23,5%) pacientai buvo bedarbiai ir pensininkai. Išvados Hemorojaus gydymą dienos stacionare 28 (82,4%) pacientai vertino teigiamai. Pasirinktą tarpvietės bloko nejautrą su intravenine sedacija ir pooperacinį nuskausminimą COX-2 inhibitoriais pacientai vertino tik teigiamai. Geriausi socialiniai ir ekonominiai rezultatai pasiekiami, kai pacientą po operacijos ambulatoriškai gydo operavęs chirurgas. Pagrindiniai žodžiai: dienos stacionaras, hemorojus, perianalinis blokas Socioeconomic aspects of day case surgery for hemorrhoids Paulius Žeromskas, Kęstutis Strupas, Audrius JanėnasAbdominal Surgery Center, Vilnius University Hospital "Santariškių klinikos",Santariškių str. 2, LT-08661 Vilnius, LithuaniaE-mail: [email protected] Objective This study explores the patients' attitude towards the day case surgery of haemorrhoids. Patients and methods Patients operated on in 2003 because of hemorrhoids were questioned by mail (a retrospective study). All the patients had been suffering from stage III–IV haemorrhoids. Anesthesia of the perianal block with intravenous sedation and the Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy were applied. COX-2 inhibitors were used for pain prevention and postoperative analgesia. Results The anus problems before the operation in 94.1% of the respondents impeded their social activities and work. 91.2% of the patients after the operation had no complaints they suffered before the operation. 21 (62%) respondents experienced no problems at all. The perineal block analgesia was evaluated as excellent by 13 (38.2%) patients, as very good by 11 (32.4%), as good by 6 (17.6%), as not bad by 4 (11.8%). Postoperative analgesia was evaluated as excellent by 6 (17.6%) patients, as very good by 12 (35.3%), as good by 11 (32.4%), as not bad by 5 (14.7%). One-day hospital stay was evaluated as sufficient by 28 (82.4%) patients, and 6 (17.6%) patients considered that the in-hospital stay too short. Sixteen patients were treated by the operating surgeon (47%), by a clinic surgeon (7–20.5%), by family doctor (4–12%), 7–20.5% recovered on their own guided by the operating surgeon instructions. The anus healing lasted (according to the patients) from 2 to 12 weeks. The patients went back to work not equally quickly. Six (17.6%) needed 1 week, 5 (14.7%) 2 weeks, 6 (17.6%) 3 weeks, 6 (17.6%) 4 weeks, 3 (9%) 6 weeks to recover. Eight patients (23.5%) were unemployed or retired. Conclusions One-day hospital stay was evaluated as sufficient by 28 (82.4%) patients. The perineal block analgesia during the operation was evaluated positively by all the patients. None of the patients noted the postoperative analgesia with the COX-2-specific inhibitor as insufficient. Long-term observation by the operating surgeon improves the socioeconomic results. Key words: day case surgery, haemorrhoids, perianal block


1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. M. Weightman ◽  
M. Zacharias

Thiopentone and propofol were used for the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in unpremedicated patients undergoing minor gynaecological procedures. There were no significant differences in the induction and maintenance characteristics except for a high incidence of pain on injection and a greater fall in the mean systolic blood pressure associated with propofol in comparison with thiopentone. Propofol was associated with a quicker early recovery as well as a faster psychomotor recovery, as tested by a peg-board. However, complete psychomotor recovery was not achieved for up to three hours in some patients receiving propofol and so caution is advised regarding the early street fitness of patients receiving repeated doses of the drug for day case surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Morris ◽  
E Hassin ◽  
M Borschmann

AbstractObjective:The safety of day-case tonsillectomy is widely documented in the literature; however, there are no evidence-based guidelines recommending patient characteristics that are incompatible with day-case tonsillectomy. This study aimed to identify which patients should be considered unsafe for day-case tonsillectomy based on the likelihood of needing critical intervention.Method:Retrospective review of 2863 tonsillectomy procedures performed at University Hospital Geelong from 1998 to 2014.Results:Of the patients, 7.81 per cent suffered a post-tonsillectomy complication and 4.15 per cent required intervention. The most serious complications, haemorrhage requiring a return to the operating theatre and airway compromise, occurred in 0.56 per cent and 0.11 per cent of patients respectively. The following patient characteristics were significantly associated with poorer outcomes: age of two years or less (p < 0.01), tonsillectomy indicated for neoplasm (p < 0.01) and quinsy (p < 0.05).Conclusion:The authors believe that all elective tonsillectomy patients should be considered for day-case surgery, with the following criteria necessitating overnight observation: age of two years or less; an indication for tonsillectomy of neoplasm or quinsy; and an American Society of Anesthesia score of more than 2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document